Suppr超能文献

Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Study:5 年随访:多血管病变糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术血运重建的比较。

The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Study: 5-year follow-up of revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients with multivessel disease.

机构信息

Barts and The London NHS Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2010 Jan;11(1):26-33. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328330ea32.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes study was to assess percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) as treatments for multivessel coronary artery disease in diabetic patients.

BACKGROUND

CABG is generally regarded as the treatment of choice for multivessel coronary artery disease in diabetes. PCI is an alternative therapy. The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization in Type 1 and 2 Diabetes study compared long-term outcomes of CABG with PCI in diabetic patients treated during the bare-metal stent era.

METHODS

We collected data prospectively on consecutive diabetic patients undergoing index angiography in a single tertiary centre from January 1998 to December 2001. Multivessel coronary artery disease was defined as more than 50% luminal stenosis in two or more vessels. Exclusion criteria included left main stem disease and previous revascularization.

RESULTS

Two hundred and thirty-five eligible patients underwent CABG and 237 PCI. Median follow-up was 5.4 years. There were 46 (19%) deaths in the CABG group and 43 (18%) deaths in the PCI group (P = 0.64). Cox regression analysis revealed baseline glomerular filtration rate (hazard ratio 0.979, P = 0.001), age (hazard ratio 1.034, P = 0.033), urgent procedure (hazard ratio 1.97, P = 0.008) and myocardial infarction within 4 weeks (hazard ratio 2.494, P = 0.041) to be important predictors of outcome. At 5 years, there was no mortality difference (hazard ratio 1.0) following adjustment for baseline characteristics, and the Kaplan-Meier survival curves were similar. A subanalysis of patients with three-vessel disease revealed similar outcomes with both PCI and CABG.

CONCLUSION

In the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes study, diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease had similar long-term mortality whether treated with CABG or PCI, the revascularization determined by the physician's choice. This was despite the frequent use of a strategy of selective revascularization in the PCI arm. Randomized trials comparing PCI and CABG specifically in diabetes, that is, Coronary Artery Revascularization in Diabetes and Future Revascularization Evaluation in Diabetes Mellitus: Optimal Management, will show whether drug-eluting stents further enhance PCI outcomes over the long term.

摘要

目的

1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者旁路血管成形术再血管化研究的目的是评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)在糖尿病患者多支血管病变中的治疗效果。

背景

CABG 通常被认为是糖尿病多支血管病变的首选治疗方法。PCI 是一种替代疗法。1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者旁路血管成形术再血管化研究比较了 CABG 和 PCI 在裸金属支架时代治疗糖尿病患者多支血管病变的长期结果。

方法

我们前瞻性地收集了 1998 年 1 月至 2001 年 12 月在一家三级中心进行指数血管造影的连续糖尿病患者的数据。多支血管病变定义为两支或两支以上血管有超过 50%的管腔狭窄。排除标准包括左主干病变和先前的血运重建。

结果

235 例符合条件的患者接受了 CABG 和 237 例 PCI。中位随访时间为 5.4 年。CABG 组有 46 例(19%)死亡,PCI 组有 43 例(18%)死亡(P=0.64)。Cox 回归分析显示,基线肾小球滤过率(危险比 0.979,P=0.001)、年龄(危险比 1.034,P=0.033)、紧急手术(危险比 1.97,P=0.008)和 4 周内心肌梗死(危险比 2.494,P=0.041)是重要的预后预测因素。在调整基线特征后,5 年时,死亡率无差异(危险比 1.0),Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线相似。对三血管病变患者的亚组分析显示,PCI 和 CABG 治疗的长期死亡率相似。

结论

在 1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者旁路血管成形术再血管化研究中,多支血管病变的糖尿病患者接受 CABG 或 PCI 治疗的长期死亡率相似,这取决于医生的选择进行血运重建。这是尽管 PCI 组经常采用选择性血运重建策略。专门在糖尿病患者中比较 PCI 和 CABG 的随机试验,即糖尿病冠状动脉血运重建和糖尿病未来血运重建评估:最佳管理,将显示药物洗脱支架是否能在长期内进一步提高 PCI 的效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验