Escaned Javier, Flores Alex, García-Pavía Pablo, Segovia Javier, Jimenez Jesús, Aragoncillo Paloma, Salas Clara, Alfonso Fernando, Hernández Rosana, Angiolillo Dominick J, Jiménez-Quevedo Pilar, Bañuelos Camino, Alonso-Pulpón Luis, Macaya Carlos
Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Circulation. 2009 Oct 20;120(16):1561-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.834739. Epub 2009 Oct 5.
Intracoronary physiology techniques have been validated extensively for the assessment of epicardial stenoses but not for the lone study of coronary microcirculation. We performed a comparison between 4 intracoronary physiological indices with the actual structural microcirculatory changes documented in transplanted hearts.
In 17 cardiac allograft patients without coronary stenoses, ECG, intracoronary Doppler flow velocity, and aortic pressure were digitally recorded before and during maximal hyperemia with a dedicated system. Postprocessing of data yielded 4 indices of microcirculatory status: coronary flow velocity reserve (2.13+/-0.59), instantaneous hyperemic diastolic velocity pressure slope (2.33+/-1.25 cm x s x (-1)mm Hg(-1)), coronary resistance index (1.65+/-0.88 mm Hg x cm(-1) x s(-1)), and coronary resistance reserve (2.36+/-0.65). Quantitative morphometry was performed in endomyocardial biopsies during the same hospital intake; arteriolar obliteration (76.57+/-6.95%) and density (2.00+/-1.22 arterioles per 1 mm(2)) and capillary density (645+/-179 capillaries per 1 mm(2)) were measured. Univariate regression analysis between intracoronary measurements and histological findings revealed that instantaneous hyperemic diastolic velocity-pressure slope correlated with arteriolar obliteration (r=0.58, P=0.014) and capillary density (r=0.60, P=0.012). Statistical adjustment revealed an independent contribution of arteriolar obliteration (beta=0.61, P=0.0009) and capillary density (beta=-0.60, P=0.0008) to instantaneous hyperemic diastolic velocity-pressure slope values, resulting in an excellent predictive model (r=0.84, P=0.0002). Coronary resistance index correlated only with capillary density (r=0.70, P=0.019). Relative indices (coronary flow velocity reserve and coronary resistance reserve) did not correlate significantly with arteriolar obliteration, capillary density, or arteriolar density.
Intracoronary indices derived from pressure and flow, particularly instantaneous hyperemic diastolic velocity-pressure slope, appear to be superior to coronary flow velocity reserve in detecting structural microcirculatory changes. Both arteriolar obliteration and capillary rarefaction seem to influence microcirculatory hemodynamics independently.
冠状动脉内生理学技术已被广泛验证用于评估心外膜狭窄,但尚未用于单独研究冠状动脉微循环。我们对4种冠状动脉内生理学指标与移植心脏中记录的实际结构微循环变化进行了比较。
在17例无冠状动脉狭窄的心脏移植患者中,使用专用系统在最大充血前后数字记录心电图、冠状动脉内多普勒流速和主动脉压力。数据后处理得出4个微循环状态指标:冠状动脉血流储备(2.13±0.59)、瞬时充血舒张期流速压力斜率(2.33±1.25 cm·s⁻¹·mmHg⁻¹)、冠状动脉阻力指数(1.65±0.88 mmHg·cm⁻¹·s⁻¹)和冠状动脉阻力储备(2.36±0.65)。在同一住院期间对心内膜活检进行定量形态学分析;测量小动脉闭塞率(76.57±6.95%)、密度(每1mm² 2.00±1.22条小动脉)和毛细血管密度(每1mm² 645±179条毛细血管)。冠状动脉内测量值与组织学结果之间的单变量回归分析显示,瞬时充血舒张期流速压力斜率与小动脉闭塞率(r=0.58,P=0.014)和毛细血管密度(r=0.60,P=0.012)相关。统计调整显示小动脉闭塞率(β=0.61,P=0.0009)和毛细血管密度(β=-0.60,P=0.0008)对瞬时充血舒张期流速压力斜率值有独立贡献,从而得出一个优秀的预测模型(r=0.84,P=0.0002))。冠状动脉阻力指数仅与毛细血管密度相关(r=0.70,P=0.019)。相对指标(冠状动脉血流储备和冠状动脉阻力储备)与小动脉闭塞率、毛细血管密度或小动脉密度无显著相关性。
来自压力和流量的冠状动脉内指标,特别是瞬时充血舒张期流速压力斜率,在检测结构微循环变化方面似乎优于冠状动脉血流储备。小动脉闭塞和毛细血管稀疏似乎都独立影响微循环血流动力学。