• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

死刑的废除:两位19世纪意大利精神病学家的贡献。

The abolition of capital punishment: contributions from two nineteenth-century Italian psychiatrists.

作者信息

Peloso Paolo Francesco, Dening Tom

机构信息

Mental Health Department, Genoa, Italy.

出版信息

Hist Psychiatry. 2009 Jun;20(78 Pt 2):215-25. doi: 10.1177/0957154X08094237.

DOI:10.1177/0957154X08094237
PMID:19856684
Abstract

Capital punishment was the source of lively debate in Italy, from unification in 1861 until 1888. The precedent for abolishing the death penalty had been set in Tuscany in 1786. This paper presents the arguments put forward by two eminent psychiatrists who opposed the death penalty, Carlo Livi and Andrea Verga. Livi set out his scientific case for abolition in two addresses given to the Accademia dei Fisiocritici in Siena in 1862. In 1889 Verga wrote a commentary on the Senate sitting and argued in favour of approving the Italian Penal Code. Verga agreed with Livi's arguments and disagreed with the School of Criminal Anthropology, led by Cesare Lombroso and Raffaele Garofalo, who were both in favour of capital punishment.

摘要

从1861年意大利统一到1888年,死刑一直是意大利激烈辩论的话题。1786年托斯卡纳就开创了废除死刑的先例。本文介绍了两位反对死刑的著名精神病学家卡洛·利维(Carlo Livi)和安德烈亚·韦尔加(Andrea Verga)提出的论点。1862年,利维在锡耶纳的物理医学研究院发表了两次演讲,阐述了废除死刑的科学依据。1889年,韦尔加撰写了一篇关于参议院会议的评论文章,并主张批准意大利刑法典。韦尔加同意利维的观点,不同意由切萨雷·龙勃罗梭(Cesare Lombroso)和拉斐尔·加罗法洛(Raffaele Garofalo)领导的刑事人类学派的观点,他们两人都支持死刑。

相似文献

1
The abolition of capital punishment: contributions from two nineteenth-century Italian psychiatrists.死刑的废除:两位19世纪意大利精神病学家的贡献。
Hist Psychiatry. 2009 Jun;20(78 Pt 2):215-25. doi: 10.1177/0957154X08094237.
2
AAPL and the death penalty: a historical perspective on the debate.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2005;33(1):6-7.
3
The decline of federalism and the rise of morality-policy conflict in the United States.
Publius. 2000;30(1-2):171-88.
4
[Abolition of capital punishment in public in England].[英国废除公开处决死刑]
Quad Criminol Clin. 1975 Jul-Sep;17(3):367-80.
5
[Against the death penalty, an abolitionist in the Medical-psychological Society:Felix Voisin].
Ann Med Psychol (Paris). 1993 Mar;151(3):293-6; discussion 296-8.
6
The death penalty and Bernard Diamond's approach to forensic psychiatry.死刑与伯纳德·戴蒙德的法医精神病学方法。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1992;20(2):197-210.
7
The trial of the skull studied by the founder of Criminal Anthropology: The war of the Lombroso Museum.犯罪人类学创始人所研究的颅骨试验:隆布罗索博物馆之战。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2018 Oct;59:13-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2018.07.011. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
8
[Role of psychiatrists in capital punishment cases : a review].[精神科医生在死刑案件中的作用:综述]
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2002;104(3):229-40.
9
The Royal College of Psychiatrists and the death penalty.皇家精神病医学院与死刑
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2004;32(2):188-91.
10
An uphill battle: A case example of government policy and activist dissent on the death penalty for drug-related offences in Indonesia.一场艰难的斗争:印度尼西亚政府政策与活动人士对涉毒犯罪死刑的分歧案例
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Jun;92:103265. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103265. Epub 2021 May 5.