• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

终极医生责任:无知的神话还是控制的神话?

Ultimate doctor liability: a myth of ignorance or myth of control?

作者信息

Cashin Andrew, Carey Michael, Watson Ngaire, Clark Greg, Newman Claire, Waters Cheryl D

机构信息

Southern Cross University School of Health and Human Sciences, Australia

出版信息

Collegian. 2009;16(3):125-9. doi: 10.1016/j.colegn.2009.06.003.

DOI:10.1016/j.colegn.2009.06.003
PMID:19831145
Abstract

Ultimate medical doctor responsibility for the care delivered to patients by all professionals is a myth. Legally Lord Denning dismissed the myth in the mid-20th century in England. The assumption that a medical doctor is responsible for the care delivered by nurses has not existed in English and Australian law since that time, and it has been actively refuted. Yet it is a myth that continues to circulate influencing health service, state and federal health policy. For some it is a myth of ignorance and for others it is a means of control. This paper outlines the relevant case law to debunk the myth of ultimate medical doctor control.

摘要

认为由所有专业人员提供给患者的护理最终都由医生负责,这是个神话。在20世纪中叶的英国,丹宁勋爵从法律层面驳斥了这一谬论。自那时起,认为医生要对护士提供的护理负责这一假设在英国和澳大利亚法律中就不存在了,并且这一假设已被有力地反驳。然而,这个神话仍在流传,影响着医疗服务、州和联邦的卫生政策。对一些人来说,这是一个无知的神话,而对另一些人来说,这是一种控制手段。本文概述了相关判例法,以揭穿医生最终控制权的神话。

相似文献

1
Ultimate doctor liability: a myth of ignorance or myth of control?终极医生责任:无知的神话还是控制的神话?
Collegian. 2009;16(3):125-9. doi: 10.1016/j.colegn.2009.06.003.
2
1.8 million dollar verdict: court orders JNOV for nurse practioner.
Nurs Law Regan Rep. 2006 Nov;47(6):1.
3
AR: tubal ligation fails--pregnancy results: nurse practictioner missed 'tubal' pregnancy. Summerville v. Thrower, No. 06-501 (Ark. 03/15/2007) S.W.3d. -AR.
Nurs Law Regan Rep. 2007 Jun;48(1):3.
4
Advanced practice nurses: a new skirmish in the continuing battle over scope of practice.高级执业护士:执业范围持续争论中的一场新冲突。
Clin Nurse Spec. 2007 Jan-Feb;21(1):52-4. doi: 10.1097/00002800-200701000-00011.
5
The first element of negligence.过失的首要因素。
Crit Care Nurse. 2003 Dec;23(6):81.
6
NY: Hospital not liable for physician's error: nurses not liable for physician's error either.纽约:医院对医生的失误不承担责任,护士对医生的失误也不承担责任。
Nurs Law Regan Rep. 2008 Jun;49(1):3.
7
Issues in medical aesthetics.
Adv Nurse Pract. 2006 Mar;14(3):26.
8
The Health Care Complaints Commission and nurses.医疗保健投诉委员会与护士。
Lamp. 1998 Mar;55(2):30-1.
9
Professional highlights of 2004. A focus on general health care concerns.
Adv Nurse Pract. 2004 Dec;12(12):47-8.
10
The role of the expert witness.专家证人的角色。
Surg Clin North Am. 2007 Aug;87(4):889-901, vii-viii. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2007.07.010.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiences of nurse practitioners and medical practitioners working in collaborative practice models in primary healthcare in Australia - a multiple case study using mixed methods.澳大利亚初级医疗保健中从事协作实践模式的执业护士和执业医生的经验——一项采用混合方法的多案例研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Jul 29;17:99. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0503-2.