Gorodeski Eiran Z, Chu Eric C, Reese Jennifer R, Shishehbor Mehdi H, Hsich Eileen, Starling Randall C
Section of Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplant Medicine, Kaufman Center for Heart Failure, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Circ Heart Fail. 2009 Jul;2(4):320-4. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.108.839076. Epub 2009 May 14.
There are no published clinical trials comparing dobutamine with milrinone in outpatients with stage D heart failure on continuous inotropes.
In a retrospective analysis of 112 inotrope-dependent patients with stage D heart failure who were not transplant candidates at enrollment, we investigated the relationship between choice of dobutamine or milrinone and mortality. Half the patients were on dobutamine (mean dose, 5.4+/-2.5 microg/kg per minute) and half on milrinone (mean dose, 0.4+/-0.2 microg/kg per minute). Those on dobutamine tended to be older (63 years old versus 54 years old), male (86% versus 79%), and fewer had implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (57% versus 74%). During a median follow-up time of 130 days (range, 2 to 2345 days), there were 85 deaths (76% of cohort) and 55 rehospitalizations. Use of dobutamine compared with milrinone was associated with higher all-cause mortality in an unadjusted analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.63; 95% CI, 1.06 to 2.52; P<0.03). However, this association was not significant after adjustment for baseline characteristics in the full cohort (N=112; HR, 0.99; 95% CI 0.5 to 1.97; P=0.98) or propensity-matched cohort (N=70; HR, 0.94; 95% CI 0.48 to 1.85; P=0.86).
In this single-center retrospective study, there were no mortality differences between chronic intravenous dobutamine or milrinone in patients with stage D heart failure being discharged from the hospital. The high mortality in this group selected for inotrope dependence warrants careful consideration of all options and priorities for further care.
尚无已发表的临床试验比较多巴酚丁胺与米力农在持续使用正性肌力药物的D期心力衰竭门诊患者中的疗效。
在一项对112例依赖正性肌力药物的D期心力衰竭患者的回顾性分析中,这些患者在入组时均不符合心脏移植条件,我们研究了多巴酚丁胺或米力农的选择与死亡率之间的关系。一半患者使用多巴酚丁胺(平均剂量,5.4±2.5微克/千克每分钟),另一半使用米力农(平均剂量,0.4±0.2微克/千克每分钟)。使用多巴酚丁胺的患者往往年龄较大(63岁对54岁),男性比例较高(86%对79%),且植入式心脏复律除颤器的比例较低(57%对74%)。在中位随访时间130天(范围,2至2345天)内,有85例死亡(占队列的76%)和55例再次住院。在未经调整的分析中,与米力农相比,使用多巴酚丁胺与全因死亡率较高相关(风险比[HR],1.63;95%可信区间,1.06至2.52;P<0.03)。然而,在对整个队列(N = 112;HR,0.99;95%可信区间0.5至1.97;P = 0.98)或倾向匹配队列(N = 70;HR,0.94;95%可信区间0.48至1.85;P = 0.86)的基线特征进行调整后,这种关联并不显著。
在这项单中心回顾性研究中,对于出院的D期心力衰竭患者,长期静脉使用多巴酚丁胺或米力农在死亡率方面没有差异。该组因依赖正性肌力药物而导致的高死亡率值得对进一步治疗的所有选择和优先事项进行仔细考虑。