Cowper Gavin, Goodall Stuart, Hicks Kirsty, Burnie Louise, Briggs Marc
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2022 Aug 13;14(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s13102-022-00546-7.
Prior to exercise, a warm-up routine has been suggested to be an imperative factor in task readiness with the anticipation that it will enhance performance. One of the key benefits of a warm-up is the increase in muscle and core temperature, which can be achieved in a variety of ways. An effective way to achieve improvements in core and muscle temperature is by performing an active warm-up. However, lengthy transition periods between an active warm-up and exercise performance are known to cause a decline in core and muscle temperature, thereby reducing performance capability. As such, methods are needed to assist athletes during transition periods, to maintain the benefits of a warm-up with the aim of optimising performance. Accordingly, the purpose of this review is to systematically analyse the evidence base that has investigated the use of passive heating to aide sporting performance when a transition period is experienced.
A systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken following relevant studies being identified using PubMed, Web of Science, and EBSCO. Studies investigating the effects of passive heating strategies during the transition period between an active warm-up and exercise performance were included. The quality of the included studies were assessed by two independent reviewers using a modified version of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale.
Seven studies, all high quality (mean = 7.6), reported sufficient data (quality score > 5) on the effects of passive heating strategies on exercise performance, these studies consisted of 85 well-trained athletes (78 male and 7 female). Passive heating strategies used between an active warm-up and exercise, significantly increased peak power output in all studies (ES = 0.54 [95% CI 0.17 to 0.91]). However, only a favourable trend was evident for exercise performance (ES = 1.07 [95% CI - 0.64 to 0.09]).
Based upon a limited number of well-conducted, randomised, controlled trials, it appears that passive heating strategies used between an active warm-up and exercise have a positive impact on peak power output. Although, additional research is necessary to determine the optimum procedure for passive warm-up strategies.
在运动前,建议进行热身程序,这是任务准备状态的一个重要因素,预期它会提高运动表现。热身的一个关键益处是肌肉和核心温度的升高,这可以通过多种方式实现。实现核心和肌肉温度改善的一种有效方法是进行主动热身。然而,已知在主动热身和运动表现之间的冗长过渡期会导致核心和肌肉温度下降,从而降低运动能力。因此,需要一些方法来在过渡期帮助运动员,以维持热身的益处,从而优化运动表现。相应地,本综述的目的是系统分析已调查在经历过渡期时使用被动加热辅助运动表现的证据基础。
在使用PubMed、科学网和EBSCO识别相关研究后,进行了系统综述和荟萃分析。纳入了研究主动热身和运动表现之间过渡期被动加热策略效果的研究。两名独立评审员使用改良版的物理治疗证据数据库量表评估纳入研究的质量。
七项研究,均为高质量(平均 = 7.6),报告了关于被动加热策略对运动表现影响的充分数据(质量得分 > 5),这些研究包括85名训练有素的运动员(78名男性和7名女性)。在主动热身和运动之间使用的被动加热策略,在所有研究中均显著提高了峰值功率输出(效应量 = 0.54 [95%置信区间 0.17至0.91])。然而,运动表现仅呈现出有利趋势(效应量 = 1.07 [95%置信区间 -0.64至0.09])。
基于有限数量的精心进行的随机对照试验,似乎在主动热身和运动之间使用的被动加热策略对峰值功率输出有积极影响。尽管如此,还需要更多研究来确定被动热身策略的最佳程序。