Division of Cardiology, Ospedale Civile, Cento, Ferrara, Italy.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2010 Mar;11(3):145-50. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328332e84a.
In recent years, considerable effort has been devoted to improving patient selection and the programming of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Mechanical dyssynchrony has been investigated through echocardiography and the reliability of ECG in selecting patients has been criticized and doubt has been cast on its role. Up to now, patient selection for CRT has relied upon the criteria of a prolonged QRS, evidence of the electrical impairment of the conduction system. Can we get more information from ECG morphology? Can it provide any marker for selecting candidates to CRT? Can we obtain useful information from the paced ECG morphology by analysis of fusion beats? Can we use ECG to optimize biventricular or single-site left ventricular pacing programming? The present review provides a critical analysis of the criteria for patient selection and the methods for optimal device setting, all based on 12-lead ECG morphology.
近年来,人们在努力改进心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的患者选择和程控。通过超声心动图研究了机械不同步,同时质疑和怀疑心电图在选择患者中的可靠性。到目前为止,CRT 的患者选择依赖于 QRS 延长的标准,以及传导系统电功能障碍的证据。我们能否从心电图形态中获得更多信息?它是否可以为 CRT 患者的选择提供任何标志物?我们能否通过分析融合波从起搏心电图形态中获得有用的信息?我们能否使用心电图来优化双心室或单部位左心室起搏程控?本综述基于 12 导联心电图形态,对患者选择标准和最佳设备设置方法进行了批判性分析。