Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Bone. 2010 Jan;46(1):24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.10.016. Epub 2009 Oct 21.
If muscle force is a primary source for triggering bone adaptation, with disuse and reloading, bone changes should follow muscle changes. We examined the timing and magnitude of changes in muscle cross-sectional area (MCSA) and bone architecture in response to muscle inactivity following botulinum toxin (BTX) injection. We hypothesized that MCSA would return to baseline levels sooner than bone properties following BTX injection. Female BALB mice (15 weeks old) were injected with 20 muL of BTX (1 U/100 g body mass, n=18) or saline (SAL, n=18) into the posterior calf musculature of one limb. The contralateral limb (CON) served as an internal control. MCSA and bone properties were assessed at baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks post-injection using in vivo micro-CT at the tibia proximal metaphysis (bone only) and diaphysis. Muscles were dissected and weighed after sacrifice. Significant GroupxLegxTime interactions indicated that the maximal decrease in MCSA (56%), proximal metaphyseal BV/TV (38%) and proximal diaphyseal Ct.Ar (7%) occurred 4 weeks after injection. There was no delay prior to bone recovery as both muscle and bone properties began to recover after this time, but MCSA and BV/TV remained 15% and 20% lower, respectively, in the BTX-injected leg than the BTX-CON leg 16 weeks post-injection. Gastrocnemius mass (primarily fast-twitch) was 14% lower in the BTX-injected leg than the SAL-injected leg, while soleus mass (primarily slow-twitch) was 15% greater in the BTX group than the SAL group. Our finding that muscle size and bone began to recover at similar times after BTX injection was unexpected. This suggested that partial weight-bearing and/or return of slow-twitch muscle activity in the BTX leg may have been sufficient to stimulate bone recovery. Alternatively, muscle function may have recovered sooner than MCSA. Our results indicated that muscle cross-sectional area, while important, may not be the primary factor associated with bone loss and recovery when muscle atrophy is induced through BTX injection. To understand the nature of the interaction between muscle and bone, future work should focus on the functional recovery of individual muscles in relation to bone.
如果肌肉力量是触发骨骼适应的主要来源,那么在肌肉失用和重新加载的情况下,骨骼变化应该跟随肌肉变化。我们研究了在肉毒毒素 (BTX) 注射后肌肉失用导致的肌肉横截面积 (MCSA) 和骨骼结构变化的时间和幅度。我们假设,在 BTX 注射后,MCSA 会比骨骼特性更快地恢复到基线水平。雌性 BALB 小鼠(15 周龄)在一侧后小腿肌肉中注射 20 μL BTX(1 U/100 g 体重,n=18)或生理盐水 (SAL,n=18)。对侧肢体(CON)作为内部对照。在注射后 2、4、8、12 和 16 周,通过胫骨近端干骺端(仅骨骼)和骨干的体内 micro-CT 评估 MCSA 和骨骼特性。在处死前,将肌肉解剖并称重。显著的 GroupxLegxTime 相互作用表明,MCSA(56%)、近端干骺端 BV/TV(38%)和近端骨干 Ct.Ar(7%)的最大下降发生在注射后 4 周。由于肌肉和骨骼特性在这段时间后开始恢复,因此在骨骼恢复之前没有延迟,但在注射后 16 周,BTX 注射侧的 MCSA 和 BV/TV 仍分别比 BTX 对照侧低 15%和 20%。BTX 注射侧的比目鱼肌质量(主要为快肌)比 SAL 注射侧低 14%,而 BTX 组的比目鱼肌质量(主要为慢肌)比 SAL 组高 15%。我们发现,BTX 注射后,肌肉大小和骨骼开始以相似的时间恢复,这令人意外。这表明,BTX 腿部的部分负重和/或慢肌活动的恢复可能足以刺激骨骼恢复。或者,肌肉功能可能比 MCSA 恢复得更快。我们的结果表明,当通过 BTX 注射诱导肌肉萎缩时,肌肉横截面积虽然很重要,但可能不是与骨骼丢失和恢复相关的主要因素。为了了解肌肉和骨骼之间相互作用的性质,未来的工作应该侧重于与骨骼相关的单个肌肉的功能恢复。