Department of Orthopedics, Baoan Central Hospital of Shenzhen, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, No. 233 Xixiang Section of Guang Shen Road, Xixiang Street, Baoan District, Shenzhen, 518102, Guangdong, China.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Aug;47(4):1211-1219. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01221-2. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
Some previous studies have demonstrated that the sinus tarsi approach (STA) is a better therapeutic method than the extensile lateral approach (ELA) for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. In a number of those previous studies, two different implants were used in the two approaches respectively. There is a question: if using the same implants, is STA still a better method than ELA? To answer this question, this retrospective study was designed.
Between December 2009 and December 2018, 384 patients with displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures were treated by ELA or STA with the same locking compression plates fixation. Data on demographics, wound complications, Bohler's angle, crucial angle of Gissane, walking visual analogue scale (walking-VAS) and American Orthopedics Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale were recorded and analyzed.
230 patients were treated by ELA, while 154 patients were treated by STA. Radiological and clinical results were evaluated. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to wounds complications, Bohler's angle, crucial angle of Gissane, walking-VAS and AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scale.
Under the condition of using the same locking compression plates, there were no significant differences between ELA and STA for the treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures with regard to wound complications, radiological and clinical outcomes.
一些先前的研究表明,跗骨窦入路(STA)对于关节内移位的跟骨骨折是一种比广泛外侧入路(ELA)更好的治疗方法。在之前的一些研究中,两种不同的植入物分别用于两种方法。有一个问题:如果使用相同的植入物,STA 是否仍然是一种比 ELA 更好的方法?为了回答这个问题,进行了这项回顾性研究。
2009 年 12 月至 2018 年 12 月,384 例关节内移位的跟骨骨折患者分别采用 ELA 或 STA 联合锁定加压钢板固定治疗。记录并分析了人口统计学资料、伤口并发症、Bohler 角、Gissane 关键角、步行视觉模拟量表(walking-VAS)和美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)踝关节-后足评分。
230 例患者采用 ELA 治疗,154 例患者采用 STA 治疗。对影像学和临床结果进行了评估。两组在伤口并发症、Bohler 角、Gissane 关键角、walking-VAS 和 AOFAS 踝关节-后足评分方面均无显著差异。
在使用相同锁定加压钢板的情况下,ELA 和 STA 治疗关节内移位的跟骨骨折在伤口并发症、影像学和临床结果方面没有显著差异。