Buehler Center on Aging, Health and Society, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA.
J Palliat Med. 2010 Feb;13(2):161-9. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2009.0170.
A comprehensive whole-person approach might improve processes and outcomes of care for patients with cancer.
To assess the ability of NEST13+ (Needs of a social nature; Existential concerns; Symptoms; and Therapeutic interaction), a screening and assessment tool, to identify social, emotional, physical, and care-system needs and to improve clinical outcomes for cancer patients in tertiary care.
DESIGN, SETTING, PATIENTS: A controlled trial involving 451 patients hospitalized for cancer care at a comprehensive cancer center.
Patients responded to 13 screening questions regarding possible care needs. When an individual response exceeded threshold levels, additional in-depth questions for the relevant need were asked. For patients in the intervention arm, clinical recommendations for each dimension of need were generated based on a previously developed NEST-response-driven menu, and were reported to the clinical team.
Documented needs, clinician response, patient perception of goals alignment, and overall quality of palliative care.
Using the NEST13+ tool in the clinical setting facilitated greater documentation of illness-related needs than routine clinical assessment. Improvement in secondary outcomes was attenuated: changes in the clinician response were modest; changes in outcomes were not significant.
The NEST13+ tool facilitated identification of a wider range of important needs than traditional evaluation, while care outcomes were not improved. Traditional evaluation may need improvement. Future trials of the NEST13+ should focus on more intensive clinician-directed interventions.
全面的整体人方法可能会改善癌症患者的护理流程和结果。
评估 NEST13+(社会需求;存在问题;症状;治疗互动)作为一种筛查和评估工具,识别癌症患者的社会、情感、身体和护理系统需求的能力,并改善他们在三级护理中的临床结局。
设计、地点、患者:一项涉及在综合性癌症中心住院治疗的 451 名癌症患者的对照试验。
患者对 13 个关于可能的护理需求的筛查问题做出回应。当个人的反应超过阈值水平时,会询问与相关需求相关的深入问题。对于干预组的患者,根据之前开发的 NEST 反应驱动菜单,为每个需求维度生成临床建议,并向临床团队报告。
记录需求、临床医生的反应、患者对目标一致性的感知,以及整体姑息治疗质量。
在临床环境中使用 NEST13+工具比常规临床评估更能促进与疾病相关的需求的记录。次要结局的改善减弱:临床医生反应的变化不大;结果的变化不显著。
NEST13+工具促进了比传统评估更广泛的重要需求的识别,而护理结局没有得到改善。传统评估可能需要改进。未来的 NEST13+试验应侧重于更密集的临床医生指导干预。