• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根的机械性能与预制纤维桩的结合。

Mechanical properties of roots combined with prefabricated fiber post.

机构信息

Department of Dental Materials Science, Tokyo Dental College, Mihama-ku, Chiba 261-8502, Japan.

出版信息

Dent Mater J. 2009 Sep;28(5):537-43. doi: 10.4012/dmj.28.537.

DOI:10.4012/dmj.28.537
PMID:19822983
Abstract

This study examined the mechanical properties of roots combined with prefabricated fiber post. Three types of specimens were evaluated: (1) prefabricated fiber post alone (FP); (2) core composite resin with FP (CFP); and (3) root with CFP (RCFP). The volume fractions of the prefabricated fiber post in the core composite resin (FP/CFP ratio) were set to 0, 0.16, 0.22, 0.28, and 0.48. Bending test for FP and CFP, and diametral compression test for FP, CFP, and RCFP were carried out. The FP/CFP ratio showed no effect on the diametral tensile strength (DTS) of RCFP; and there were no significant differences in DTS with/without FP. The flexural strength of CFP increased with increase in FP/CFP ratio. The DTS of CFP declined in comparison with that of core composite resin only.

摘要

本研究探讨了带预制纤维桩的牙根的机械性能。评估了三种类型的标本:(1)单独预制纤维桩(FP);(2)带有 FP 的核复合树脂(CFP);和(3)带有 CFP 的牙根(RCFP)。预制纤维桩在核复合树脂中的体积分数(FP/CFP 比)设置为 0、0.16、0.22、0.28 和 0.48。对 FP 和 CFP 进行弯曲试验,对 FP、CFP 和 RCFP 进行直径压缩试验。FP/CFP 比对 RCFP 的直径拉伸强度(DTS)没有影响;有/没有 FP 的 DTS 没有显著差异。CFP 的弯曲强度随 FP/CFP 比的增加而增加。与仅核复合树脂相比,CFP 的 DTS 下降。

相似文献

1
Mechanical properties of roots combined with prefabricated fiber post.根的机械性能与预制纤维桩的结合。
Dent Mater J. 2009 Sep;28(5):537-43. doi: 10.4012/dmj.28.537.
2
Fracture strength and nanoleakage of weakened roots reconstructed using relined glass fiber-reinforced dowels combined with a novel prefabricated core system.使用重衬玻璃纤维增强桩和新型预制核系统修复后的弱根的断裂强度和纳米渗漏。
J Prosthodont. 2014 Aug;23(6):484-94. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12139. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
3
Effect of reinforcement with resin composite on fracture strength of structurally compromised roots.树脂复合材料增强对结构受损根折裂强度的影响。
Dent Mater J. 2009 Sep;28(5):602-9. doi: 10.4012/dmj.28.602.
4
In vitro comparison of endodontic posts in structurally compromised roots of maxillary incisors.上颌切牙结构受损牙根中根管桩的体外比较
SADJ. 2011 Jun;66(5):220-3.
5
Durability of fiber-post and resin core build-up systems.纤维桩和树脂核增强系统的耐用性。
Dent Mater J. 2010 Mar;29(2):224-8. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2009-113.
6
Rigid versus flexible dentine-like endodontic posts--clinical testing of a biomechanical concept: seven-year results of a randomized controlled clinical pilot trial on endodontically treated abutment teeth with severe hard tissue loss.刚性与弹性牙本质状根管桩——生物力学概念的临床验证:一项针对伴有严重硬组织丧失的根管治疗基牙的随机对照临床前期试验七年结果。
J Endod. 2012 Dec;38(12):1557-63. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.08.015.
7
Diametral tensile strength of composite core material with cured and uncured fiber posts.具有固化和未固化纤维桩的复合核心材料的直径拉伸强度。
Gen Dent. 2011 Mar-Apr;59(2):125-8; quiz 129-30.
8
The influence of elastic modulus mismatch between tooth and post and core restorations on root fracture.牙与桩核修复体之间弹性模量不匹配对根折的影响。
Int Endod J. 2013 Jan;46(1):47-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02092.x. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
9
Diametral tensile strength of a resin composite core with nonmetallic prefabricated posts: an in vitro study.含非金属预制桩的树脂复合核的直径拉伸强度:一项体外研究
J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Apr;91(4):335-41. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.01.017.
10
The effect of post material on the characteristic strength of fatigued endodontically treated teeth.桩核材料对经根管治疗后疲劳牙齿特征强度的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Nov;112(5):1225-30. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.03.014. Epub 2014 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Reattachment of fractured maxillary incisors using fiber-reinforced post: Two case reports.使用纤维增强桩修复上颌前牙折断:两例病例报告。
Eur J Dent. 2012 Apr;6(2):227-33.