• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

时间分辨率与动态对比增强 MRI 乳腺诊断性能的关系。

Relationship of temporal resolution to diagnostic performance for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast.

机构信息

National Institutes of Health, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Nov;30(5):999-1004. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21947.

DOI:10.1002/jmri.21947
PMID:19856413
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2935260/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship between temporal resolution of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and classification of breast lesions as benign versus malignant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients underwent T(1)-weighted DCE MRI with 15 s/acquisition temporal resolution using 1.5 Tesla (n = 48) and 3.0T (n = 33) MRI scanners. Seventy-nine patients had pathologically proven diagnosis and 2 had 2 years follow-up showing no change in lesion size. The temporal resolution of DCE MRI was systematically reduced as a postprocessing step from 15 to 30, 45, and 60 s/acquisition by eliminating intermediate time points. Average wash-in and wash-out slopes, wash-out percentage changes, and kinetic curve shape (persistently enhancing, plateau, or wash-out) were compared for each temporal resolution. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used to compare kinetic parameters and diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS

Sixty patients (74%) had malignant lesions and 21 patients (26%) had benign lesions. All temporal-resolution parameters significantly predicted benign versus malignant diagnosis (P < 0.05). However, 45 s/acquisition and higher temporal-resolution datasets showed higher accuracy than the 60 s/acquisition dataset by ROC curve analysis (0.72 versus 0.69 for average wash-in slope; 0.85 versus 0.82, for average wash-out slope; and 0.88 versus 0.80 for kinetic curve shape assessment, for 45 s/acquisition versus 60 s/acquisition temporal-resolution datasets, respectively (P = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

DCE MRI data with at least 45-s temporal resolution maximized the agreement between the kinetic parameters and correct classification of benign versus malignant diagnosis.

摘要

目的

研究动态对比增强(DCE)磁共振成像(MRI)的时间分辨率与乳腺病变良恶性分类之间的关系。

材料与方法

患者在 1.5T(n=48)和 3.0T(n=33)磁共振扫描仪上进行 T1 加权 DCE MRI 检查,采集时间分辨率为 15 秒/次。79 例患者经病理证实诊断,2 例患者经 2 年随访显示病变大小无变化。DCE MRI 的时间分辨率通过在后处理步骤中消除中间时间点,从 15 秒/次逐步减少到 30、45 和 60 秒/次。比较了每种时间分辨率的平均强化斜率、洗脱斜率、洗脱百分比变化和动力学曲线形状(持续强化、平台或洗脱)。采用逻辑回归和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析比较动力学参数和诊断准确性。

结果

60 例(74%)患者为恶性病变,21 例(26%)患者为良性病变。所有时间分辨率参数均显著预测良恶性诊断(P<0.05)。然而,通过 ROC 曲线分析,45 秒/次采集和更高时间分辨率数据集的准确性高于 60 秒/次采集数据集(平均强化斜率分别为 0.72 与 0.69;平均洗脱斜率分别为 0.85 与 0.82;动力学曲线形状评估分别为 0.88 与 0.80;45 秒/次采集与 60 秒/次采集数据集,P=0.027)。

结论

DCE MRI 数据的时间分辨率至少为 45 秒,可以最大限度地提高动力学参数与良恶性诊断正确分类之间的一致性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff97/2935260/891f76f9a9b8/nihms-185629-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff97/2935260/c3ef51b040da/nihms-185629-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff97/2935260/f2b28f60f757/nihms-185629-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff97/2935260/f343d1c140ff/nihms-185629-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff97/2935260/404eafe68727/nihms-185629-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff97/2935260/36caafd35aa2/nihms-185629-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff97/2935260/891f76f9a9b8/nihms-185629-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff97/2935260/c3ef51b040da/nihms-185629-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff97/2935260/f2b28f60f757/nihms-185629-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff97/2935260/f343d1c140ff/nihms-185629-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff97/2935260/404eafe68727/nihms-185629-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff97/2935260/36caafd35aa2/nihms-185629-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff97/2935260/891f76f9a9b8/nihms-185629-f0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Relationship of temporal resolution to diagnostic performance for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast.时间分辨率与动态对比增强 MRI 乳腺诊断性能的关系。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Nov;30(5):999-1004. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21947.
2
Breast DCE-MRI: influence of postcontrast timing on automated lesion kinetics assessments and discrimination of benign and malignant lesions.乳腺动态对比增强磁共振成像:对比剂注射后时间对病变自动动力学评估及良恶性病变鉴别的影响
Acad Radiol. 2014 Sep;21(9):1195-203. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.04.013. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
3
3-T dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: pharmacokinetic parameters versus conventional kinetic curve analysis.3-T 动态对比增强磁共振成像在乳腺中的应用:药代动力学参数与常规动力学曲线分析。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Dec;197(6):1498-505. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4665.
4
Effect of Temporal Resolution on Diagnostic Performance of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate.时间分辨率对前列腺动态对比增强磁共振成像诊断性能的影响。
Invest Radiol. 2016 May;51(5):290-6. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000234.
5
Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: quantitative method for kinetic curve type assessment.乳腺动态对比增强磁共振成像:动力学曲线类型评估的定量方法
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Oct;193(4):W295-300. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2483.
6
Intraindividual Comparison of Ultrafast versus Standard Two-dimensional Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Breast MRI.超快与标准二维动态对比增强乳腺磁共振成像的个体内比较
Radiology. 2025 May;315(2):e241371. doi: 10.1148/radiol.241371.
7
The kinetic analysis of breast cancer: An investigation of the optimal temporal resolution for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.乳腺癌的动力学分析:动态对比增强磁共振成像最佳时间分辨率的研究。
Clin Imaging. 2020 May;61:4-10. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.01.004. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
8
Diagnosis of Spinal Lesions Using Heuristic and Pharmacokinetic Parameters Measured by Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI.利用动态对比增强磁共振成像测量的启发式和药代动力学参数诊断脊柱病变
Acad Radiol. 2017 Jul;24(7):867-875. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.12.014. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
9
Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI.动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)中乳腺病变特征性动力学曲线的自动识别与分类
Med Phys. 2006 Aug;33(8):2878-87. doi: 10.1118/1.2210568.
10
Differentiation between subcentimeter carcinomas and benign lesions using kinetic parameters derived from ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI.利用超快动态对比增强乳腺 MRI 获得的动力学参数区分亚厘米大小的癌与良性病变。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Feb;30(2):756-766. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06392-5. Epub 2019 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Modeling Reductions in Liver Fat: Comparing Noninvasive Tests to Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Proton Density Fat Fraction.肝脏脂肪减少的建模:将非侵入性检测与磁共振成像-质子密度脂肪分数进行比较
Gastro Hep Adv. 2025 Apr 8;4(7):100669. doi: 10.1016/j.gastha.2025.100669. eCollection 2025.
2
Ultrafast Breast MRI: Possibly Just a Diagnostic Compromise to Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Imaging.超快乳腺磁共振成像:可能只是对动态对比增强成像的一种诊断折衷方案。
Radiology. 2025 May;315(2):e250746. doi: 10.1148/radiol.250746.
3
Data-driven machine learning algorithm model for pneumonia prediction and determinant factor stratification among children aged 6-23 months in Ethiopia.用于埃塞俄比亚6至23个月儿童肺炎预测及决定因素分层的数据驱动型机器学习算法模型
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 May 2;25(1):647. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10916-4.
4
Prediction Models of Infective Endocarditis Usable Ahead of Performing Blood Cultures: A Narrative Review.血培养前可用的感染性心内膜炎预测模型:一项叙述性综述。
Cureus. 2025 Feb 8;17(2):e78754. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78754. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
Investigation into the sero-molecular prevalence of Brucella melitensis in small ruminants in districts Mohmand and Charsadda Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan.巴基斯坦开伯尔-普赫图赫瓦省莫赫曼德和查尔萨达地区小型反刍动物中布鲁氏菌病羊种血清分子流行情况调查
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 7;20(2):e0315206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315206. eCollection 2025.
6
An updated model of rural hospital financial distress.农村医院财务困境的更新模型。
J Rural Health. 2025 Mar;41(2):e12882. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12882. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
7
The association between anthropometric indices and ischemic heart disease: a large-scale cross-sectional study on the Iranian population.人体测量指数与缺血性心脏病的关系:伊朗人群的大规模横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 15;14(1):18950. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54148-z.
8
Performance of the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of severity and mortality in children and adolescents with traumatic brain injury.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对儿童和青少年创伤性脑损伤严重程度和死亡率的预测价值。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2024 Dec;40(12):4251-4257. doi: 10.1007/s00381-024-06556-9. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
9
Evaluation of the Urine POC-CCA Test Accuracy in the Detection of Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.尿液即时检验-循环免疫复合物分析检测感染的准确性评估:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Trop Med. 2024 Jul 15;2024:5531687. doi: 10.1155/2024/5531687. eCollection 2024.
10
Predicting factors for extremity fracture among border-fall patients using machine learning computing.运用机器学习算法预测边境跌倒患者四肢骨折的相关因素。
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 3;10(11):e32185. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32185. eCollection 2024 Jun 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic and morphologic MR characteristics compared with mammographic appearance and nuclear grade.单纯导管原位癌:与乳腺钼靶表现及核分级相比的动力学和形态学磁共振特征
Radiology. 2007 Dec;245(3):684-91. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2453062061.
2
Integration of quantitative DCE-MRI and ADC mapping to monitor treatment response in human breast cancer: initial results.定量动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)与表观扩散系数(ADC)图相结合用于监测人类乳腺癌治疗反应:初步结果
Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Jan;25(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2006.09.006. Epub 2006 Nov 21.
3
Glioma assessment using quantitative blood volume maps generated by T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a receiver operating characteristic study.
Acta Radiol. 2006 Apr;47(3):303-10. doi: 10.1080/02841850500539033.
4
Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study.乳腺磁共振成像的诊断性结构和动态特征:多中心研究
Radiology. 2006 Jan;238(1):42-53. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2381042117.
5
Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution.乳腺动态双侧对比增强磁共振成像:空间分辨率与时间分辨率之间的权衡
Radiology. 2005 Sep;236(3):789-800. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2363040811.
6
Differentiation of benign from malignant breast disease associated with screening detected microcalcifications using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.利用动态对比增强磁共振成像鉴别与筛查发现的微钙化相关的乳腺良恶性疾病。
Breast. 2006 Feb;15(1):29-38. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2005.05.002. Epub 2005 Jul 5.
7
Variability in the description of morphologic and contrast enhancement characteristics of breast lesions on magnetic resonance imaging.乳腺病变在磁共振成像上形态学及对比增强特征描述的变异性。
Invest Radiol. 2005 Jun;40(6):355-62. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000163741.16718.3e.
8
Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy.活检前的乳腺磁共振成像。
JAMA. 2004 Dec 8;292(22):2735-42. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.22.2735.
9
Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of tumor perfusion. Approaches and biomedical challenges.肿瘤灌注的动态磁共振成像。方法与生物医学挑战。
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2004 Sep-Oct;23(5):65-83. doi: 10.1109/memb.2004.1360410.
10
Detection of breast malignancy: diagnostic MR protocol for improved specificity.乳腺恶性肿瘤的检测:提高特异性的诊断性磁共振成像方案
Radiology. 2004 Aug;232(2):585-91. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2322030547. Epub 2004 Jun 17.