Suppr超能文献

使用连续旋转、往复运动和最佳扭矩反向运动进行根管再治疗所需的时间:一项体外研究。

Time Required for Root Canal Retreatment Using Continuous Rotation, Reciprocation, and Optimum Torque Reverse Motions: An In-Vitro Study.

作者信息

Abboud Tarek, Al-Tayyan Mouhammad, Achour Hassan, Alsayed Tolibah Yasser

机构信息

Endodontics, Damascus University, Damascus, SYR.

Pediatric Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus, SYR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Aug 26;16(8):e67786. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67786. eCollection 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Objective This study aims to evaluate the time required for canal preparation using three different movement kinematics during retreatment: continuous rotational motion, reciprocating motion, and optimum torque reverse (OTR) motion. Materials and methods The sample comprised 45 single-canal mandibular first premolars. The crowns were sectioned to standardize the root length to 16 mm. The root canals were prepared using the AF Gold mechanical preparation system (25/06). The roots were obturated using the lateral condensation technique and kept at 100% humidity at 37°C for seven days. The sample was randomly divided based on the movement pattern used during retreatment into three groups (N = 15): group 1 is continuous rotational motion using the ProTaper Universal Retreatment system; group 2 is reciprocating motion using the WaveOne Gold system; and group 3 is OTR motion using the ProTaper Universal Retreatment system. The retreatment time was measured in seconds by summing two times: T1 (time to reach the apex) and T2 (time to achieve adequate cleaning). The data were statistically analyzed using a one-way ANOVA with a significance level of α = 0.05. Results The results showed that the time required for canal preparation during retreatment with WaveOne Gold files using reciprocating motion was significantly longer than the time needed with ProTaper Universal Retreatment files using continuous rotary motion or OTR motion (P < 0.05). Conclusions The use of OTR motion did not affect the canal preparation time when used with files designed for continuous rotary motion retreatment. The use of WaveOne Gold files for canal preparation during retreatment was associated with a longer working time than ProTaper Universal Retreatment files.

摘要

目的 本研究旨在评估根管再治疗过程中使用三种不同运动方式进行根管预备所需的时间:连续旋转运动、往复运动和最佳扭矩反转(OTR)运动。材料与方法 样本包括45颗单根管下颌第一前磨牙。将牙冠截断,使牙根长度标准化为16毫米。使用AF Gold机械预备系统(25/06)进行根管预备。采用侧向加压技术对牙根进行充填,并在37°C、湿度100%的条件下保存7天。根据再治疗过程中使用的运动模式将样本随机分为三组(N = 15):第1组使用ProTaper Universal再治疗系统进行连续旋转运动;第2组使用WaveOne Gold系统进行往复运动;第3组使用ProTaper Universal再治疗系统进行OTR运动。通过将两个时间相加来测量再治疗时间(以秒为单位):T1(到达根尖的时间)和T2(达到充分清洁的时间)。使用显著性水平α = 0.05的单因素方差分析对数据进行统计学分析。结果 结果表明,使用WaveOne Gold锉进行往复运动的根管再治疗过程中根管预备所需时间显著长于使用ProTaper Universal再治疗锉进行连续旋转运动或OTR运动所需的时间(P < 0.05)。结论 与专为连续旋转运动再治疗设计的锉配合使用时,OTR运动的使用不会影响根管预备时间。与ProTaper Universal再治疗锉相比,在根管再治疗过程中使用WaveOne Gold锉进行根管预备的工作时间更长。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验