• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床决策支持系统不断变化的本质:聚焦消费者、基因组学、公共卫生与决策安全。

The changing nature of clinical decision support systems: a focus on consumers, genomics, public health and decision safety.

作者信息

Coiera E, Lau A Y S, Tsafnat G, Sintchenko V, Magrabi F

机构信息

Centre for Health Informatics, University of New South Wales, UNSW 2052 NSW Australia.

出版信息

Yearb Med Inform. 2009:84-95.

PMID:19855878
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To review the recent research literature in clinical decision support systems (CDSS).

METHODS

A review of recent literature was undertaken, focussing on CDSS evaluation, consumers and public health, the impact of translational bioinformatics on CDSS design, and CDSS safety.

RESULTS

In recent years, researchers have concentrated much less on the development of decision technologies, and have focussed more on the impact of CDSS in the clinical world. Recent work highlights that traditional process measures of CDSS effectiveness, such as document relevance are poor proxy measures for decision outcomes. Measuring the dynamics of decision making, for example via decision velocity, may produce a more accurate picture of effectiveness. Another trend is the broadening of user base for CDSS beyond front line clinicians. Consumers are now a major focus for biomedical informatics, as are public health officials, tasked with detecting and managing disease outbreaks at a health system, rather than individual patient level. Bioinformatics is also changing the nature of CDSS. Apart from personalisation of therapy recommendations, translational bioinformatics is creating new challenges in the interpretation of the meaning of genetic data. Finally, there is much recent interest in the safety and effectiveness of computerised physician order entry (CPOE) systems, given that prescribing and administration errors are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Of note, there is still much controversy surrounding the contention that poorly designed, implemented or used CDSS may actually lead to harm.

CONCLUSIONS

CDSS research remains an active and evolving area of research, as CDSS penetrate more widely beyond their traditional domain into consumer decision support, and as decisions become more complex, for example by involving sequence level genetic data.

摘要

目的

回顾临床决策支持系统(CDSS)的近期研究文献。

方法

对近期文献进行综述,重点关注CDSS评估、消费者与公共卫生、转化生物信息学对CDSS设计的影响以及CDSS安全性。

结果

近年来,研究人员对决策技术开发的关注大幅减少,而更多地聚焦于CDSS在临床领域的影响。近期研究表明,传统的CDSS有效性过程指标,如文档相关性,对于决策结果而言是较差的替代指标。通过决策速度等方式衡量决策动态,可能会更准确地反映有效性。另一个趋势是CDSS的用户群体从一线临床医生扩展到了其他人群。消费者如今成为生物医学信息学的主要关注对象,公共卫生官员也是如此,他们负责在卫生系统层面而非个体患者层面检测和管理疾病爆发。生物信息学也在改变CDSS的性质。除了治疗建议的个性化之外,转化生物信息学在解读基因数据的意义方面带来了新的挑战。最后,鉴于处方和给药错误是发病和死亡的重要原因,近期人们对计算机化医生医嘱录入(CPOE)系统的安全性和有效性兴趣浓厚。值得注意的是,对于设计、实施或使用不当的CDSS可能实际上会导致伤害这一观点,仍存在诸多争议。

结论

随着CDSS更广泛地渗透到传统领域之外,进入消费者决策支持领域,并且决策变得更加复杂,例如涉及序列水平的基因数据,CDSS研究仍然是一个活跃且不断发展的研究领域。

相似文献

1
The changing nature of clinical decision support systems: a focus on consumers, genomics, public health and decision safety.临床决策支持系统不断变化的本质:聚焦消费者、基因组学、公共卫生与决策安全。
Yearb Med Inform. 2009:84-95.
2
The safety and quality of decision support systems.决策支持系统的安全性与质量。
Yearb Med Inform. 2006:20-5.
3
Evaluation and certification of computerized provider order entry systems.计算机化医嘱录入系统的评估与认证
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Jan-Feb;14(1):48-55. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2248. Epub 2006 Oct 31.
4
Clinical decision support systems in the pediatric intensive care unit.儿科重症监护病房中的临床决策支持系统。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2009 Jan;10(1):23-8. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181936b23.
5
The impact of pharmacy computerised clinical decision support on prescribing, clinical and patient outcomes: a systematic review of the literature.药学计算机化临床决策支持对处方、临床及患者结局的影响:文献系统评价
Int J Pharm Pract. 2010 Apr;18(2):69-87.
6
Implementation of a clinical decision support system for computerized drug prescription entries in a large tertiary care hospital.在一家大型三级护理医院实施用于计算机化药物处方录入的临床决策支持系统。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2014 May;16(5):289-94.
7
Clinical decision support systems to improve utilization of thromboprophylaxis: a review of the literature and experience with implementation of a computerized physician order entry program.改善血栓预防措施使用情况的临床决策支持系统:文献综述及计算机化医师医嘱录入程序的实施经验
Hosp Pract (1995). 2012 Aug;40(3):27-39. doi: 10.3810/hp.2012.08.987.
8
Psychosocial determinants of physicians' acceptance of recommendations by antibiotic computerised decision support systems: A mixed methods study.抗生素计算机决策支持系统推荐意见的医生接受的心理社会决定因素:一项混合方法研究。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015 Mar;45(3):295-304. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.10.009. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
9
Implementation of Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) with Clinical Decision Support (CDS) features in Riyadh Hospitals to improve quality of information.在利雅得各医院实施具有临床决策支持(CDS)功能的计算机化医师医嘱录入(CPOE)系统,以提高信息质量。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;180:776-80.
10
Literature review on clinical decision support system reducing medical error.关于临床决策支持系统减少医疗差错的文献综述。
J Evid Based Med. 2014 Aug;7(3):219-26. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12111.

引用本文的文献

1
Testing an individualized digital decision assist system for the diagnosis and management of mental and behavior disorders in children and adolescents.测试一种个体化数字决策辅助系统,用于诊断和管理儿童和青少年的精神和行为障碍。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Sep 17;20(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01239-2.
2
Development of a Tailored Intervention With Computerized Clinical Decision Support to Improve Quality of Care for Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: Multi-Method Study.开发一种基于计算机化临床决策支持的个性化干预措施以提高膝骨关节炎患者的护理质量:多方法研究。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Jun 11;7(6):e154. doi: 10.2196/resprot.9927.
3
Tailoring implementation strategies for evidence-based recommendations using computerised clinical decision support systems: protocol for the development of the GUIDES tools.
使用计算机化临床决策支持系统为基于证据的建议量身定制实施策略:GUIDES工具开发方案
Implement Sci. 2016 Mar 5;11:29. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0393-7.
4
Dynamic software design for clinical exome and genome analyses: insights from bioinformaticians, clinical geneticists, and genetic counselors.用于临床外显子组和基因组分析的动态软件设计:来自生物信息学家、临床遗传学家和遗传咨询师的见解。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Mar;23(2):257-68. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv053. Epub 2015 Jun 27.