Department of Surgery, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
World J Surg Oncol. 2009 Oct 23;7:77. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-7-77.
Percutaneous core needle biopsy (CNB) is considered to be the standard technique for histological diagnosis of breast lesions. But, it is less reliable for diagnosing atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH). The purpose of the present study was to predict, based on clinical and radiological findings, which cases of ADH diagnosed by CNB would be more likely to be associated with a more advanced lesion on subsequent surgical excision.
Between February 2002 and December 2007, consecutive ultrasound-guided CNBs were performed on suspicious breast lesions at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital. A total of 69 CNBs led to a diagnosis of ADH, and 45 patients underwent follow-up surgical excision. We reviewed the medical records and analyses retrospectively.
Sixty-nine patients were diagnosed with ADH at CNB. Of these patients, 45 underwent surgical excision and 10 (22.2%) were subsequently diagnosed with a malignancy (ductal carcinoma in situ, n = 8; invasive cancer, n = 2). Univariate analysis revealed age (>or= 50-years) at the time of core needle biopsy (p = 0.006), size (> 10 mm) on imaging (p = 0.033), and combined mass with microcalcification on sonography (p = 0.029) to be associated with underestimation. When those three factors were included in multivariate analysis, only age (p = 0.035, HR 6.201, 95% CI 1.135-33.891) was an independent predictor of malignancy.
Age (>or= 50) at the time of biopsy is an independent predictive factor for breast cancer at surgical excision in patients with diagnosed ADH at CNB. For patients diagnosed with ADH at CNB, only complete surgical excision is the suitable treatment option, because we could not find any combination of factors that can safely predict the absence of DCIS or invasive cancer in a case of ADH.
经皮核心针活检(CNB)被认为是乳腺病变组织学诊断的标准技术。但是,对于不典型导管增生(ADH)的诊断准确性较低。本研究旨在根据临床和影像学表现,预测哪些通过 CNB 诊断为 ADH 的病例更有可能在后续的手术切除中与更高级别的病变相关。
2002 年 2 月至 2007 年 12 月,在首尔圣玛丽医院对可疑乳腺病变进行了连续的超声引导 CNB。总共 69 例 CNB 导致 ADH 诊断,45 例患者接受了随访手术切除。我们回顾性地分析了病历。
69 例患者在 CNB 中被诊断为 ADH。其中,45 例患者接受了手术切除,10 例(22.2%)随后被诊断为恶性肿瘤(导管原位癌,n=8;浸润性癌,n=2)。单因素分析显示,核心针活检时的年龄(≥50 岁)(p=0.006)、影像学上的大小(>10mm)(p=0.033)和超声检查中肿块合并微钙化(p=0.029)与低估有关。当将这三个因素纳入多因素分析时,只有年龄(p=0.035,HR 6.201,95%CI 1.135-33.891)是恶性肿瘤的独立预测因素。
在 CNB 诊断为 ADH 的患者中,活检时的年龄(≥50 岁)是手术切除时乳腺癌的独立预测因素。对于在 CNB 诊断为 ADH 的患者,只有完全手术切除才是合适的治疗选择,因为我们无法找到任何因素组合可以安全地预测 ADH 病例中不存在 DCIS 或浸润性癌。