Jay Pasricha Pankaj, Krummel Thomas M
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Alway Building, Room M211, 300 Pasteur Drive, MC 5187, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Oct;104(10):2384-6. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.150.
In this inaugural year of a historic presidency, gastroenterologists and gastrointestinal surgeons may well want to turn their attention to more immediate transformative events that have the potential to revolutionize their own practice in the near future. The most visible and, perhaps, controversial of these is natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), but other equally important changes are emerging as investigators around the globe vie with one another in the demonstration of increasingly audacious procedures. As is to be expected, we are also already seeing a backlash from more conservative scholars attempting to temper what they believe to be the surgical equivalent of irrational exuberance. However, by far the most common attitude among gastroenterologists toward these changes is one of indifference. In this piece, we discuss the circumstances that led to the development of NOTES and other innovative procedures, the peril that lies in ignoring them, and the true promise that they hold for our specialties.
在这具有历史意义的总统任期首年,胃肠病学家和胃肠外科医生很可能希望将注意力转向更直接的变革性事件,这些事件有可能在不久的将来彻底改变他们自己的医疗实践。其中最引人关注且或许最具争议的是自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES),但随着全球各地的研究人员竞相展示越来越大胆的手术,其他同样重要的变革也正在出现。不出所料,我们已经看到较为保守的学者发出了反对声音,他们试图抑制他们所认为的类似手术领域非理性繁荣的现象。然而,到目前为止,胃肠病学家对这些变革最普遍的态度是漠不关心。在本文中,我们将讨论促成NOTES及其他创新手术发展的情况、忽视它们所带来的风险以及它们为我们专业领域所带来的真正前景。