Sripunya Nucharin, Somfai Tamás, Inaba Yasushi, Nagai Takashi, Imai Kei, Parnpai Rangsun
Embryo Technology and Stem Cell Research Center, Suranaree University of Technology, Japan.
J Reprod Dev. 2010 Feb;56(1):176-81. doi: 10.1262/jrd.09-108h. Epub 2009 Oct 8.
The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacies of the cooling systems of the solid surface (SSV) and Cryotop vitrification methods for cryopreservation of bovine oocytes at the metaphase II stage. The effects of vitrification on oocyte viability, in vitro fertilization (IVF), pronucleus formation and subsequent in vitro development were assessed. In vitro matured (IVM) bovine oocytes were subjected to equilibration and vitrification solutions according to the SSV method, and then the oocytes were vitrified either by dropping onto a cold dry metal surface (SSV group) or by plunging into liquid nitrogen on Cryotop sheets (Cryotop group). Warming was conducted according to the SSV method. Some oocytes were subjected to the cryoprotectants and warming regimen without cooling (Solution control group). The live/dead status of oocytes was evaluated by fluorescein diacetate staining. Live oocytes were subjected to IVF, and the resultant embryos were cultured in vitro. The rates of live oocytes were similar among the Fresh control, Solution control, SSV and Cryotop groups. There was no difference in the rates of fertilization, pronuclear formation and monospermy among these groups. The cleavage rates in the SSV and Cryotop groups (41.6 and 53.2%, respectively) were significantly lower than those in the Fresh control and Solution control groups (65.9 and 61.3%, respectively). The blastocyst rates in SSV and Cryotop groups did not differ (10.3 and 12.8%, respectively); however, they were significantly lower than those in the Fresh control and Solution control groups (36.4 and 24.8%, respectively). The inner cell mass, trophectoderm and total cell numbers in blastocysts did not differ significantly among the Fresh control, Solution control, SSV and Cryotop groups. Our results indicate that IVM bovine oocytes could be cryopreserved successfully using the cooling systems of the Cryotop and Solid Surface Vitrification methods with similar efficacy.
本研究的目的是比较固体表面(SSV)冷却系统和Cryotop玻璃化方法对牛中期II期卵母细胞冷冻保存的效果。评估了玻璃化对卵母细胞活力、体外受精(IVF)、原核形成及随后的体外发育的影响。体外成熟(IVM)的牛卵母细胞按照SSV方法接受平衡液和玻璃化溶液处理,然后通过滴加到冷的干燥金属表面(SSV组)或投入Cryotop载片上的液氮中(Cryotop组)进行玻璃化。按照SSV方法进行复温。一些卵母细胞接受冷冻保护剂和复温方案但不进行冷却(溶液对照组)。通过荧光素二乙酸酯染色评估卵母细胞的活/死状态。存活的卵母细胞进行IVF,所得胚胎进行体外培养。新鲜对照组、溶液对照组、SSV组和Cryotop组之间存活卵母细胞的比例相似。这些组之间的受精率、原核形成率和单精受精率没有差异。SSV组和Cryotop组的卵裂率(分别为41.6%和53.2%)显著低于新鲜对照组和溶液对照组(分别为65.9%和61.3%)。SSV组和Cryotop组的囊胚率没有差异(分别为10.3%和12.8%);然而,它们显著低于新鲜对照组和溶液对照组(分别为36.4%和24.8%)。新鲜对照组、溶液对照组、SSV组和Cryotop组之间囊胚的内细胞团、滋养外胚层和总细胞数没有显著差异。我们的结果表明,使用Cryotop和固体表面玻璃化方法的冷却系统可以成功冷冻保存IVM牛卵母细胞,且效果相似。