• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Sample size recalculation in sequential diagnostic trials.序贯诊断试验中的样本量重算。
Biostatistics. 2010 Jan;11(1):151-63. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxp044. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
2
A comparison of confidence/credible interval methods for the area under the ROC curve for continuous diagnostic tests with small sample size.小样本量连续诊断试验中ROC曲线下面积的置信/可信区间方法比较
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Dec;26(6):2603-2621. doi: 10.1177/0962280215602040. Epub 2015 Aug 30.
3
Tests of equivalence and non-inferiority for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired areas under ROC curves.基于ROC曲线下配对面积的诊断准确性等效性和非劣效性检验。
Stat Med. 2006 Apr 15;25(7):1219-38. doi: 10.1002/sim.2358.
4
Sample size calculation for comparing two ROC curves.比较两条 ROC 曲线的样本量计算。
Pharm Stat. 2024 Jul-Aug;23(4):557-569. doi: 10.1002/pst.2371. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
5
Group sequential design for comparative diagnostic accuracy studies.用于比较诊断准确性研究的序贯设计组。
Stat Med. 2003 Mar 15;22(5):727-39. doi: 10.1002/sim.1386.
6
Many-to-one comparison after sample size reestimation for trials with multiple treatment arms and treatment selection.对具有多个治疗组和治疗选择的试验进行样本量重新估计后的多对一比较。
J Biopharm Stat. 2010 Sep;20(5):927-40. doi: 10.1080/10543401003618959.
7
An adaptive approach to designing comparative diagnostic accuracy studies.一种用于设计比较诊断准确性研究的适应性方法。
J Biopharm Stat. 2008;18(1):116-25. doi: 10.1080/10543400701668282.
8
Sample size recalculation in multicenter randomized controlled clinical trials based on noncomparative data.基于非对照数据的多中心随机对照临床试验的样本量再估算。
Biom J. 2020 Sep;62(5):1284-1299. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201900138. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
9
Sample size re-estimation in paired comparative diagnostic accuracy studies with a binary response.具有二元响应的配对比较诊断准确性研究中的样本量重新估计
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Jul 14;17(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0386-5.
10
Increasing the sample size when the unblinded interim result is promising.当非盲法中期结果有希望时增加样本量。
Stat Med. 2004 Apr 15;23(7):1023-38. doi: 10.1002/sim.1688.

引用本文的文献

1
Group sequential testing of the predictive accuracy of a continuous biomarker with unknown prevalence.对患病率未知的连续生物标志物预测准确性进行序贯分组检验。
Stat Med. 2016 Apr 15;35(8):1267-80. doi: 10.1002/sim.6790. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
2
Asymptotic Properties of the Sequential Empirical ROC, PPV and NPV Curves Under Case-Control Sampling.病例对照抽样下序贯经验ROC、PPV和NPV曲线的渐近性质
Ann Stat. 2011;39(6):3234-3261. doi: 10.1214/11-AOS937.

本文引用的文献

1
Pivotal evaluation of the accuracy of a biomarker used for classification or prediction: standards for study design.用于分类或预测的生物标志物准确性的关键评估:研究设计标准
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Oct 15;100(20):1432-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn326. Epub 2008 Oct 7.
2
Nonparametric and semiparametric group sequential methods for comparing accuracy of diagnostic tests.用于比较诊断试验准确性的非参数和半参数序贯分组方法。
Biometrics. 2008 Dec;64(4):1137-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01000.x. Epub 2008 Mar 27.
3
An adaptive approach to designing comparative diagnostic accuracy studies.一种用于设计比较诊断准确性研究的适应性方法。
J Biopharm Stat. 2008;18(1):116-25. doi: 10.1080/10543400701668282.
4
Frequentist evaluation of group sequential clinical trial designs.成组序贯临床试验设计的频率学派评估
Stat Med. 2007 Dec 10;26(28):5047-80. doi: 10.1002/sim.2901.
5
Two-stage sample size re-estimation based on a nuisance parameter: a review.基于干扰参数的两阶段样本量重新估计:综述
J Biopharm Stat. 2005;15(4):559-74. doi: 10.1081/BIP-200062852.
6
Group sequential design for comparative diagnostic accuracy studies.用于比较诊断准确性研究的序贯设计组。
Stat Med. 2003 Mar 15;22(5):727-39. doi: 10.1002/sim.1386.
7
Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer.用于癌症早期检测的生物标志物开发阶段。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Jul 18;93(14):1054-61. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.14.1054.
8
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积的意义及应用。
Radiology. 1982 Apr;143(1):29-36. doi: 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747.
9
Sample size determination for group sequential clinical trials with immediate response.具有即时反应的序贯临床试验的样本量确定
Stat Med. 1992 Jul;11(10):1391-9. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780111012.

序贯诊断试验中的样本量重算。

Sample size recalculation in sequential diagnostic trials.

机构信息

Department of Statistics, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.

出版信息

Biostatistics. 2010 Jan;11(1):151-63. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxp044. Epub 2009 Oct 12.

DOI:10.1093/biostatistics/kxp044
PMID:19822693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2800369/
Abstract

Before a comparative diagnostic trial is carried out, maximum sample sizes for the diseased group and the nondiseased group need to be obtained to achieve a nominal power to detect a meaningful difference in diagnostic accuracy. Sample size calculation depends on the variance of the statistic of interest, which is the difference between receiver operating characteristic summary measures of 2 medical diagnostic tests. To obtain an appropriate value for the variance, one often has to assume an arbitrary parametric model and the associated parameter values for the 2 groups of subjects under 2 tests to be compared. It becomes more tedious to do so when the same subject undergoes 2 different tests because the correlation is then involved in modeling the test outcomes. The calculated variance based on incorrectly specified parametric models may be smaller than the true one, which will subsequently result in smaller maximum sample sizes, leaving the study underpowered. In this paper, we develop a nonparametric adaptive method for comparative diagnostic trials to update the sample sizes using interim data, while allowing early stopping during interim analyses. We show that the proposed method maintains the nominal power and type I error rate through theoretical proofs and simulation studies.

摘要

在进行对比诊断试验之前,需要获得患病组和非患病组的最大样本量,以达到检测诊断准确性有意义差异的名义功效。样本量的计算取决于感兴趣的统计量的方差,即两种医学诊断测试的接收者操作特性综合指标之间的差异。为了获得方差的适当值,通常必须为要比较的两组受试者假设一个任意的参数模型和相关参数值。当同一受试者接受两种不同的测试时,情况会更加繁琐,因为相关性会涉及到测试结果的建模。基于不正确指定的参数模型计算的方差可能会小于真实值,这将导致最大样本量更小,研究结果缺乏功效。在本文中,我们开发了一种用于对比诊断试验的非参数自适应方法,通过使用中期数据来更新样本量,同时允许在中期分析期间提前停止。我们通过理论证明和模拟研究表明,所提出的方法通过理论证明和模拟研究保持了名义功效和Ⅰ型错误率。