• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

I型胶原蛋白生物标志物在乳腺癌、肺癌、膀胱癌和前列腺癌骨转移诊断中的应用。与癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原15-3(CA 15-3)、前列腺特异抗原(PSA)及骨闪烁显像的比较。

Type I collagen biomarkers in the diagnosis of bone metastases in breast cancer, lung cancer, urinary bladder cancer and prostate cancer. Comparison to CEA, CA 15-3, PSA and bone scintigraphy.

作者信息

Zissimopoulos A, Stellos K, Matthaios D, Petrakis G, Parmenopoulou V, Babatsikou F, Matthaiou E, Theodosiadou E, Hountis P, Koutis C

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.

出版信息

J BUON. 2009 Jul-Sep;14(3):463-72.

PMID:19810140
Abstract

PURPOSE

In this study we evaluated the clinical usefulness of serum pro-I collagen peptide (PICP) and I collagen telopeptide (ICTP) as indicators of early bone metastases in patients with breast (BC), lung (LC), urinary bladder (UBC) and prostate cancer (PC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

305 patients were examined. 145 had histologically confirmed BC (92 with bone metastases), 20 UBC (6 with bone metastases), 11 LC (3 with bone metastases) and 129 PC (68 with bone metastases). In BC patients we compared the PICP and ICTP levels with those of CA 15-3, CEA and bone scintigraphy. Patients with LC and UBC had PICP and ICTP measurements, PC patients had serum PICP, prostate specific antigen (PSA) measurements and bone scans. 104 healthy individuals served as controls.

RESULTS

ICTP and CA 15-3 levels were significantly higher in patients with BC and bone metastases in comparison to patients without metastases (p <0.05), while PICP and CEA were only marginally higher. Significant correlation was observed between existence of bone metastases and ICTP levels (p <0.05). The sensitivity of PICP, ICTP, CEA and CA 15-3 was 28.1, 48.6, 42, and 78%, respectively and specificity was 83.9, 94, 65 and 86%, respectively. ICTP and CA 15-3 were the most reliable markers for early diagnosis of bone metastases in BC. PICP alone or with ICTP were not sensitive enough. Only CA 15-3 showed sensitivity 78% and specificity 86%. When combined CA 15-3, ICTP and CEA the sensitivity and specificity increased to 82% and 96%, respectively. Furthermore, PICP and PSA levels were significantly higher in patients with PC and bone metastases in comparison to patients with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) (p <0.0001) or in patients with PC without bone metastases (p <0.0005 for PICP and p <0.0001 for PSA). The co-evaluation of PICP and PSA improved the sensitivity (78%), specificity (96%), accuracy (97%) and positive predictive value (97%). In LC patients, ICTP levels differed significantly between patients with and without bone metastases (p=0.025). In UBC patients, PICP levels differed significantly between patients with and without bone metastases (p=0.017).

CONCLUSION

ICTP and CA 15-3 are the most reliable markers for early diagnosis of bone metastases in BC patients. PICP could be useful for diagnosing early bone metastases of PC and combined with PSA and bone scan can be an additional tool in the follow-up of PC patients. For LC patients, ICTP showed a significant difference in the discrimination of patients with and without bone metastases. In UBC patients, PICP showed a significant difference in the discrimination of patients with and without bone metastases.

摘要

目的

在本研究中,我们评估了血清前I型胶原蛋白肽(PICP)和I型胶原蛋白端肽(ICTP)作为乳腺癌(BC)、肺癌(LC)、膀胱癌(UBC)和前列腺癌(PC)患者早期骨转移指标的临床实用性。

患者与方法

对305例患者进行了检查。145例经组织学确诊为BC(92例有骨转移),20例UBC(6例有骨转移),11例LC(3例有骨转移)和129例PC(68例有骨转移)。在BC患者中,我们将PICP和ICTP水平与CA 15 - 3、CEA水平以及骨闪烁显像结果进行了比较。LC和UBC患者进行了PICP和ICTP检测,PC患者进行了血清PICP、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测以及骨扫描。104名健康个体作为对照。

结果

与无转移的患者相比,BC伴骨转移患者的ICTP和CA 15 - 3水平显著更高(p <0.05),而PICP和CEA仅略高。骨转移的存在与ICTP水平之间存在显著相关性(p <0.05)。PICP、ICTP、CEA和CA 15 - 3的敏感性分别为28.1%、48.6%、42%和78%,特异性分别为83.9%、94%、65%和86%。ICTP和CA 15 - 3是BC患者早期骨转移最可靠的标志物。单独的PICP或与ICTP联合使用敏感性均不足。仅CA 15 - 3的敏感性为78%,特异性为86%。当CA 15 - 3、ICTP和CEA联合使用时,敏感性和特异性分别提高到82%和96%。此外,与良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者相比,PC伴骨转移患者的PICP和PSA水平显著更高(p <0.0001),与无骨转移的PC患者相比也显著更高(PICP为p <0.0005,PSA为p <0.0001)。PICP和PSA的联合评估提高了敏感性(78%)、特异性(96%)、准确性(97%)和阳性预测值(97%)。在LC患者中,有骨转移和无骨转移患者的ICTP水平差异显著(p = 0.025)。在UBC患者中,有骨转移和无骨转移患者的PICP水平差异显著(p = 0.017)。

结论

ICTP和CA 15 - 3是BC患者早期骨转移最可靠的标志物。PICP可用于诊断PC的早期骨转移,与PSA和骨扫描联合可作为PC患者随访的额外工具。对于LC患者,ICTP在区分有骨转移和无骨转移患者方面显示出显著差异。对于UBC患者,PICP在区分有骨转移和无骨转移患者方面显示出显著差异。

相似文献

1
Type I collagen biomarkers in the diagnosis of bone metastases in breast cancer, lung cancer, urinary bladder cancer and prostate cancer. Comparison to CEA, CA 15-3, PSA and bone scintigraphy.I型胶原蛋白生物标志物在乳腺癌、肺癌、膀胱癌和前列腺癌骨转移诊断中的应用。与癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原15-3(CA 15-3)、前列腺特异抗原(PSA)及骨闪烁显像的比较。
J BUON. 2009 Jul-Sep;14(3):463-72.
2
[Procollagen-I, collagen telopeptide I, CEA, CA 15-3 as compared to bone scintigraphy in patients with breast cancer].[乳腺癌患者中前胶原蛋白-I、胶原蛋白端肽I、癌胚抗原、CA 15-3与骨闪烁显像的比较]
Hell J Nucl Med. 2006 Jan-Apr;9(1):60-4.
3
[Correlation of procollagen (I) with prostate specific antigen and bone scan for the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with prostate carcinoma].[I型前胶原与前列腺特异性抗原及骨扫描在前列腺癌患者骨转移诊断中的相关性]
Hell J Nucl Med. 2004 Sep-Dec;7(3):162-7.
4
Serum concentrations of type I collagen carboxyterminal telopeptide (ICTP) and type I procollagen carboxy-and aminoterminal propeptides (PICP, PINP) as markers of metastatic bone disease in breast cancer.血清I型胶原羧基末端肽(ICTP)以及I型前胶原羧基末端和氨基末端前肽(PICP、PINP)的浓度作为乳腺癌转移性骨病的标志物。
Anticancer Res. 1996 Jul-Aug;16(4B):2289-93.
5
Pyridinoline cross-linked carboxyterminal telopeptide of type I collagen as a useful marker for monitoring metastatic bone activity in men with prostate cancer.吡啶啉交联的I型胶原羧基末端端肽作为监测前列腺癌男性患者转移性骨活动的有用标志物。
J Urol. 2001 Sep;166(3):1106-10.
6
[Clinical usefulness of cross-linked N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx) as a bone metastatic marker in patients with prostate cancer--comparison with serum PICP, PINP and ICTP].[I型胶原交联N-端肽(NTx)作为前列腺癌患者骨转移标志物的临床应用——与血清PICP、PINP和ICTP的比较]
Hinyokika Kiyo. 2000 Dec;46(12):869-72.
7
Serum concentration of type I collagen metabolites as a quantitative marker of bone metastases in patients with prostate carcinoma.血清I型胶原代谢产物浓度作为前列腺癌患者骨转移的定量标志物。
Cancer. 1997 Nov 1;80(9):1760-7.
8
Biochemical picture of bone metabolism in breast cancer patients with bone metastases.伴有骨转移的乳腺癌患者骨代谢的生化情况
Anticancer Res. 1995 Nov-Dec;15(6B):2871-5.
9
MMP-2, MMP-9 and activin A blood levels in patients with breast cancer or prostate cancer metastatic to the bone.发生骨转移的乳腺癌或前列腺癌患者的血液中基质金属蛋白酶-2、基质金属蛋白酶-9和激活素A水平
Anticancer Res. 2007 May-Jun;27(3B):1519-25.
10
The relative use of eight collagenous and noncollagenous markers for diagnosis of skeletal metastases in breast, prostate, or lung cancer patients.八种胶原和非胶原标志物在乳腺癌、前列腺癌或肺癌患者骨转移诊断中的相对应用。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Jan;15(1):32-8. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0492.

引用本文的文献

1
Potential biomarkers for the early detection of bone metastases.用于早期检测骨转移的潜在生物标志物。
Front Oncol. 2023 Jun 19;13:1188357. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1188357. eCollection 2023.
2
Biomaterials for Mimicking and Modelling Tumor Microenvironment.用于模拟和建模肿瘤微环境的生物材料。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2022;1379:139-170. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-04039-9_6.
3
Efficacy of Paclitaxel Combined with Kanglaite Injection in Treatment of Bone Metastases of Lung Cancer.紫杉醇联合康莱特注射液治疗肺癌骨转移的疗效
Iran J Public Health. 2019 Aug;48(8):1445-1451.
4
Diagnostic and prognostic validity of serum bone turnover markers in bone metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients.血清骨转换标志物在骨转移性非小细胞肺癌患者中的诊断和预后有效性
J Bone Oncol. 2015 Sep 30;4(3):85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2015.09.003. eCollection 2015 Sep.
5
Biochemical markers of bone turnover and clinical outcome in patients with renal cell and bladder carcinoma with bone metastases following treatment with zoledronic acid: The TUGAMO study.唑来膦酸治疗后伴骨转移的肾细胞癌和膀胱癌患者的骨转换生化标志物与临床结局:TUGAMO 研究。
Br J Cancer. 2013 Jul 9;109(1):121-30. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.272. Epub 2013 Jun 25.