Department of Chemistry, University of Texas at Dallas, 800 W. Campbell Road, Richardson, Texas 75080, USA.
Inorg Chem. 2009 Nov 2;48(21):10338-45. doi: 10.1021/ic9017008.
The coordination geometry adopted by the lanthanide complexes of DOTA-tetraamides is a critical factor in determining their water exchange kinetics. Controlling the water exchange kinetics of DOTA-tetraamide complexes, and by extension their coordination geometry, is of particular interest because of the potential application of this class of complex as PARACEST MRI contrast agents. To facilitate the maximum CEST effect at the lowest pre-saturation powers much slower exchange kinetics are required than are commonly observed with these types of chelates. Complexes that adopt the more slowly exchanging square antiprismatic coordination geometry are therefore preferred; however, the factors that govern which coordination geometry is preferred remain unclear. A series of DOTA-tetraamide complexes with butyl amide substituents in different regioisomeric configurations provides some insight into these factors. The population of each coordination geometry was found to vary substantially depending upon the regiochemistry of the butyl amide substituent. It was observed that the twisted square antiprism coordination geometry, usually favored in complexes with the larger lanthanide ions only, is also increasingly favored for certain DOTA-tetraamide complexes with the smaller lanthanides. This is in marked contrast to simple DOTA-tetraamide complexes such as DOTAM. The effect was more prevalent in complexes formed with more bulky and more electron donating amide butyl substituents. It is also associated with loss of an inner-sphere water molecule from the complexes of later lanthanides that adopt the twisted square antiprismatic geometry. The complexes with sec-butyl substituents are inherently more complicated because of the introduction of a stereochemical center into each pendant arm. Unlike chiral complexes with larger amide substituents there is no "locking" effect of the orientation of the pendant arms in these complexes and up to four diastereoisomeric coordination isomers can be observed.
镧系元素配合物的 DOTA-四酰胺的配位几何形状是决定其水交换动力学的关键因素。控制 DOTA-四酰胺配合物的水交换动力学,进而控制其配位几何形状,具有重要意义,因为这类配合物具有作为 PARACEST MRI 对比剂的潜在应用。为了在最低预饱和功率下实现最大的 CEST 效应,需要比通常观察到的这些螯合物更慢的交换动力学。因此,优先选择采用更慢交换的四方反棱柱配位几何形状的配合物;然而,控制哪种配位几何形状占优势的因素尚不清楚。一系列具有不同区域异构体构型的丁酰胺取代基的 DOTA-四酰胺配合物提供了一些关于这些因素的见解。发现每种配位几何形状的比例都根据丁酰胺取代基的区域化学发生了很大变化。观察到,扭曲的四方反棱柱配位几何形状通常仅在较大镧系元素离子的配合物中占优势,对于某些较小镧系元素的 DOTA-四酰胺配合物也越来越占优势。这与简单的 DOTA-四酰胺配合物(如 DOTAM)形成鲜明对比。这种效应在形成与更大和更供电子酰胺丁基取代基的配合物中更为普遍。它还与后来采用扭曲四方反棱柱几何形状的镧系元素配合物中失去一个内球水分子有关。具有仲丁基取代基的配合物由于在每个悬垂臂中引入了一个立体化学中心而固有地更加复杂。与具有较大酰胺取代基的手性配合物不同,在这些配合物中,悬垂臂的取向没有“锁定”效应,可以观察到多达四个非对映异构体的配位异构体。