• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋部骨折患者的护理质量与 30 天死亡率:一项全国性队列研究。

Quality of care and 30 day mortality among patients with hip fractures: a nationwide cohort study.

机构信息

Danish Institute for Quality and Accreditation in Healthcare, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Oct 12;9:186. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-186.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-9-186
PMID:19822018
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2768699/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We examined the association between quality of care and 30 day mortality in a nationwide cohort of patients hospitalized with hip fracture.

METHODS

We used data from The Danish National Indicator Project, a quality improvement initiative with participation of more than 90% of Danish hospital departments caring for patients with hip fracture between August 16, 2005 and August 15, 2006. Quality of care was measured in terms of meeting five specific criteria: early assessment of the patient's nutritional risk, systematic pain assessment during mobilization, assessment of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) before the fracture, assessment of ADL before discharge, and initiation of treatment to prevent future osteoporotic fractures. The association between meeting each of the quality of care criteria for the patient and 30 day mortality was examined using logistic regression to adjust for potential confounders.

RESULTS

6,266 patients hospitalized with an incident episode of hip fracture were included in the study. For four of the five quality of care criteria, patients who met the criterion had substantially lower 30 day mortality after hip fracture. The adjusted mortality odds ratios (ORs) ranged from 0.42 (95% CI, 0.30 to 0.58) for assessment of ADL before discharge (excluding deaths during hospitalization) to 0.72 (95% CI, 0.52 to 1.00) for systematic pain assessment. We found an inverse dose-response relationship between the number of quality of care criteria met and 30 day mortality; the lowest mortality was found among patients for whom all five quality of care criteria were met, as compared with patients for whom no quality of care criteria were met: adjusted mortality OR 0.18 (95% CI, 0.09 to 0.36).

CONCLUSION

Higher quality of care during hospitalization with hip fracture was associated with lowered 30 day mortality.

摘要

背景

我们研究了在全国范围内髋部骨折住院患者队列中,医疗质量与 30 天死亡率之间的关系。

方法

我们使用了丹麦国家指标项目的数据,这是一项质量改进计划,参与了 2005 年 8 月 16 日至 2006 年 8 月 15 日期间丹麦 90%以上的髋部骨折患者治疗科室。医疗质量是通过满足五个特定标准来衡量的:对患者营养风险的早期评估、在活动时进行系统的疼痛评估、骨折前评估日常生活活动(ADL)、出院前评估 ADL 以及开始治疗以预防未来的骨质疏松性骨折。使用逻辑回归来调整潜在的混杂因素,研究了满足每位患者的医疗质量标准与 30 天死亡率之间的关联。

结果

本研究共纳入了 6266 名因髋部骨折住院的患者。对于五个质量标准中的四个,满足标准的患者在髋部骨折后 30 天死亡率明显较低。调整后的死亡率比值比(OR)范围从出院前评估 ADL(不包括住院期间死亡)的 0.42(95%可信区间,0.30 至 0.58)到系统疼痛评估的 0.72(95%可信区间,0.52 至 1.00)。我们发现,满足的质量标准数量与 30 天死亡率之间呈反比剂量反应关系;与未满足任何质量标准的患者相比,满足所有五个质量标准的患者的死亡率最低:调整后的死亡率 OR 0.18(95%可信区间,0.09 至 0.36)。

结论

髋部骨折住院期间的医疗质量越高,30 天死亡率越低。

相似文献

1
Quality of care and 30 day mortality among patients with hip fractures: a nationwide cohort study.髋部骨折患者的护理质量与 30 天死亡率:一项全国性队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Oct 12;9:186. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-186.
2
Off-hours admission and quality of hip fracture care: a nationwide cohort study of performance measures and 30-day mortality.非工作时间入院与髋部骨折护理质量:一项关于绩效指标和30天死亡率的全国性队列研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Jun;28(3):324-31. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw037. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
3
Socioeconomic inequality in clinical outcome among hip fracture patients: a nationwide cohort study.髋部骨折患者临床结局的社会经济不平等:一项全国性队列研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Apr;28(4):1233-1243. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3853-7. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
4
Is the higher mortality among men with hip fracture explained by sex-related differences in quality of in-hospital care? A population-based cohort study.髋部骨折男性较高的死亡率是否可由住院治疗质量的性别差异来解释?一项基于人群的队列研究。
Age Ageing. 2017 Mar 1;46(2):193-199. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw225.
5
High quality of care did not imply increased hospital spending- nationwide cohort study among hip fracture patients.高质量的护理并不意味着增加医院的支出——全国范围内髋部骨折患者的队列研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Aug 1;31(7):22-29. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy243.
6
Regaining pre-fracture basic mobility status after hip fracture and association with post-discharge mortality and readmission-a nationwide register study in Denmark.髋部骨折后恢复骨折前基本活动能力状况及其与出院后死亡率和再入院的关系:丹麦全国登记研究。
Age Ageing. 2019 Mar 1;48(2):278-284. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afy185.
7
Effect of the Dutch Hip Fracture Audit implementation on mortality, length of hospital stay and time until surgery in elderly hip fracture patients; a multi-center cohort study.荷兰髋部骨折审核实施对老年髋部骨折患者死亡率、住院时间和手术时间的影响:一项多中心队列研究。
Injury. 2020 Apr;51(4):1038-1044. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.02.084. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
8
Quality of care and mortality among patients with stroke: a nationwide follow-up study.中风患者的医疗质量与死亡率:一项全国性随访研究。
Med Care. 2008 Jan;46(1):63-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181484b91.
9
Are process performance measures associated with clinical outcomes among patients with hip fractures? A population-based cohort study.髋部骨折患者的过程绩效指标与临床结局相关吗?一项基于人群的队列研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Dec 1;28(6):698-708. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw093.
10
Can improved quality of care explain the success of orthogeriatric units? A population-based cohort study.护理质量的提高能否解释老年骨科单元的成功?一项基于人群的队列研究。
Age Ageing. 2016 Jan;45(1):66-71. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv155. Epub 2015 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Which performance indicators are used globally for evaluating healthcare in patients with a hip fracture? : a mixed methods systematic review.全球用于评估髋部骨折患者医疗保健的绩效指标有哪些?:一项混合方法的系统评价。
Bone Jt Open. 2025 Mar 6;6(3):275-290. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0104.R1.
2
Clinical outcomes of non-COVID-19 orthopaedic patients admitted during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multi-centre interrupted time series analysis across hospitals in six different countries.COVID-19 大流行期间收治的非 COVID-19 骨科患者的临床结局:六个不同国家医院间的多中心中断时间序列分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 4;13(9):e073276. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073276.
3
Are hip fracture patients with high or low body mass index at higher risk of missed care? A cohort study.髋部骨折患者的身体质量指数(BMI)较高或较低是否存在更高的漏诊风险?一项队列研究。
Nurs Open. 2023 Jul;10(7):4452-4460. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1687. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
4
Patient-related healthcare disparities in the quality of acute hip fracture care: a 10-year nationwide population-based cohort study.患者相关的医疗保健差距对急性髋部骨折护理质量的影响:一项为期 10 年的全国范围基于人群的队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 30;11(12):e051424. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051424.
5
The association between first-time accreditation and the delivery of recommended care: a before and after study in the Faroe Islands.首次认证与推荐护理的提供之间的关联:法罗群岛的前后研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 5;21(1):917. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06952-w.
6
Poor adherence to guidelines in treatment of fragile and cognitively impaired patients with hip fracture: a descriptive study of 2,804 patients.髋部骨折的脆弱和认知功能受损患者治疗中对指南的依从性差:2804 例患者的描述性研究。
Acta Orthop. 2021 Oct;92(5):544-550. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1925430. Epub 2021 May 12.
7
Textbook process as a composite quality indicator for in-hospital hip fracture care.教科书式流程作为院内髋部骨折护理的综合质量指标。
Arch Osteoporos. 2021 Apr 8;16(1):63. doi: 10.1007/s11657-021-00909-6.
8
Post-discharge complications in postoperative patients with hip fracture.髋部骨折术后患者出院后的并发症
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Oct 24;14:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.10.045. eCollection 2021 Mar.
9
Antibiotic prophylaxis as a quality of care indicator: does it help in the fight against surgical site infections following fragility hip fractures?抗生素预防作为医疗质量指标:它对抗脆性髋部骨折术后手术部位感染有帮助吗?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Feb;142(2):239-245. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03682-2. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
10
One-year postoperative mortality rate among the elderly with hip fractures at a single tertiary care center.一家三级医疗中心老年髋部骨折患者一年术后死亡率。
Ann Saudi Med. 2020 Jul-Aug;40(4):298-304. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2020.298. Epub 2020 Aug 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient risk factors, operative care, and outcomes among older community-dwelling male veterans with hip fracture.老年社区居住男性退伍军人髋部骨折患者的危险因素、手术治疗及预后
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Jan;90(1):34-42. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00065.
2
Quality of care and mortality among patients with stroke: a nationwide follow-up study.中风患者的医疗质量与死亡率:一项全国性随访研究。
Med Care. 2008 Jan;46(1):63-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181484b91.
3
Pain perception during the rehabilitation phase following traumatic hip fracture in the elderly is an important prognostic factor and treatment tool.老年人创伤性髋部骨折康复期的疼痛感知是一个重要的预后因素和治疗工具。
Disabil Rehabil. 2007 Apr 30;29(8):651-8. doi: 10.1080/09638280600926470.
4
The Danish Civil Registration System. A cohort of eight million persons.丹麦民事登记系统。一个由800万人组成的队列。
Dan Med Bull. 2006 Nov;53(4):441-9.
5
Reduced morbidity for elderly patients with a hip fracture after implementation of a perioperative evidence-based clinical pathway.实施围手术期循证临床路径后,老年髋部骨折患者的发病率降低。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Oct;15(5):375-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.017095.
6
Effect of inpatient quality of care on functional outcomes in patients with hip fracture.髋部骨折患者住院护理质量对功能结局的影响。
Med Care. 2006 Sep;44(9):862-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000223738.34872.6a.
7
Fighting infections with vitamin D.用维生素D对抗感染。
Nat Med. 2006 Apr;12(4):388-90. doi: 10.1038/nm0406-388.
8
Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and the risk of fractures.补充钙加维生素D与骨折风险
N Engl J Med. 2006 Feb 16;354(7):669-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa055218.
9
Does standardized rehabilitation and discharge planning improve functional recovery in elderly patients with hip fracture?标准化康复及出院计划能否改善老年髋部骨折患者的功能恢复情况?
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Dec;86(12):2231-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.06.019.
10
Effect of comorbidities and postoperative complications on mortality after hip fracture in elderly people: prospective observational cohort study.共病和术后并发症对老年髋部骨折患者死亡率的影响:前瞻性观察队列研究
BMJ. 2005 Dec 10;331(7529):1374. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38643.663843.55. Epub 2005 Nov 18.