Irfaq Muhammad, Ajab Mir, Khattak Gul Sanat Shah, Mohammad Tila, Shah Syed Jawad Ahmad
Nuclear Institute for Food and Agriculture, Peshawar, N.W.F.P., Pakistan.
Phytopathology. 2009 Nov;99(11):1265-72. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-99-11-1265.
Genetic effects on controlling resistance to stripe rust (Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici Eriksson)were determined in two wheat crosses, Bakhtawar-92 (B-92) x Frontana and Inqilab-91 x Fakhre Sarhad using area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) as a measure of stripe rust resistance. The resistant and susceptible parents involved in developing genetic populations were identified by initial assessment of 45 wheat accessions for stripe rust reaction. Mixed inheritance model was applied to the data analysis of six basic populations (P(1), F(1), P(2), B(1), B(2), and F(2)) in the crosses. The results indicated that AUDPC in cross 1 was controlled by two major genes with additive-dominance epistatic effect plus polygenes with additive-dominance-epistatic effects (model E) whereas, in the case of cross 2, it was under the control of two major genes with additive-dominance epistatic effect plus additive-dominant polygenes (model E-1). Additive effect was predominant over all other types of genetic effects, suggesting that the delay in selection for resistance until maximum favorable genes are accumulated in the individuals is desired. The tendency of backcrosses toward their respective pollen donor parents indicated the control of resistance through nuclear genes rather than the cytoplasmic factors. Occurrence of resistant as well as susceptible transgressive segregates (though very few in F(2) for each cross) indicated the presence of favorable as well as some adverse genes for resistance to stripe rust in the parents. The major gene heritability was higher than that of the polygene in B(1), B(2), and F(2) for the crosses. The major gene as well as the polygene heritability was 48.99 to 87.12% and 2.26 to 36.80% for the two crosses, respectively. The highest phenotypic variations in AUDPC (2,504.10 to 5,833.14) for segregating progenies (B(1), B(2), and F(2)) represent that the character was highly influenced by the environment. The experimental results of the two crosses indicate that resistance to stripe rust is under control of two major genes in association with several polygene rather than cytoplasmic inheritance.
在两个小麦杂交组合Bakhtawar - 92(B - 92)×Frontana和Inqilab - 91×Fakhre Sarhad中,以病害进展曲线下面积(AUDPC)作为条锈病抗性的衡量指标,测定了控制条锈病抗性(条形柄锈菌小麦专化型Eriksson)的遗传效应。通过对45份小麦材料的条锈病反应进行初步评估,确定了用于构建遗传群体的抗性和感病亲本。混合遗传模型应用于杂交组合中六个基本群体(P(1)、F(1)、P(2)、B(1)、B(2)和F(2))的数据分析。结果表明,杂交组合1中的AUDPC受两个具有加性 - 显性上位效应的主基因以及具有加性 - 显性 - 上位效应的多基因控制(模型E);而在杂交组合2中,它受两个具有加性 - 显性上位效应的主基因以及加性 - 显性多基因控制(模型E - 1)。加性效应在所有其他类型的遗传效应中占主导地位,这表明在个体积累到最大数量的有利基因之前,延迟对抗性的选择是可取的。回交向各自花粉供体亲本的趋势表明抗性是由核基因而非细胞质因子控制。抗性和感病超亲分离株的出现(尽管每个杂交组合的F(2)中数量很少)表明亲本中存在条锈病抗性的有利基因以及一些不利基因。在杂交组合的B(1)、B(2)和F(2)中,主基因遗传力高于多基因遗传力。两个杂交组合中,主基因遗传力和多基因遗传力分别为48.99%至87.12%和2.26%至36.80%。分离后代(B(1)、B(2)和F(2))的AUDPC中最高的表型变异(2,504.10至5,833.14)表明该性状受环境影响很大。两个杂交组合的实验结果表明,条锈病抗性受两个主基因与多个多基因的共同控制,而非细胞质遗传。