Saleem J J, Russ A L, Sanderson P, Johnson T R, Zhang J, Sittig D F
Veterans Affairs Health Services Research & Development Center on Implementing Evidence-Based Practice, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Yearb Med Inform. 2009:48-58.
Clinical information system (CIS) developers and implementers have begun to look to other scientific disciplines for new methods, tools, and techniques to help them better understand clinicians and their organizational structures, clinical work environments, capabilities of clinical information and communications technology, and the way these structures and processes interact. The goal of this article is to help CIS researchers, developers, implementers, and evaluators better understand the methods, tools, techniques, and literature of the field of human factors.
We developed a framework that explains how six key human factors topics relate to the design, implementation, and evaluation of CISs.
Using this framework we discuss the following six topics: 1) informatics and patient safety; 2) user interface design and evaluation; 3) workflow and task analysis; 4) clinical decision making and decision support; 5) distributed cognition; and 6) mental workload and situation awareness.
Integrating the methods, tools, and lessons learned from each of these six areas of human factors research early in CIS design and incorporating them iteratively during development can improve user performance, user satisfaction, and integration into clinical workflow. Ultimately, this approach will improve clinical information systems and healthcare delivery.
临床信息系统(CIS)的开发者和实施者已开始向其他科学学科寻求新的方法、工具和技术,以帮助他们更好地理解临床医生及其组织结构、临床工作环境、临床信息与通信技术的能力,以及这些结构和流程的相互作用方式。本文的目的是帮助CIS研究人员、开发者、实施者和评估人员更好地理解人因工程学领域的方法、工具、技术和文献。
我们开发了一个框架,用以解释人因工程学的六个关键主题如何与CIS的设计、实施和评估相关联。
利用这个框架,我们讨论以下六个主题:1)信息学与患者安全;2)用户界面设计与评估;3)工作流程与任务分析;4)临床决策与决策支持;5)分布式认知;6)心理负荷与态势感知。
在CIS设计的早期阶段整合从人因工程学研究的这六个领域中汲取的方法、工具和经验教训,并在开发过程中反复纳入这些内容,可以提高用户绩效、用户满意度,并促进融入临床工作流程。最终,这种方法将改善临床信息系统和医疗服务。