Kuchulakanti Pramod K, Waksman Ron
Interventional Cardiologist, Wockhardt Heart Center, LB Nagar, Kamineni Hospital Hyderabad-68, India.
Future Cardiol. 2006 Jul;2(4):483-91. doi: 10.2217/14796678.2.4.483.
Drug-eluting stents (DESs) have shown the ability to reduce restenosis and major adverse cardiac events in de novo lesions when compared with bare metal stents in randomized studies. Enthused by the results of these trials, DESs are being used in other difficult lesion subsets, such as bifurcation lesions, in-stent restenosis, vein graft lesions and chronic total occlusions. They are also being used in difficult patient subsets, such as diabetes and acute myocardial infarction. Not all DES are equal, however, and research is now focused on understanding the differences between these stents. This review discusses the DESs that are US FDA-approved and currently available in the USA, namely Cypher (Cordis Corporation) and Taxus (Boston Scientific), and whether they are comparable.
与裸金属支架相比,药物洗脱支架(DESs)在随机研究中已显示出降低初发病变中再狭窄和主要不良心脏事件的能力。受这些试验结果的鼓舞,DESs正被用于其他困难病变亚组,如分叉病变、支架内再狭窄、静脉桥病变和慢性完全闭塞病变。它们也被用于困难患者亚组,如糖尿病患者和急性心肌梗死患者。然而,并非所有的DES都是一样的,目前研究集中在了解这些支架之间的差异。本综述讨论了已获美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准且目前在美国可用的DESs,即西罗莫司洗脱支架(Cypher,科迪斯公司)和紫杉醇洗脱支架(Taxus,波士顿科学公司),以及它们是否具有可比性。