Rehabilitation Studies Unit, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Osteoporos Int. 2010 Jan;21(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-1055-2.
While hip protectors are effective in some clinical trials, many, including all in community settings, have been unable to demonstrate effectiveness. This is due partly to differences in the design and analysis. The aim of this report is to develop recommendations for subsequent clinical research.
In November of 2007, the International Hip Protector Research Group met to address barriers to the clinical effectiveness of hip protectors. This paper represents a consensus statement from the group on recommended methods for conducting future clinical trials of hip protectors.
Consensus recommendations include the following: the use of a hip protector that has undergone adequate biomechanical testing, the use of sham hip protectors, the conduct of clinical trials in populations with annual hip fracture incidence of at least 3%, a run-in period with demonstration of adequate adherence, surveillance of falls and adherence, and the inclusion of economic analyses. Larger and more costly clinical trials are required to definitively investigate effectiveness of hip protectors.
虽然护髋器在一些临床试验中是有效的,但许多试验,包括所有在社区环境中的试验,都未能证明其有效性。这部分是由于设计和分析的差异。本报告的目的是为后续的临床研究制定建议。
2007 年 11 月,国际护髋器研究小组举行会议,讨论了护髋器在临床应用中有效性的障碍。本文代表了该小组对未来护髋器临床试验建议方法的共识声明。
共识建议包括以下内容:使用经过充分生物力学测试的护髋器、使用假护髋器、在每年髋部骨折发生率至少为 3%的人群中进行临床试验、在证明有足够的依从性的情况下进行预试验、对跌倒和依从性进行监测,以及包括经济分析。需要进行更大规模和更昂贵的临床试验来确定护髋器的有效性。