Suppr超能文献

Canopy penetration and deposition of barrier sprays from electrostatic and conventional sprayers.

作者信息

Hoffmann W C, Farooq M, Walker T W, Fritz B, Szumlas D, Quinn B, Bernier U, Hogsette J, Lan Y, Huang Y, Smith V L, Robinson C A

机构信息

USDA-ARS-Areawide Pest Management Research Unit, College Station, TX 77845, USA.

出版信息

J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2009 Sep;25(3):323-31. doi: 10.2987/08-5780.1.

Abstract

An experimental study was conducted to investigate the usefulness of electrostatic and conventional sprayers for barrier applications. Two conventional and three electrostatic sprayers were used in the study. Usefulness of the sprayers was rated based on penetration of spray into and deposition onto 2 sides of leaves on natural vegetation. Bifenthrin (Talstar adulticide) was applied at labeled rate, fluorescent dye was added to the tank mix as tracer, and all sprayers applied the dye and insecticide at the same rate. The results indicated that sprayers producing larger droplets produced significantly higher deposition on vegetation in barrier applications than the sprayers producing smaller droplets. Sprayers with higher air velocity at the nozzle discharge proved significantly better for barrier sprays than the sprayers with lower air velocity. Electrostatic sprayers did not show any improvement in deposition on vegetation or in penetration into vegetation over the conventional sprayers. There was no difference in deposition between truck-mounted and backpack sprayers.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验