Suppr超能文献

SCHIP 对小团体健康保险市场中依赖型保险的影响。

SCHIP's impact on dependent coverage in the small-group health insurance market.

机构信息

Division of Health Services Management and Policy, Ohio State University-College of Public Health, 5052 Smith Laboratory, 174 W 18th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2010 Feb;45(1):230-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01052.x. Epub 2009 Oct 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the impact of State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) expansions on public and private coverage of dependents at small firms compared with large firms.

DATA SOURCES

1996-2007 Annual Demographic Survey of the Current Population Survey (CPS).

STUDY DESIGN

This study estimates a two-stage least squares (2SLS) model for four insurance outcomes that instruments for SCHIP and Medicaid eligibility. Separate models are estimated for small group markets (firms with fewer than 25 employees), small businesses (firms under 500 employees), and large firms (firms 500 employees and above).

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We extracted data from the 1996-2007 CPS for children in households with at least one worker.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The SCHIP expansions decreased the percentage of uninsured dependents in the small group market by 7.6 percentage points with negligible crowd-out in the small group and no significant effect on private coverage across the 11-year-period.

CONCLUSIONS

The SCHIP expansions have increased coverage for households in the small group market with no significant crowd-out of private coverage. In contrast, the estimates for large firms are consistent with the substantial crowd-out observed in the literature.

摘要

目的

估计《儿童健康保险计划》(SCHIP)扩面对小企业与大企业相比,对未成年受抚养人公共和私人保险覆盖的影响。

数据来源

1996-2007 年《当前人口调查年度人口抽样调查》(CPS)。

研究设计

本研究对四个保险结果进行了两阶段最小二乘法(2SLS)模型估计,为 SCHIP 和医疗补助资格提供了工具变量。为小团体市场(员工少于 25 人的企业)、小企业(员工少于 500 人的企业)和大企业(员工 500 人及以上的企业)分别建立了单独的模型。

数据收集/提取方法:我们从 1996-2007 年 CPS 中提取了至少有一名工人的家庭中儿童的数据。

主要发现

在 11 年期间,SCHIP 扩面使小团体市场中未参保受抚养人的比例降低了 7.6 个百分点,小团体市场的挤出效应可忽略不计,对私人保险覆盖范围没有显著影响。

结论

SCHIP 扩面增加了小团体市场家庭的覆盖范围,对私人保险覆盖范围没有显著的挤出效应。相比之下,大企业的估计结果与文献中观察到的大量挤出效应一致。

引用本文的文献

1
Which states enroll their Medicaid-eligible, citizen children with immigrant parents?
Health Serv Res. 2013 Apr;48(2 Pt 1):519-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01467.x. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
2
Public-private substitution among Medicaid adults: evidence from Ohio.
Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2011 Mar 31;1(1):001.01.a01. doi: 10.5600/mmrr.001.01.a01.

本文引用的文献

1
Crowd-out 10 years later: have recent public insurance expansions crowded out private health insurance?
J Health Econ. 2008 Mar;27(2):201-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.11.004. Epub 2007 Nov 29.
3
Why millions of children eligible for Medicaid and SCHIP are uninsured: poor retention versus poor take-up.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Sep-Oct;26(5):w560-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.w560. Epub 2007 Jul 26.
4
The impact of SCHIP on insurance coverage of children.
Inquiry. 2005 Fall;42(3):232-54. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_42.3.232.
5
The effect of the State Children's Health Insurance Program on health insurance coverage.
J Health Econ. 2004 Sep;23(5):1059-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.03.006.
7
Did Medicaid expansions for pregnant women crowd out private coverage?
Health Aff (Millwood). 1997 Jan-Feb;16(1):185-93. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.16.1.185.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验