• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗高危重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者:系统评价。

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: A systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The University of Sydney, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney 2050, Australia.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Jun;139(6):1519-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.08.037. Epub 2009 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.08.037
PMID:19846124
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The present systematic review objectively assessed the safety and clinical effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation for patients at high surgical risk with severe aortic stenosis.

METHODS

Electronic searches were performed in 6 databases from January 2000 to March 2009. The end points included feasibility, safety, efficacy, and durability. Clinical effectiveness was synthesized through a narrative review with full tabulation of results of all included studies.

RESULTS

The current evidence on transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis is limited to short-term observational studies. The overall procedural success rates ranged from 74% to 100%. The incidence of major adverse events included 30-day mortality (0%-25%), major ventricular tachyarrhythmia (0%-4%), myocardial infarction (0%-15%), cardiac tamponade (2%-10%), stroke (0%-10%), conversion to surgery (0%-8%), moderate to major paravalvular leak (4%-35%), vascular complication (8%-17%), valve-in-valve procedure (2%-12%), and aortic dissection/perforation (0%-4%). The overall 30-day major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events ranged from 3% to 35%. The mean aortic valve area ranged from 0.5 to 0.8 cm(2) before and 1.3 to 2.0 cm(2) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The mean pressure gradient ranged from 34 to 58 mm Hg before and 3 to 12 mm Hg after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. There was no significant deterioration in echocardiography measurements during the assessment period. Death rate at 6 months postprocedure ranged from 18% to 48%. No studies had adequate follow-up to reliably evaluate long-term outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The procedure has a potential for serious complications. Although short-term efficacy based on echocardiography measurements is good, there is little evidence on long-term outcomes. The use of transcatheter aortic valve implantation should be considered only within the boundaries of clinical trials.

摘要

目的

本系统评价客观评估了经导管主动脉瓣植入术在高危外科手术严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者中的安全性和临床疗效。

方法

电子检索 2000 年 1 月至 2009 年 3 月的 6 个数据库。终点包括可行性、安全性、疗效和耐久性。通过叙述性综述综合临床疗效,并详细列出所有纳入研究的结果。

结果

目前关于经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄的证据仅限于短期观察性研究。总体手术成功率为 74%至 100%。主要不良事件的发生率包括 30 天死亡率(0%-25%)、严重室性心律失常(0%-4%)、心肌梗死(0%-15%)、心脏压塞(2%-10%)、中风(0%-10%)、转为手术(0%-8%)、中重度瓣周漏(4%-35%)、血管并发症(8%-17%)、瓣中瓣手术(2%-12%)和主动脉夹层/穿孔(0%-4%)。30 天主要不良心血管和脑事件的总发生率为 3%至 35%。经导管主动脉瓣植入术前平均主动脉瓣面积为 0.5 至 0.8cm²,术后为 1.3 至 2.0cm²。经导管主动脉瓣植入术前平均压力梯度为 34 至 58mmHg,术后为 3 至 12mmHg。评估期间超声心动图测量值无明显恶化。术后 6 个月死亡率为 18%至 48%。没有研究有足够的随访来可靠地评估长期结果。

结论

该手术有发生严重并发症的潜在风险。虽然基于超声心动图测量的短期疗效良好,但长期结果的证据很少。经导管主动脉瓣植入术的应用应仅在临床试验范围内考虑。

相似文献

1
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: A systematic review.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗高危重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者:系统评价。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Jun;139(6):1519-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.08.037. Epub 2009 Oct 28.
2
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术的有限胸骨切开术与全胸骨切开术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 10;4(4):CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub2.
3
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis in high surgical risk patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗高危外科手术风险主动脉瓣狭窄患者:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 May 10;13(5):e0196877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196877. eCollection 2018.
4
Meta-analysis of longitudinal comparison of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low to intermediate surgical risk.低至中度手术风险患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术纵向比较的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 Dec 1;110(12):8097-8106. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002158.
5
Safety of percutaneous aortic valve insertion. A systematic review.经皮主动脉瓣植入术的安全性。一项系统评价。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2009 Sep 1;9:45. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-9-45.
6
Impact of previous cardiac surgery in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review.既往心脏手术对接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者的影响:一项系统评价。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2017 Oct;58(5):787-793. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.17.09636-7. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
8
5-Year Echocardiographic Results of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients.低风险患者经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术的5年超声心动图结果
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Jun;18(6):625-640. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2025.01.015. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
9
Valve in valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV-TAVI) versus redo-Surgical aortic valve replacement (redo-SAVR): A systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置入术(ViV-TAVI)中的瓣中瓣技术与再次外科主动脉瓣置换术(redo-SAVR):一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Oct;31(5):661-671. doi: 10.1111/joic.12520. Epub 2018 May 20.
10
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With or Without Percutaneous Coronary Artery Revascularization Strategy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术联合或不联合经皮冠状动脉血运重建策略:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jun 27;6(6):e005960. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005960.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors associated with acute kidney injury in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Short-term outcomes and impact of right heart failure.经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者急性肾损伤的相关因素:短期结局及右心衰竭的影响
North Clin Istanb. 2024 Apr 24;11(2):133-139. doi: 10.14744/nci.2024.87864. eCollection 2024.
2
Free-aldehyde neutralized and oligohyaluronan loaded bovine pericardium with improved anti-calcification and endothelialization for bioprosthetic heart valves.用于生物人工心脏瓣膜的具有改善的抗钙化和内皮化性能的游离醛中和且负载低聚透明质酸的牛心包。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Apr 3;11:1138972. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1138972. eCollection 2023.
3
Outcomes of Aortic Valve Replacement Via Right Anterior Minithoracotomy and Central Cannulation Versus Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement in Obese Patients.
经右前小开胸和中心插管与传统主动脉瓣置换术治疗肥胖患者的主动脉瓣置换术的结果。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Dec 1;37(6):875-882. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0098.
4
The impact of frailty in aortic valve surgery.主动脉瓣手术中脆弱的影响。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Oct 27;20(1):426. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01716-3.
5
Thrombocytopenia in Moderate- to High-Risk Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement.中高危无缝合主动脉瓣置换术中的血小板减少症
Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Jun;51(3):172-179. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2018.51.3.172. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
6
Initial Experience with Aortic Valve Replacement via a Minimally Invasive Approach: A Comparison of Stented, Stentless and Sutureless Valves.经微创途径进行主动脉瓣置换的初步经验:带支架瓣膜、无支架瓣膜和无缝合瓣膜的比较
Med Sci Monit. 2017 Apr 5;23:1645-1654. doi: 10.12659/msm.901780.
7
Computer Vision Techniques for Transcatheter Intervention.计算机视觉技术在经导管介入治疗中的应用。
IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2015 Jun 18;3:1900331. doi: 10.1109/JTEHM.2015.2446988. eCollection 2015.
8
Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised trials.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较:随机和非随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Open Heart. 2014 Aug 12;1(1):e000013. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2013-000013. eCollection 2014.
9
Long-term results after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: what do we know today?经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的长期结果:我们如今了解到了什么?
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2013 Nov;9(4):295-8. doi: 10.2174/1573403x09666131202124227.
10
Aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: mechanisms and implications.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后主动脉瓣反流:机制与意义。
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2013 Mar;3(1):15-22. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2013.02.01.