Marcén Roberto
Department of Nephrology, Ramón y Cajal Hospital, Alcalá de Henares University, Madrid, Spain.
Drugs. 2009 Nov 12;69(16):2227-43. doi: 10.2165/11319260-000000000-00000.
Renal transplant recipients have increased mortality rates when compared with the general population. The new immunosuppressive drugs have improved short-term patient survival up to 95% at 1-2 years, but these data have to be confirmed in long-term follow-up. Furthermore, no particular regimen has proved to be superior over others with regard to patient survival. Cardiovascular diseases are the most common cause of mortality in renal transplant recipients and while no immunosuppressive drug has been directly associated with cardiovascular events, immunosuppressive drugs have different impacts on traditional risk factors. Corticosteroids and ciclosporin are the agents with the most negative impact on weight gain, blood pressure and lipids. Tacrolimus increases the risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus. Sirolimus and everolimus have the most impact on risk factors for post-transplant hyperlipidaemia. Modifications in immunosuppression could improve the cardiovascular profile but there is little evidence regarding the beneficial effects of these changes on patient outcomes. Malignancies are also an increasing cause of mortality, overtaking cardiovascular disease in some series. Induction therapy, azathioprine and calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are probably the immunosuppressive agents most linked with post-transplant malignancies. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has no negative impact on the incidence of malignancies. Target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors have antioncogenic properties and they are associated with a lower incidence of malignancies. In addition, these agents have been recommended for use to decrease the dose or withdrawal of CNIs in patients with malignancies. Infections are still an important cause of morbidity and mortality in renal transplant recipients. Some immunosuppressive agents such as MMF increase the incidence of cytomegalovirus infection and the need for prophylactic measures in risk recipients. The use of potent immunosuppressive therapy has resulted in the appearance of BK virus nephropathy, which progresses to graft failure in a high percentage of patients. Although first associated with tacrolimus and MMF immunosuppression, recent data suggest that BK nephropathy appears with any kind of triple therapy. In conclusion, reducing risk factors for patient death should be a major target to improve outcomes after renal transplantation. Effort should be made to control cardiovascular diseases, malignancies and infections with improved use of immunosuppressive drugs. Preliminary results with belatacept suggest its safety and efficacy, and open new perspectives in the immunosuppression of de novo renal transplant recipients.
与普通人群相比,肾移植受者的死亡率有所增加。新型免疫抑制药物已将患者短期生存率提高至1 - 2年时的95%,但这些数据仍需长期随访加以证实。此外,就患者生存率而言,尚无哪种特定方案被证明优于其他方案。心血管疾病是肾移植受者最常见的死亡原因,虽然尚无免疫抑制药物与心血管事件直接相关,但免疫抑制药物对传统危险因素有不同影响。皮质类固醇和环孢素对体重增加、血压和血脂的负面影响最大。他克莫司会增加新发糖尿病的风险。西罗莫司和依维莫司对移植后高脂血症的危险因素影响最大。免疫抑制的调整可能会改善心血管状况,但几乎没有证据表明这些改变对患者预后有有益影响。恶性肿瘤也是一个日益增加的死亡原因,在某些系列研究中已超过心血管疾病。诱导治疗、硫唑嘌呤和钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂(CNIs)可能是与移植后恶性肿瘤关联最大的免疫抑制药物。霉酚酸酯(MMF)对恶性肿瘤的发生率没有负面影响。雷帕霉素靶蛋白(mTOR)抑制剂具有抗癌特性,且与较低的恶性肿瘤发生率相关。此外,已建议使用这些药物来减少恶性肿瘤患者中CNIs的剂量或停用CNIs。感染仍是肾移植受者发病和死亡的重要原因。一些免疫抑制药物,如MMF,会增加巨细胞病毒感染的发生率以及高危受者采取预防措施的必要性。强效免疫抑制治疗的使用导致了BK病毒肾病的出现,在高比例患者中会进展为移植肾失功。虽然最初认为BK肾病与他克莫司和MMF免疫抑制有关,但最近的数据表明,任何类型的三联疗法都会出现BK肾病。总之,降低患者死亡的危险因素应是改善肾移植后预后的主要目标。应努力通过更好地使用免疫抑制药物来控制心血管疾病、恶性肿瘤和感染。贝拉西普的初步结果表明了其安全性和有效性,并为初发肾移植受者的免疫抑制开辟了新的前景。