Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, University and Regional Laboratories, Region Skåne and Division of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Transfusion. 2010 Feb;50(2):308-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02398.x. Epub 2009 Oct 5.
A flow cytometric method for detection of low levels of A/B antigen had been developed previously in our laboratory. The aim of this study was to investigate if this approach could be utilized to characterize different ABO subgroups and constitute a useful tool in a reference laboratory.
Blood samples causing ABO discrepancies (n = 94) by routine serology were further analyzed by ABO genotyping and flow cytometry. To verify the specificity of the monoclonal anti-A and -B reagents and to establish normal flow cytometric patterns, samples from 80 blood donors with common phenotypes were also assessed.
Distinguishable flow cytometric patterns were detected for several subgroups but were more apparent for A(weak) (n = 80) samples than B(weak) (n = 14). Two subgroups, A(finn) (n = 11) and A(3) (n = 10) displayed diagnostic features and were used to establish reproduciblity over time and between donors. In general, the consistency within subgroups was remarkable. The allelic enhancement phenomenon was clearly visualized among A(x) samples (n = 10) where different alleles in trans resulted in high, low, or no A antigen expression. Nonsubgroup samples including O/A and O/B chimeras or A(h) and B(h) para-Bombay phenotypes displayed clearly distinguishable histograms. Samples from pregnant women (n = 10) displayed acquired A antigen loss, apparently accentuated during the third trimester.
Genetically defined ABO subgroups and other anomalous phenotypes displayed flow cytometric profiles that may contribute valuable information to the investigation of ABO discrepancies. We conclude that the presented assay may complement traditional serology and genetic analysis in the reference laboratory setting.
本实验室先前开发了一种用于检测低水平 A/B 抗原的流式细胞术方法。本研究旨在探讨该方法是否可用于鉴定不同的 ABO 亚型,并成为参考实验室的有用工具。
通过常规血清学导致 ABO 差异的血液样本(n=94),进一步通过 ABO 基因分型和流式细胞术进行分析。为了验证单克隆抗-A 和 -B 试剂的特异性并建立正常的流式细胞术模式,还评估了 80 名具有常见表型的献血者样本。
检测到几个亚组的可区分流式细胞术模式,但 A(弱)(n=80)样本比 B(弱)(n=14)样本更为明显。两个亚组,A(finn)(n=11)和 A(3)(n=10)显示出诊断特征,并用于建立时间和供体之间的可重复性。一般来说,亚组内的一致性非常显著。在 A(x)样本(n=10)中,不同等位基因的反式表达导致高、低或无 A 抗原表达,清楚地观察到等位基因增强现象。包括 O/A 和 O/B 嵌合体或 A(h)和 B(h)para-Bombay 表型的非亚组样本显示出明显可区分的直方图。10 名孕妇样本(n=10)显示获得性 A 抗原丢失,显然在第三孕期加重。
遗传定义的 ABO 亚组和其他异常表型显示出流式细胞术图谱,可为 ABO 差异的研究提供有价值的信息。我们得出结论,所提出的检测方法可以在参考实验室环境中补充传统的血清学和遗传分析。