Baskaran Mani, Kumar Rajesh S, Govindasamy Chitra V, Htoon Hla Myint, Wong Ching-Yee, Perera Shamira A, Wong Tina T L, Aung Tin
Singapore National Eye Center and Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
Ophthalmology. 2009 Dec;116(12):2300-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.06.010. Epub 2009 Oct 22.
To investigate diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuation in eyes with angle closure in comparison with normal subjects and to look for associated risk factors for IOP fluctuation.
Prospective, cross-sectional study.
Ninety-eight eyes of 98 Asian subjects with angle closure (consisting of 32 primary angle-closure suspects [PACS], 34 subjects with primary angle closure [PAC], and 32 subjects with primary angle-closure glaucoma [PACG]) and 21 eyes of 21 normal control subjects.
All angle-closure subjects were enrolled after laser peripheral iridotomy but before commencement of any medical or surgical treatment. Ophthalmic examination, including dynamic gonioscopy and automated perimetry, were performed, and diurnal IOP measurements were obtained using noncontact air-puff tonometry at hourly intervals between 8:00 am and 5:00 pm. Mean diurnal IOP, peak diurnal IOP, trough IOP, and IOP fluctuation (peak IOP-trough IOP) were compared between groups. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to study the association of IOP fluctuation with clinical variables such as age, extent of peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS), central corneal thickness, vertical cup-to-disc ratio, and pattern standard deviation (PSD) on automated perimetry.
Mean diurnal IOP, peak IOP, and IOP fluctuation.
Most subjects were Chinese (89.1%) and female (61.3%). Intraocular pressure fluctuation was significantly higher in PACG (5.4+/-2.4 mmHg) and PAC (4.5+/-2.3 mmHg) subjects compared with PACS subjects (3.7+/-1.2 mmHg) and normal controls (3.8+/-1.1 mmHg; P = 0.005), with highest IOP found in the early morning. The combined PACG and PAC group had more than twice the risk (odds ratio, 2.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-5.1; P = 0.025) of having IOP fluctuation of more than 3 mmHg compared with the combined PACS and normal group. Extent of PAS (Pearson's correlation coefficient, r = 0.37; P = 0.0001) and visual field PSD (r = 0.34; P = 0.0002) were found to be associated with greater IOP fluctuation.
The PACG and PAC eyes showed diurnal IOP fluctuation of 4 to 5 mmHg, and this fluctuation was higher than in PACS subjects and normal controls. The degree of PAS and visual field loss were associated with IOP fluctuation in PAC and PACG eyes.
比较闭角型青光眼患者与正常受试者的昼夜眼压波动情况,并寻找眼压波动的相关危险因素。
前瞻性横断面研究。
98例亚洲闭角型青光眼患者的98只眼(包括32例原发性闭角型青光眼可疑患者[PACS]、34例原发性闭角型青光眼患者[PAC]和32例原发性闭角型青光眼患者[PACG])以及21例正常对照者的21只眼。
所有闭角型青光眼患者均在激光周边虹膜切开术后、开始任何药物或手术治疗前纳入研究。进行眼科检查,包括动态前房角镜检查和自动视野检查,并于上午8:00至下午5:00每隔1小时使用非接触式眼压计测量昼夜眼压。比较各组的平均昼夜眼压、昼夜眼压峰值、眼压谷值和眼压波动(眼压峰值 - 眼压谷值)。进行多元线性回归分析,以研究眼压波动与年龄、周边前粘连(PAS)范围、中央角膜厚度、垂直杯盘比和自动视野检查中的模式标准差(PSD)等临床变量之间的关系。
平均昼夜眼压、眼压峰值和眼压波动。
大多数受试者为中国人(89.1%),女性占61.3%。与PACS受试者(3.7±1.2 mmHg)和正常对照组(3.8±1.1 mmHg;P = 0.005)相比,PACG患者(5.4±2.4 mmHg)和PAC患者(4.5±2.3 mmHg)的眼压波动明显更高,清晨眼压最高。与PACS组和正常组联合相比,PACG组和PAC组联合发生眼压波动超过3 mmHg的风险高出两倍多(优势比,2.38;95%置信区间,1.1 - 5.1;P = 0.025)。发现PAS范围(Pearson相关系数,r = 0.37;P = 0.0001)和视野PSD(r = 0.34;P = 0.0002)与更大的眼压波动相关。
PACG和PAC患者的昼夜眼压波动为4至5 mmHg,且这种波动高于PACS受试者和正常对照组。PAS程度和视野缺损程度与PAC和PACG患者的眼压波动相关。