Rak Vaclav, Ira Daniel, Masek Michal
Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic.
Indian J Orthop. 2009 Jul;43(3):271-80. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.49388.
In a retrospective study we analysed intra-articular calcaneal fracture treatment by comparing results and complications related to fracture stabilization with nonlocking calcaneal plates and locking compression plates.
We performed 76 osteosynthesis (67 patients) of intra-articular calcaneal fractures using the standard extended lateral approach from February 2004 to October 2007. Forty-two operations using nonlocking calcaneal plates (group A) were performed during the first three years, and 34 calcaneal fractures were stabilized using locking compression plates (group B) in 2007. In the Sanders type IV fractures, reconstruction of the calcaneal shape was attempted. Depending on the type of late complication, we performed subtalar arthroscopy in six cases, arthroscopically assisted subtalar distraction bone block arthrodesis in six cases, and plate removal with lateral-wall decompression in five cases. The patients were evaluated by the AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale.
Wound healing complications were 7/42 (17%) in group A and 1/34 (3%) in group B. No patient had deep osseous infection or foot rebound compartment syndrome. Preoperative size of Böhler's angle correlated with postoperative clinical results in both groups. There were no late complications necessitating corrective procedure or arthroscopy until December 2008 in Group B. All late complications ccurred in Group A. The overall results according to the AOFAS Ankle Hindfoot Scale were good or excellent in 23/42 (55%) in group A and in 30/34 (85%) in group B.
Open reduction and internal fixation of intra-articular calcaneal fractures has become a standard surgical method. Fewer complications and better results related to treatment with locking compression plates confirmed in comparison to nonlocking ones were noted for all Sanders types of intra-articular calcaneal fractures. Age and Sanders type IV fractures are not considered to be the contraindications to surgery.
在一项回顾性研究中,我们通过比较使用非锁定跟骨钢板和锁定加压钢板进行骨折固定的结果及并发症,分析关节内跟骨骨折的治疗情况。
2004年2月至2007年10月,我们采用标准的外侧延长入路对76例关节内跟骨骨折进行了骨固定术(67例患者)。前三年使用非锁定跟骨钢板进行了42例手术(A组),2007年使用锁定加压钢板对34例跟骨骨折进行了固定(B组)。对于Sanders IV型骨折,尝试进行跟骨外形重建。根据晚期并发症的类型,我们对6例患者进行了距下关节镜检查,6例患者进行了关节镜辅助下距下撑开植骨融合术,5例患者进行了钢板取出并外侧壁减压术。采用美国足踝外科协会(AOFAS)踝-后足评分量表对患者进行评估。
A组伤口愈合并发症为7/42(17%),B组为1/34(3%)。没有患者发生深部骨感染或足部减压室综合征。两组患者术前的Böhler角大小与术后临床结果相关。直到2008年12月,B组没有出现需要进行矫正手术或关节镜检查的晚期并发症。所有晚期并发症均发生在A组。根据AOFAS踝-后足评分量表,A组23/42(55%)的总体结果为良好或优秀,B组为30/34(85%)。
关节内跟骨骨折的切开复位内固定已成为一种标准的手术方法。对于所有Sanders型关节内跟骨骨折,与非锁定钢板相比,锁定加压钢板治疗的并发症更少,效果更好。年龄和Sanders IV型骨折不被认为是手术禁忌证。