Cariology and Operative Dentistry, Department of Restorative Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
J Adhes Dent. 2009 Oct;11(5):347-53.
To evaluate the dentin bonding durability of two one-step self-etching adhesive systems with and without the presence of surrounding enamel.
Tri-S Bond (Kuraray) and G-Bond (GC), commercially available adhesive systems, were used in this study. The occlusal enamel was removed in order to form a flat, midcoronal dentin surface. The adhesives were applied to both the dentin and the surrounding enamel surfaces according to the manufacturers' instructions. Resin composite crowns (Clearfil AP-X, Kuraray) were incrementally built up with each layer being photocured for 40 s. Half the bonded teeth were sectioned perpendicular to the adhesive interface into 0.7-mm-thick slabs, and then trimmed to an hourglass shape with a 1 mm2 cross-sectional area for microtensile bond strength testing, followed by storage in water for 6 months (direct water exposure group, DE). The other half were left untrimmed and stored in water for 6 months (indirect water exposure group, IE). As control groups, additional bonded teeth were prepared for water storage for 24 h. After the designated periods of water storage, the specimens were subjected to bond strength testing at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min. The microTBS data were statistically analyzed using three-way ANOVA and post-hoc tests (t-test and Tukey's HSD comparison tests) (alpha = 0.05).
Indirect water exposure of the resin/dentin interface did not affect the microTBS of either adhesive after 6 months water storage (p < 0.05). However, direct exposure to water significantly reduced the microTBS of both adhesives to dentin (p < 0.05). In addition, there were no significant differences in muTBS between the two adhesive systems for each experimental storage condition (p > 0.05).
The durability of resin-dentin bonds was found to be dependent on the method in which the bonded specimens were aged in water. Significantly lower bond strengths were observed for specimens that were sectioned into an hourglass shape before aging compared to those that were sectioned after water storage.
评估两种一步自酸蚀粘接剂系统在有无周围釉质存在的情况下的牙本质粘接耐久性。
本研究使用了市售的 Tri-S Bond(可乐丽)和 G-Bond(GC)两种粘接剂系统。为了形成一个平的、中牙本质表面,去除了咬合面釉质。根据制造商的说明,将粘接剂分别应用于牙本质和周围釉质表面。用 Clearfil AP-X(可乐丽)树脂复合材料冠层逐层堆积,每层用 40 s 的光固化。将一半粘结的牙齿垂直于粘结界面切成 0.7-mm 厚的薄片,然后修剪成沙漏形状,截面积为 1mm2,用于微拉伸粘结强度测试,然后在水中储存 6 个月(直接水暴露组,DE)。另一半未修剪,在水中储存 6 个月(间接水暴露组,IE)。作为对照组,另外一些粘结的牙齿也准备好用于水储存 24 h。在指定的水储存期后,将试件在 1.0 mm/min 的十字头速度下进行粘结强度测试。使用三因素方差分析和事后检验(t 检验和 Tukey 的 HSD 比较检验)(alpha = 0.05)对微 TBS 数据进行统计分析。
间接水暴露于树脂/牙本质界面在 6 个月水储存后对两种粘接剂的微 TBS 没有影响(p < 0.05)。然而,直接暴露于水显著降低了两种粘接剂对牙本质的微 TBS(p < 0.05)。此外,在每种实验储存条件下,两种粘接剂的 muTBS 之间没有显著差异(p > 0.05)。
树脂-牙本质粘结的耐久性发现取决于将粘结试件在水中老化的方法。在老化前切成沙漏形状的试件与在水储存后切成沙漏形状的试件相比,粘结强度显著降低。