• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大规模预防措施劳动力规划中的不确定性和操作考虑因素。

Uncertainty and operational considerations in mass prophylaxis workforce planning.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, 402 E 67th St, New York, NY 10065, USA.

出版信息

Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009 Dec;3 Suppl 2:S121-31. doi: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e3181be9c39.

DOI:10.1097/DMP.0b013e3181be9c39
PMID:19797960
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The public health response to an influenza pandemic or other large-scale health emergency may include mass prophylaxis using multiple points of dispensing (PODs) to deliver countermeasures rapidly to affected populations. Computer models created to date to determine "optimal" staffing levels at PODs typically assume stable patient demand for service. The authors investigated POD function under dynamic and uncertain operational environments.

METHODS

The authors constructed a Monte Carlo simulation model of mass prophylaxis (the Dynamic POD Simulator, or D-PODS) to assess the consequences of nonstationary patient arrival patterns on POD function under a variety of POD layouts and staffing plans. Compared are the performance of a standard POD layout under steady-state and variable patient arrival rates that may mimic real-life variation in patient demand.

RESULTS

To achieve similar performance, PODs functioning under nonstationary patient arrival rates require higher staffing levels than would be predicted using the assumption of stationary arrival rates. Furthermore, PODs may develop severe bottlenecks unless staffing levels vary over time to meet changing patient arrival patterns. Efficient POD networks therefore require command and control systems capable of dynamically adjusting intra- and inter-POD staff levels to meet demand. In addition, under real-world operating conditions of heightened uncertainty, fewer large PODs will require a smaller total staff than many small PODs to achieve comparable performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Modeling environments that capture the effects of fundamental uncertainties in public health disasters are essential for the realistic evaluation of response mechanisms and policies. D-PODS quantifies POD operational efficiency under more realistic conditions than have been modeled previously. The authors' experiments demonstrate that effective POD staffing plans must be responsive to variation and uncertainty in POD arrival patterns. These experiments highlight the need for command and control systems to be created to manage emergency response successfully.

摘要

背景

应对流感大流行或其他大规模卫生紧急情况的公共卫生措施可能包括使用多点分发(POD)进行大规模预防,以便迅速向受影响人群提供对策。迄今为止,为确定 POD 人员配备的“最佳”水平而创建的计算机模型通常假定对服务的稳定患者需求。作者研究了在动态和不确定的运营环境下 POD 的功能。

方法

作者构建了大规模预防的蒙特卡罗模拟模型(动态 POD 模拟器,或 D-PODS),以评估在各种 POD 布局和人员配备计划下,非平稳患者到达模式对 POD 功能的后果。比较标准 POD 布局在稳定和变化的患者到达率下的性能,这些到达率可能模拟患者需求的实际变化。

结果

为了达到类似的性能,在非平稳患者到达率下运行的 POD 需要比假设稳定到达率更高的人员配备水平。此外,除非人员配备水平随时间变化以适应不断变化的患者到达模式,否则 POD 可能会出现严重的瓶颈。因此,高效的 POD 网络需要指挥和控制系统,能够动态调整内部和 POD 之间的人员配备水平以满足需求。此外,在公共卫生灾难中存在高度不确定性的实际运行条件下,与许多小 POD 相比,较少的大 POD 需要较小的总人员配备即可实现可比的性能。

结论

对捕捉公共卫生灾难中基本不确定性影响的建模环境进行建模对于对反应机制和政策进行现实评估至关重要。D-PODS 比以前建模的更真实地量化了 POD 的运营效率。作者的实验表明,有效的 POD 人员配备计划必须对 POD 到达模式的变化和不确定性做出响应。这些实验强调了需要创建指挥和控制系统以成功管理应急响应。

相似文献

1
Uncertainty and operational considerations in mass prophylaxis workforce planning.大规模预防措施劳动力规划中的不确定性和操作考虑因素。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009 Dec;3 Suppl 2:S121-31. doi: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e3181be9c39.
2
Mass prophylaxis dispensing concerns: traffic and public access to PODs.大规模预防药物分发问题:交通及公众进入预防接种点的情况。
Biosecur Bioterror. 2011 Jun;9(2):139-51. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2010.0027.
3
Hospitals and the novel H1N1 outbreak: the mouse that roared?医院与新型甲型H1N1流感疫情:咆哮的小鼠?
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009 Dec;3 Suppl 2:S100-6. doi: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e3181bf2483.
4
Will routine annual influenza prevention and control systems serve the United States well in a pandemic?在大流行期间,常规的年度流感预防和控制系统能很好地服务于美国吗?
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009 Dec;3 Suppl 2:S160-5. doi: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e3181ad1833.
5
Computer modeling of patient flow in a pediatric emergency department using discrete event simulation.使用离散事件模拟对儿科急诊科患者流量进行计算机建模。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007 Jan;23(1):5-10. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31802c611e.
6
Community planning for pandemic influenza: lessons from the VA health care system.大流行性流感的社区规划:来自退伍军人事务部医疗保健系统的经验教训。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008 Dec;2(4):251-7. doi: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e31817dd143.
7
Medical counterbioterrorism: the response to provide anthrax prophylaxis to New York City US Postal Service employees.医学反生物恐怖主义:为美国纽约市邮政员工提供炭疽预防措施的应对行动。
Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Apr;41(4):441-6. doi: 10.1067/mem.2003.105.
8
Are US jurisdictions prepared to dispense medical countermeasures through open points of dispensing? Findings from a national study.美国司法管辖区是否准备通过开放式分发点分发医疗对策?一项全国性研究的结果。
Health Secur. 2015 Mar-Apr;13(2):96-105. doi: 10.1089/hs.2014.0080. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
9
[Modelling the impact of pandemic influenza].[模拟大流行性流感的影响]
J Prev Med Public Health. 2005 Nov;38(4):379-85.
10
Infection prevention in points of dispensing.配药点的感染预防。
Am J Infect Control. 2009 Nov;37(9):695-702. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.09.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Operational analysis of school-based delivery models to vaccinate children against influenza.针对儿童流感疫苗接种的校本接种模式的运营分析
Health Syst (Basingstoke). 2020 Apr 22;10(3):212-221. doi: 10.1080/20476965.2020.1754733. eCollection 2021.
2
Artificial Intelligence Model of Drive-Through Vaccination Simulation.自动驾驶接种模拟人工智能模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 31;18(1):268. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010268.
3
A Drive-through Simulation Tool for Mass Vaccination during COVID-19 Pandemic.一种用于新冠疫情期间大规模疫苗接种的免下车模拟工具。
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Nov 9;8(4):469. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040469.
4
Systematic review of strategies to manage and allocate scarce resources during mass casualty events.系统评价在大规模伤亡事件中管理和分配稀缺资源的策略。
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Jun;61(6):677-689.e101. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.02.005. Epub 2013 Mar 20.