Suppr超能文献

成人前肩不稳的手术干预措施。

Surgical interventions for anterior shoulder instability in adults.

作者信息

Pulavarti Ramnadh S, Symes Tom H, Rangan Amar

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sharoe Green Lane, Preston, Lancashire, UK, PR2 9HT.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7(4):CD005077. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005077.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The shoulder is the most common joint to develop recurrent instability. Repair of labral tears of the joint and reconstruction of damaged capsule and torn ligaments either by open or arthroscopic methods remain the cornerstone of current management.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness of various surgical interventions performed to treat recurrent anterior instability of the shoulder in adults.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (December 2007), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2008, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1950 to March 2008), EMBASE and other databases. We searched conference proceedings and the reference lists of papers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing different surgical interventions for treating anterior shoulder instability in adults.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The authors independently selected trials, assessed methodological quality and extracted data. Only limited pooling was done.

MAIN RESULTS

Included are three randomised controlled trials involving 184 people (predominantly active young men) with unidirectional anterior shoulder instability generally following a traumatic event. All three trials compared arthroscopic versus open surgery, generally involving the repair of Bankart lesions. The three trials were inadequately reported but appeared well-conducted with minimum follow-ups of two years.Pooled results showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups in recurrent instability or re-injury (7/92 versus 5/85, risk ratio (RR) 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09 to 8.72; random-effects model), in subsequent instability-related surgery (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.05 to 8.97; random-effects model) or surgery for all reasons (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.04 to 7.18; random-effects model). For other outcomes, including shoulder function, there were either no statistically significant differences between the two groups or the differences were clinically insignificant where statistically significant differences occurred.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence from randomised trials comparing arthroscopic with open surgery for treating anterior shoulder instability. Further research is needed on this subject and for other surgical interventions. Sufficiently powered, good quality, well reported randomised controlled trials with validated outcome measures and long-term follow up are required.

摘要

背景

肩部是最常发生复发性不稳定的关节。通过开放手术或关节镜手术修复关节盂唇撕裂以及重建受损的关节囊和撕裂的韧带仍然是当前治疗的基石。

目的

比较各种手术干预措施治疗成人复发性肩关节前不稳定的有效性。

检索策略

我们检索了Cochrane骨、关节与肌肉创伤小组专业注册库(2007年12月)、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(《Cochrane图书馆》2008年第1期)、MEDLINE(1950年至2008年3月)、EMBASE及其他数据库。我们检索了会议论文集和论文的参考文献列表。

选择标准

比较不同手术干预措施治疗成人肩关节前不稳定的随机或半随机对照试验。

数据收集与分析

作者独立选择试验、评估方法学质量并提取数据。仅进行了有限的汇总分析。

主要结果

纳入了三项随机对照试验,涉及184例(主要是活跃的年轻男性)通常在创伤事件后发生单向肩关节前不稳定的患者。所有三项试验均比较了关节镜手术与开放手术,通常涉及Bankart损伤的修复。这三项试验报告不充分,但开展情况良好,最短随访期为两年。汇总结果显示,两组在复发性不稳定或再次受伤方面无统计学显著差异(92例中的7例与85例中的5例,风险比(RR)0.89,95%置信区间(CI)0.09至8.72;随机效应模型),在随后与不稳定相关的手术方面(RR 0.66,95%CI 0.05至8.97;随机效应模型)或所有原因导致的手术方面(RR 0.55,95%CI 0.04至7.18;随机效应模型)。对于其他结局,包括肩部功能,两组之间要么无统计学显著差异,要么在出现统计学显著差异时,差异在临床上无意义。

作者结论

关于比较关节镜手术与开放手术治疗肩关节前不稳定的随机试验,证据不足。需要对该主题以及其他手术干预措施进行进一步研究。需要开展有足够效力、高质量、报告良好的随机对照试验,并采用经过验证的结局指标和长期随访。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验