• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病合并多支血管病变患者经皮冠状动脉血运重建(经皮或旁路)的结局。

Outcomes of coronary revascularization (percutaneous or bypass) in patients with diabetes mellitus and multivessel coronary disease.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2012 Sep 1;110(5):643-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.04.043. Epub 2012 May 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.04.043
PMID:22632829
Abstract

Clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus and multivessel disease (MVD) undergoing coronary revascularization have not been extensively evaluated, we sought to examine outcomes in a diabetic cohort of 195 consecutive patients with MVD characterized by SYNTAX scores (SSs) undergoing nonrandomized revascularization, 102 (52%) by percutaneous intervention (PCI) and 93 (48%) by coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at Liverpool Hospital (Sydney, Australia) from June 2006 to March 2010. Clinical outcomes were assessed at a median term of 14 months. The overall median SS was 44, with significantly higher SSs in CABG- than PCI-treated patients (48 vs 39, p <0.0001). There was a similar incidence of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction and stroke in PCI- and CABG-treated patients (6.1% vs 8.3%, p = 0.383; 12% vs 4.9%, p = 0.152; 3.1% vs 3.5%, p = 0.680 respectively). However, the rates of target vessel revascularization and major adverse coronary and cerebral event were significantly higher in PCI-treated patients than in those undergoing CABG (20% vs 1.2%, p <0.0001; 29% vs 15%, p = 0.034). Despite a much higher SS, patients who underwent PCI achieved comparable outcomes at 1 year to those with diabetes mellitus and a SS ≥ 33 as reported in the SYNTAX trial. In conclusion, in this single-center nonrandomized observational study, coronary revascularization by PCI is associated with increased major adverse coronary and cerebral events at 1-year follow-up, predominantly driven by a high rate of target vessel revascularization. Thus, CABG should remain the revascularization procedure of choice for diabetic patients with MVD and high SSs.

摘要

患有糖尿病和多血管疾病(MVD)的患者在接受冠状动脉血运重建后的临床结果尚未得到广泛评估,我们试图检查在一个糖尿病队列中 195 例 MVD 患者的结果,这些患者的特征是 SYNTAX 评分(SS),他们接受了非随机血运重建,其中 102 例(52%)接受经皮介入治疗(PCI),93 例(48%)接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG),地点是澳大利亚悉尼利物浦医院,时间是 2006 年 6 月至 2010 年 3 月。在中位 14 个月的时间内评估临床结果。总体中位数 SS 为 44,CABG 治疗患者的 SS 明显高于 PCI 治疗患者(48 与 39,p<0.0001)。在 PCI 和 CABG 治疗患者中,全因死亡、非致死性心肌梗死和卒中等的发生率相似(6.1%与 8.3%,p=0.383;12%与 4.9%,p=0.152;3.1%与 3.5%,p=0.680)。然而,在 PCI 治疗患者中,靶血管血运重建和主要不良冠状动脉和脑事件的发生率明显高于 CABG 治疗患者(20%与 1.2%,p<0.0001;29%与 15%,p=0.034)。尽管 SS 高得多,但与 SYNTAX 试验中报道的糖尿病和 SS≥33 的患者相比,接受 PCI 的患者在 1 年时获得了可比的结果。总之,在这项单中心非随机观察性研究中,PCI 血运重建与 1 年随访时主要不良冠状动脉和脑事件增加有关,主要是由于靶血管血运重建的高发生率。因此,对于 MVD 和高 SS 的糖尿病患者,CABG 应仍然是首选的血运重建方法。

相似文献

1
Outcomes of coronary revascularization (percutaneous or bypass) in patients with diabetes mellitus and multivessel coronary disease.糖尿病合并多支血管病变患者经皮冠状动脉血运重建(经皮或旁路)的结局。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Sep 1;110(5):643-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.04.043. Epub 2012 May 25.
2
The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Study: 5-year follow-up of revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients with multivessel disease.Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Study:5 年随访:多血管病变糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术血运重建的比较。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2010 Jan;11(1):26-33. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328330ea32.
3
Impact of diabetes mellitus on patients with unprotected left main coronary artery lesion disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary-artery bypass grafting.糖尿病对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术的无保护左主干冠状动脉病变患者的影响。
Coron Artery Dis. 2012 Aug;23(5):322-9. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e3283564961.
4
PCI versus CABG for multivessel coronary disease in diabetics.糖尿病患者多支冠状动脉疾病的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术对比
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jan 1;73(1):50-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21757.
5
Coronary artery bypass grafting vs. percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with three-vessel disease: final five-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对三血管病变患者的比较:SYNTAX 试验的最终五年随访结果。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 21;35(40):2821-30. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu213. Epub 2014 May 21.
6
Treatment of complex coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes: 5-year results comparing outcomes of bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in the SYNTAX trial.糖尿病患者复杂冠状动脉疾病的治疗:SYNTAX 试验比较旁路手术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 5 年结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 May;43(5):1006-13. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt017. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
7
Outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.多支冠状动脉疾病患者冠状动脉搭桥术与药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的疗效比较
Circulation. 2007 Sep 11;116(11 Suppl):I200-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.681148.
8
ApPropriateness of myocaRdial RevascularizatiOn assessed by the SYNTAX score II in a coUntry without cardiac Surgery faciliTies; PROUST study.在一个没有心脏外科手术设施的国家,通过SYNTAX评分II评估心肌血运重建的适宜性;PROUST研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Jan 15;227:478-484. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
9
Effect of peripheral arterial disease in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with intracoronary stents.外周动脉疾病对接受冠状动脉内支架植入的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的影响。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2004 Sep;79(9):1113-8. doi: 10.4065/79.9.1113.
10
Multivessel coronary revascularization in patients with and without diabetes mellitus: 3-year follow-up of the ARTS-II (Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study-Part II) trial.糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者的多支冠状动脉血运重建:ARTS-II(动脉血运重建治疗研究 - 第二部分)试验的3年随访
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Dec 9;52(24):1957-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.09.010.

引用本文的文献

1
Long term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with diabetes mellitus with multi vessels diseases: A meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗多支血管病变糖尿病患者的长期疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2023 Feb 26;46:101185. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2023.101185. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Comparing clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes undergoing coronary artery bypass graft and percutaneous coronary intervention in real world practice in Iranian population.在伊朗人群的现实临床实践中,比较接受冠状动脉搭桥术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的糖尿病患者的临床结局。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Mar 3;22(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02521-z.
3
Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Outcomes after High-Risk Interventional Coronary Procedures.
糖尿病对高危介入性冠状动脉手术预后的影响。
J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 25;9(11):3414. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113414.
4
Computerized tomographic angiography in patients having eSVS Mesh(R) supported coronary saphenous vein grafts: intermediate term results.接受eSVS Mesh(R)支撑的冠状动脉大隐静脉移植患者的计算机断层血管造影:中期结果
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;9(1):138. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-9-126. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
5
Comparing coronary artery bypass grafting with drug-eluting stenting in patients with diabetes mellitus and multivessel coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.糖尿病合并多支冠状动脉疾病患者冠状动脉旁路移植术与药物洗脱支架置入术的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Mar;18(3):347-54. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt509. Epub 2013 Dec 16.