Ahnert M, Tränckner J, Günther N, Hoeft S, Krebs P
Institute for Urban Water Management, Technische Universität Dresden, 01069, Dresden, Germany.
Water Sci Technol. 2009;60(7):1875-83. doi: 10.2166/wst.2009.514.
Two different approaches to increase the fraction of combined water treated in the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) which would otherwise contribute to combined sewer overflows (CSO) are presented and compared based on modelling results with regard to their efficiencies during various rain events. The first option is to generally increase the WWTP inflow according to its actual capacity rather than pre-setting a maximum that applies to worst case loading. In the second option the WWTP inflow is also increased, however, the extra inflow of combined water is bypassing the activated sludge tank and directly discharged to the secondary clarifier. Both approaches have their advantages. For the simulated time series with various rain events, the reduction of total COD load from CSOs and WWTP effluent discharged to the receiving water was up to 20% for both approaches. The total ammonia load reduction was between 6% for the bypass and 11% for inflow increase. A combination of both approaches minimises the adverse effects and the overall emission to the receiving water.
本文基于不同降雨事件期间的模拟结果,展示并比较了两种不同的方法,以提高污水处理厂(WWTP)中合并处理的水的比例,否则这些水将导致合流制溢流(CSO)。第一种选择是根据污水处理厂的实际处理能力,而非预设适用于最坏情况负荷的最大值,来普遍增加其进水流量。第二种选择同样是增加污水处理厂的进水流量,然而,额外的混合水进水绕过活性污泥池,直接排放至二次沉淀池。两种方法都有各自的优点。对于具有不同降雨事件的模拟时间序列,两种方法使CSO和排放到受纳水体的污水处理厂出水的总化学需氧量(COD)负荷降低了20%。总氨负荷降低率在旁路法的6%至进水增加法的11%之间。两种方法相结合可将不利影响和向受纳水体的总排放量降至最低。