Kromer Thilo O, Tautenhahn Ulrike G, de Bie Rob A, Staal J Bart, Bastiaenen Caroline H G
Physiotherapiezentrum, Grube 21, DE-82377 Penzberg, The Netherlands.
J Rehabil Med. 2009 Nov;41(11):870-80. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0453.
To critically summarize the effectiveness of physio-therapy in patients presenting clinical signs of shoulder impingement syndrome.
Systematic review.
Randomized controlled trials were searched electronically and manually from 1966 to December 2007. Study quality was independently assessed by 2 reviewers using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. If possible, relative risks and weighted mean differences were calculated for individual studies, and relative risks or standardized mean differences for pooled data, otherwise results were summarized in a best evidence synthesis.
Sixteen studies were included, with a mean quality score of 6.8 points out of 10. Many different diagnostic criteria for shoulder impingement syndrome were applied. Physio-therapist-led exercises and surgery were equally effective treatments for shoulder impingement syndrome in the long term. Also, home-based exercises were as effective as combined physiotherapy interventions. Adding manual therapy to exercise programmes may have an additional benefit on pain at 3 weeks follow-up. Moderate evidence exists that passive treatments are not effective and cannot be justified.
This review shows an equal effectiveness of physiotherapist-led exercises compared with surgery in the long term and of home-based exercises compared with combined physiotherapy interventions in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome in the short and long term; passive treatments cannot be recommended for shoulder impingement syndrome. However, in general, the samples were small, and different diagnostic criteria were applied, which makes a firm conclusion difficult. More high-quality trials with longer follow-ups are recommended.
批判性地总结物理治疗对出现肩部撞击综合征临床症状患者的疗效。
系统评价。
通过电子检索和手工检索1966年至2007年12月期间的随机对照试验。由两名评价者使用物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)量表独立评估研究质量。如有可能,计算各研究的相对风险和加权均数差,以及汇总数据的相对风险或标准化均数差,否则将结果汇总为最佳证据综合分析。
纳入16项研究,平均质量评分为6.8分(满分10分)。应用了许多不同的肩部撞击综合征诊断标准。从长期来看,由物理治疗师指导的锻炼和手术对肩部撞击综合征同样有效。此外,家庭锻炼与综合物理治疗干预同样有效。在锻炼计划中增加手法治疗在随访3周时可能对疼痛有额外益处。有中等证据表明被动治疗无效且不合理。
本评价显示,从长期来看,由物理治疗师指导的锻炼与手术效果相当,从短期和长期来看,家庭锻炼与综合物理治疗干预效果相当;不推荐对肩部撞击综合征进行被动治疗。然而,总体而言,样本量较小,且应用了不同的诊断标准,这使得难以得出确凿结论。建议进行更多高质量、随访时间更长的试验。