Suppr超能文献

注射器和药瓶与预填充胰岛素笔(FlexPen)的操作和准确性比较。

A comparison of the handling and accuracy of syringe and vial versus prefilled insulin pen (FlexPen).

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Niigata University of Pharmacy and Applied Life Sciences, Niigata, Japan.

出版信息

Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Oct;11(10):657-61. doi: 10.1089/dia.2009.0006.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To determine the preferable method for self-injecting insulin, we compared the handling, safety, and dose accuracy of a conventional disposable syringe and vial with FlexPen (Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark), a prefilled pen.

METHODS

Insulin therapy-naive healthcare professionals (HCPs) (n = 30), unfamiliar with insulin delivery, injected 10 U of insulin into a sponge pad using either a syringe and vial or the FlexPen, both with 30-gauge 8-mm needles, on day 1. The following day, they used the alternative method. They evaluated the handling of the two methods on device-specific questionnaires and compared overall preference on a third questionnaire. To evaluate dose accuracy, 30 insulin therapy-experienced HCPs and 20 insulin therapy-naive HCPs were asked to deliver 10 U of insulin using each method, and the amount discharged was weighed.

RESULTS

FlexPen was rated easier to use and overall more preferable than the syringe and vial by insulin therapy-naive HCPs (P < 0.001). The pen device was more accurate than the syringe and vial when used by experienced HCPs (mean +/- SD dose delivered, 9.91 +/- 0.11 U vs. 9.82 +/- 0.25 U, respectively; P < 0.001) and by insulin therapy-naive HCPs (9.91 +/- 0.12 U vs. 9.74 +/- 0.85 U; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Insulin therapy-naive HCPs found FlexPen easier to handle and preferable to use compared to a conventional syringe and vial. Both insulin therapy-experienced and -naive HCPs were able to deliver insulin significantly more accurately with the FlexPen than with a syringe and vial (P < 0.001).

摘要

背景

为了确定自我注射胰岛素的更优方法,我们比较了传统一次性注射器和预填充笔(Novo Nordisk A/S,丹麦 Bagsvaerd)在操作、安全性和剂量准确性方面的差异。

方法

30 名未接受胰岛素治疗的医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)(n = 30),他们不熟悉胰岛素给药,使用 30G 8mm 针头的注射器和药瓶,或 FlexPen ,分别在第 1 天向海绵垫中注射 10U 胰岛素。第二天,他们使用另一种方法。他们使用特定于设备的问卷评估两种方法的操作,并在第三个问卷中比较总体偏好。为了评估剂量准确性,要求 30 名有胰岛素治疗经验的 HCPs 和 20 名无胰岛素治疗经验的 HCPs 分别使用每种方法注射 10U 胰岛素,并称重排出的胰岛素量。

结果

无胰岛素治疗经验的 HCPs 认为 FlexPen 比注射器和药瓶更容易使用,总体上更受青睐(P < 0.001)。有经验的 HCPs 和无胰岛素治疗经验的 HCPs 使用笔式装置时比使用注射器和药瓶时更准确(分别为平均 +/- SD 剂量输送,9.91 +/- 0.11U 与 9.82 +/- 0.25U;P < 0.001)。

结论

与传统注射器和药瓶相比,无胰岛素治疗经验的 HCPs 发现 FlexPen 更容易操作,使用更方便。有经验和无经验的 HCPs 都能使用 FlexPen 比使用注射器和药瓶更准确地输送胰岛素(P < 0.001)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验