Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas (CIECo), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Morelia, Michoacán, México.
Am J Primatol. 2010 Jan;72(1):1-16. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20753.
We examined the literature on the effects of habitat fragmentation and disturbance on howler monkeys (genus Alouatta) to (1) identify different threats that may affect howlers in fragmented landscapes; (2) review specific predictions developed in fragmentation theory and (3) identify the empirical evidence supporting these predictions. Although howlers are known for their ability to persist in both conserved and disturbed conditions, we found evidence that they are negatively affected by high levels of habitat loss, fragmentation and degradation. Patch size appears to be the main factor constraining populations in fragmented habitats, probably because patch size is positively related to food availability, and negatively related to anthropogenic pressures, physiological stress and parasite loads. Patch isolation is not a strong predictor of either patch occupancy or population size in howlers, a result that may be related to the ability of howlers to move among forest patches. Thus, we propose that it is probable that habitat loss has larger consistent negative effects on howler populations than habitat fragmentation per se. In general, food availability decreases with patch size, not only due to habitat loss, but also because the density of big trees, plant species richness and howlers' home range size are lower in smaller patches, where howlers' population densities are commonly higher. However, it is unclear which vegetation attributes have the biggest influence on howler populations. Similarly, our knowledge is still limited concerning the effects of postfragmentation threats (e.g. hunting and logging) on howlers living in forest patches, and how several endogenous threats (e.g. genetic diversity, physiological stress, and parasitism) affect the distribution, population structure and persistence of howlers. More long-term studies with comparable methods are necessary to quantify some of the patterns discussed in this review, and determine through meta-analyses whether there are significant inter-specific differences in species' responses to habitat loss and fragmentation.
我们查阅了有关栖息地破碎化和干扰对吼猴(属 Alouatta)影响的文献,以:(1) 确定可能影响破碎化景观中吼猴的不同威胁;(2) 综述破碎化理论中提出的具体预测;(3) 确定支持这些预测的实证证据。尽管吼猴以在保护和干扰条件下都能生存而闻名,但我们发现有证据表明,它们受到高水平的栖息地丧失、破碎化和退化的负面影响。斑块大小似乎是限制破碎化栖息地种群的主要因素,这可能是因为斑块大小与食物供应呈正相关,与人为压力、生理压力和寄生虫负荷呈负相关。在吼猴中,斑块隔离不是斑块占据或种群大小的有力预测因子,这一结果可能与吼猴在森林斑块之间移动的能力有关。因此,我们认为,与栖息地破碎化本身相比,栖息地丧失对吼猴种群的负面影响可能更大、更一致。一般来说,由于栖息地丧失,以及由于大树密度、植物物种丰富度和吼猴的家域面积在较小的斑块中较低,食物供应随斑块大小而减少,而在较小的斑块中吼猴的种群密度通常较高。然而,尚不清楚哪些植被属性对吼猴种群的影响最大。同样,我们对生活在森林斑块中的吼猴受到的后破碎化威胁(如狩猎和伐木)的影响以及几种内源性威胁(如遗传多样性、生理压力和寄生虫)如何影响吼猴的分布、种群结构和生存能力的了解仍然有限。需要更多具有可比性方法的长期研究来量化本综述中讨论的一些模式,并通过荟萃分析确定不同物种对栖息地丧失和破碎化的反应是否存在显著的种间差异。