Wright Jonathan L, Salinas Claudia A, Lin Daniel W, Kolb Suzanne, Koopmeiners Joseph, Feng Ziding, Stanford Janet L
Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
J Urol. 2009 Dec;182(6):2702-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.026.
Reports of biochemical recurrence after prostate cancer primary therapy show differences between Gleason 4 + 3 and 3 + 4 tumors. To our knowledge these findings have not been explored for prostate cancer specific mortality. In this population based cohort we determined prostate cancer outcomes at different Gleason scores, particularly the different Gleason 7 patterns.
Men 40 to 64 years old who were diagnosed with prostate cancer between 1993 and 1996 in King County, Washington comprised the cohort. Recurrence/progression was determined by followup survey and medical record review. Mortality and cause of death were obtained from the Seattle-Puget Sound Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry. HRs for outcomes were determined by Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.
In 753 men with prostate cancer 65 prostate cancer specific deaths occurred during a median followup of 13.2 years. The 10-year prostate cancer specific survival rate for Gleason 6 or less, 3 + 4, 4 + 3 and 8-10 disease was 98.4%, 92.1%, 76.5% and 69.9%, respectively. Compared to patients with Gleason 3 + 4 disease those with Gleason 4 + 3 tumors were at increased risk for prostate cancer specific mortality in the unadjusted and multivariate models (HR 2.80, 95% CI 1.26-6.18 and HR 2.12, 95% CI 0.87-5.17, respectively). In men undergoing curative therapy with radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy there was an increased risk of recurrence/progression (HR 2.10, 95% CI 1.08-4.08) and prostate cancer specific mortality (HR 3.17, 95% CI 1.04-9.67) in those with Gleason 4 + 3 vs 3 + 4 tumors in the multivariate models. No difference in prostate cancer specific mortality was seen between Gleason 4 + 3 and 8-10 tumors.
Gleason 7 prostate cancer shows heterogeneous behavior with Gleason 3 + 4 and 4 + 3 tumors conferring different prostate cancer specific mortality. These data provide important information for counseling patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer on the natural history of the disease and may inform treatment decisions.
前列腺癌初始治疗后生化复发的报告显示,Gleason 4 + 3和3 + 4肿瘤之间存在差异。据我们所知,这些发现尚未针对前列腺癌特异性死亡率进行探讨。在这个基于人群的队列研究中,我们确定了不同Gleason评分下的前列腺癌转归情况,尤其是不同的Gleason 7模式。
该队列包括1993年至1996年在华盛顿州金县被诊断为前列腺癌的40至64岁男性。通过随访调查和病历审查确定复发/进展情况。死亡率和死亡原因来自西雅图 - 普吉特海湾监测、流行病学和最终结果登记处。通过Cox比例风险回归分析确定转归的风险比(HR)。
在753例前列腺癌男性患者中,中位随访13.2年期间发生了65例前列腺癌特异性死亡。Gleason 6及以下、3 + 4、4 + 3和8 - 10疾病的10年前列腺癌特异性生存率分别为98.4%、92.1%、76.5%和69.9%。与Gleason 3 + 4疾病患者相比,Gleason 4 + 3肿瘤患者在未调整和多变量模型中前列腺癌特异性死亡风险增加(HR分别为2.80,95%CI 1.26 - 6.18和HR 2.12,95%CI 0.87 - 5.17)。在接受根治性前列腺切除术或放射治疗的男性中,多变量模型显示Gleason 4 + 3肿瘤患者与3 + 4肿瘤患者相比,复发/进展风险增加(HR 2.10,95%CI 1.08 - 4.08),前列腺癌特异性死亡风险增加(HR 3.17,95%CI 1.04 - 9.67)。Gleason 4 + 3和8 - 10肿瘤之间在前列腺癌特异性死亡率方面未见差异。
Gleason 7前列腺癌表现出异质性,Gleason 3 + 4和4 + 3肿瘤具有不同的前列腺癌特异性死亡率。这些数据为向Gleason 7前列腺癌患者咨询疾病自然史提供了重要信息,并可能为治疗决策提供参考。