Bratengeier Klaus, Oechsner Markus, Gainey Mark, Flentje Michael
Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, University of Würzburg Josef-Schneider-Str, 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
Radiat Oncol. 2009 Oct 14;4:44. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-4-44.
ICRU 50/62 provides a framework to facilitate the reporting of external beam radiotherapy treatments from different institutions. A predominant role is played by points that represent "the PTV dose". However, for new techniques like Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) - especially step and shoot IMRT - it is difficult to define a point whose dose can be called "characteristic" of the PTV dose distribution. Therefore different volume based methods of reporting of the prescribed dose are in use worldwide. Several of them were compared regarding their usability for IMRT and compatibility with the ICRU Reference Point dose for conformal radiotherapy (CRT) in this study.
The dose distributions of 45 arbitrarily chosen volumes treated by CRT plans and 57 volumes treated by IMRT plans were used for comparison. Some of the IMRT methods distinguish the planning target volume (PTV) and its central part PTVx (PTV minus a margin region of x mm). The reporting of dose prescriptions based on mean and median doses together with the dose to 95% of the considered volume (D95) were compared with each other and in respect of a prescription report with the aid of one or several possible ICRU Reference Points. The correlation between all methods was determined using the standard deviation of the ratio of all possible pairs of prescription reports. In addition the effects of boluses and the characteristics of simultaneous integrated boosts (SIB) were examined.
Two types of methods result in a high degree of consistency with the hitherto valid ICRU dose reporting concept: the median dose of the PTV and the mean dose to the central part of the PTV (PTVx). The latter is similar to the CTV, if no nested PTVs are used and no patient model surfaces are involved. A reporting of dose prescription using the CTV mean dose tends to overestimate the plateau doses of the lower dose plateaus of SIB plans. PTVx provides the possibility to approach biological effects using the standard deviation of the dose within this volume.
The authors advocate reporting the PTV median dose or preferably the mean dose of the central dose plateau PTVx as a potential replacement or successor of the ICRU Reference Dose - both usable for CRT and IMRT.
国际辐射单位与测量委员会(ICRU)第50/62号报告提供了一个框架,以促进不同机构对外照射放疗治疗情况的报告。代表“计划靶区(PTV)剂量”的点起着主要作用。然而,对于调强放疗(IMRT)等新技术——尤其是静态调强放疗——很难定义一个其剂量可被称为PTV剂量分布“特征性”的点。因此,全世界都在使用基于不同体积的规定剂量报告方法。在本研究中,对其中几种方法在IMRT中的可用性以及与ICRU适形放疗(CRT)参考点剂量的兼容性进行了比较。
使用45个由CRT计划治疗的任意选择体积以及57个由IMRT计划治疗的体积的剂量分布进行比较。一些IMRT方法区分计划靶区(PTV)及其中心部分PTVx(PTV减去x毫米的边缘区域)。将基于平均剂量和中位剂量以及所考虑体积的95%剂量(D95)的剂量处方报告相互比较,并与借助一个或几个可能的ICRU参考点的处方报告进行比较。使用所有可能的处方报告对的比率的标准差来确定所有方法之间的相关性。此外,还研究了 bolus的影响和同步整合加量(SIB)的特征。
两种类型的方法与迄今有效的ICRU剂量报告概念高度一致:PTV的中位剂量和PTV中心部分(PTVx)的平均剂量。如果不使用嵌套的PTV且不涉及患者模型表面,后者与临床靶区(CTV)相似。使用CTV平均剂量报告剂量处方往往会高估SIB计划较低剂量平台的平台剂量。PTVx提供了利用该体积内剂量的标准差来接近生物学效应的可能性。
作者主张报告PTV中位剂量,或者更优选地报告中心剂量平台PTVx的平均剂量,作为ICRU参考剂量的潜在替代或后继者——两者均可用于CRT和IMRT。