• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用和不使用溶剂去除牙胶后牙本质小管的清洁度:一项扫描电子显微镜研究

Cleanliness of dentinal tubules following gutta-percha removal with and without solvents: a scanning electron microscopic study.

作者信息

Horvath S D, Altenburger M J, Naumann M, Wolkewitz M, Schirrmeister J F

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, University School and Dental Hospital, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Int Endod J. 2009 Nov;42(11):1032-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01616.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01616.x
PMID:19825038
Abstract

AIM

To determine the influence of solvents on gutta-percha and sealer remaining on root canal walls and in dentinal tubules.

METHODOLOGY

The root canals of 70 teeth were prepared chemomechanically to apical size 40. In group 1 (n = 10; control group), the canals remained unfilled. In groups 2-4 (n = 20 each), the canals were filled using lateral compaction with gutta-percha and sealer. Removal of root fillings was undertaken after 2 weeks using Gates Glidden burs and hand files without solvent (group 2), with eucalyptol (60 microL; group 3) and with chloroform (60 microL; group 4) to size 50. After further irrigation using sodium hypochlorite and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, the roots were split, photographed and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed. The number of filled dentinal tubules (SEM) and the surface covered by root filling remnants (photographs) were evaluated for the coronal, middle and apical third of each root half. Statistical analysis was performed via mixed model for clustered data followed by Tukey's test.

RESULTS

After pooling the results of all thirds of the canal, open tubules were more prevalent in the control group, followed by the nonsolvent group, the eucalyptol group and the chloroform group (P < 0.05 between all groups). Less surface was covered by root filling remnants in the nonsolvent group than in the eucalyptol group and the chloroform group (P < 0.05); again, fewer remnants were found in the control group than in all other groups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Solvents led to more gutta-percha and sealer remnants on root canal walls and inside dentinal tubules.

摘要

目的

确定溶剂对残留在根管壁和牙本质小管内的牙胶和封闭剂的影响。

方法

对70颗牙齿的根管进行化学机械预备至根尖尺寸40。第1组(n = 10;对照组),根管未充填。第2 - 4组(每组n = 20),采用侧向加压法用牙胶和封闭剂充填根管。2周后,使用盖茨·格利登钻和手动锉去除根管充填物,第2组不使用溶剂,第3组使用桉叶油(60微升),第4组使用氯仿(60微升),预备至尺寸50。在进一步用次氯酸钠和乙二胺四乙酸冲洗后,将牙根劈开、拍照并进行扫描电子显微镜(SEM)检查。对每个牙根半侧的冠部、中部和根尖三分之一评估充填的牙本质小管数量(SEM)和被根管充填物残余覆盖的面积(照片)。通过聚类数据混合模型进行统计分析,随后进行Tukey检验。

结果

汇总根管所有三分之一的结果后,开放小管在对照组中更为普遍,其次是无溶剂组、桉叶油组和氯仿组(所有组之间P < 0.05)。无溶剂组被根管充填物残余覆盖的面积小于桉叶油组和氯仿组(P < 0.05);同样,对照组中发现的残余物少于所有其他组(P < 0.05)。

结论

溶剂导致根管壁和牙本质小管内残留更多的牙胶和封闭剂。

相似文献

1
Cleanliness of dentinal tubules following gutta-percha removal with and without solvents: a scanning electron microscopic study.使用和不使用溶剂去除牙胶后牙本质小管的清洁度:一项扫描电子显微镜研究
Int Endod J. 2009 Nov;42(11):1032-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01616.x.
2
Effectiveness of three different retreatment techniques in canals filled with compacted gutta-percha or Thermafil: a scanning electron microscope study.三种不同再治疗技术在充填有压实牙胶或热牙胶尖根管中的效果:一项扫描电子显微镜研究
J Endod. 2009 Oct;35(10):1433-40. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.06.002. Epub 2009 Aug 22.
3
Retreatment efficacy of hand versus automated instrumentation in oval-shaped root canals: an ex vivo study.椭圆形根管中手动与自动器械再治疗效果的体外研究
Int Endod J. 2006 Jul;39(7):521-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01100.x.
4
Efficacy of 3 techniques in removing root canal filling material.三种技术在去除根管充填材料方面的疗效。
J Can Dent Assoc. 2008 Oct;74(8):721.
5
Effectiveness of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments and a hand file for removing gutta-percha in severely curved root canals during retreatment: an ex vivo study.两种镍钛旋转器械和一种手动锉在根管再治疗中去除严重弯曲根管内牙胶的有效性:一项离体研究
Int Endod J. 2007 Jul;40(7):532-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01254.x. Epub 2007 May 18.
6
Effectiveness of HERO 642 versus Hedström files for removing gutta-percha fillings in curved root canals: an ex vivo study.HERO 642与Hedström锉在去除弯曲根管中牙胶充填物方面的有效性:一项体外研究。
Int Endod J. 2009 Nov;42(11):1050-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01624.x.
7
Efficacy, cleaning ability and safety of different rotary NiTi instruments in root canal retreatment.不同旋转镍钛器械在根管再治疗中的疗效、清洁能力及安全性
Int Endod J. 2004 Jul;37(7):468-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00823.x.
8
Comparative SEM evaluation of three solvents used in endodontic retreatment: an ex vivo study.三种用于根管再治疗的溶剂的扫描电子显微镜比较评估:一项体外研究。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2008 Jan-Feb;16(1):24-9. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572008000100006.
9
Residual filling material in dentinal tubules after gutta-percha removal observed with scanning electron microscopy.扫描电子显微镜观察到根管内牙本质小管内的残留充填料。
J Endod. 2012 Mar;38(3):293-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.11.016. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
10
Efficacy of ProTaper Universal rotary retreatment system for gutta-percha removal from root canals.ProTaper通用旋转再治疗系统从根管中去除牙胶的疗效。
Int Endod J. 2008 Apr;41(4):288-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01350.x. Epub 2007 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative efficacy of solvents in removing intratubular sealer during root canal retreatment: a CLSM and SEM study.根管再治疗期间溶剂去除根管内封闭剂的比较疗效:一项共聚焦激光扫描显微镜和扫描电子显微镜研究
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 26;25(1):1243. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06636-5.
2
Guided Endodontics for Non-surgical Root Canal Retreatment: A Systematic Review.非手术根管再治疗的引导性牙髓病治疗:一项系统评价
Iran Endod J. 2025;20(1):e3. doi: 10.22037/iej.v20i1.46903. Epub 2025 Jan 1.
3
Morphological Analysis and Bond Strength to Root Canal Dentin of Endodontically Treated and Retreated Teeth: An Ex Vivo Study.
根管治疗后和再治疗牙齿的形态分析及与根管牙本质的粘结强度:一项离体研究。
J Adhes Dent. 2024 Oct 14;26:231-240. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.b5780319.
4
Time Required for Root Canal Retreatment Using Continuous Rotation, Reciprocation, and Optimum Torque Reverse Motions: An In-Vitro Study.使用连续旋转、往复运动和最佳扭矩反向运动进行根管再治疗所需的时间:一项体外研究。
Cureus. 2024 Aug 26;16(8):e67786. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67786. eCollection 2024 Aug.
5
Effect of the filling technique on the filling removal from oval-shaped canals.充填技术对椭圆形根管内充填物去除的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Jul 27;28(8):453. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05853-6.
6
Optimizing Root Canal Therapy: An In Vitro Comparative Study of Innovative File Systems on Mandibular Premolar Fracture Resistance.优化根管治疗:创新锉系统对下颌前磨牙抗折性影响的体外对比研究
Cureus. 2024 Jun 10;16(6):e62077. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62077. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
Retreatability of NeoSEALER Flo obturated with warm vertical compaction versus single-cone technique using two different retreatment systems.使用两种不同再治疗系统,比较热垂直加压充填法与单尖法充填NeoSEALER Flo后的可再治疗性。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Mar;27(3):286-292. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_314_23. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
8
Comparing the softening effect of three gutta-percha solvents on different types of gutta-percha with different application durations.比较三种牙胶溶剂在不同应用时长下对不同类型牙胶的软化效果。
Saudi Dent J. 2024 Feb;36(2):281-285. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.10.025. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
9
Retreatment Strategies for Cases Containing Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealers: A Comprehensive Review.含硅酸钙类根管封闭剂病例的再治疗策略:一项综述
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Feb 18;12(2):41. doi: 10.3390/dj12020041.
10
Endodontic Orthograde Retreatments: Challenges and Solutions.牙髓正行再治疗:挑战与解决方案
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2023 Oct 24;15:245-265. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S397835. eCollection 2023.