Sahoo Bijay Kumar, Das Ayan, Agarwal Sangita, Bhaumik Uttam, Bose Anirbandeep, Ghosh Debotri, Roy Bikash, Pal Tapan Kumar
Bioequivalence Study Centre, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India.
Arzneimittelforschung. 2009;59(9):451-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1296424.
The aim of the present study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of rabeprazole (CAS 117976-89-3) and itopride (CAS 122898-67-3) after oral administration of a rabeprazole (20 mg)-itopride (150 mg) fixed dose combination (FDC) in healthy human volunteers. The bioequivalence of two formulations (test and reference) was determined in 12 healthy Indian male volunteers (age: 25.25 +/- 4.69 years; weight: 60.50 +/- 5.04 kg) in a randomized, single-dose, two-period, two-treatment crossover study. Both formulations were administered orally as a single dose, with the treatments separated by a washout period of 1 week. Rabeprazole and itopride plasma levels were determined by a validated HPLC method using UV detection. The formulations were compared using the pharmacokinetic parameters area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-t)), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax). General linear model (GLM) procedures were used in which sources of variation were subject, treatment and period. The results indicated that there were no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) between the logarithmically transformed AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax values between test and reference formulation. The 90% confidence interval for the ratio of the logarithmically transformed AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax were within the bioequivalence limits of 0.8-1.25 and the relative bioavailability of rabeprazole and itopride test and reference formulations was 98.24 and 93.65%, respectively.
本研究的目的是比较雷贝拉唑(CAS 117976-89-3)和伊托必利(CAS 122898-67-3)在健康人类志愿者口服雷贝拉唑(20 mg)-伊托必利(150 mg)固定剂量复方制剂(FDC)后的药代动力学。在一项随机、单剂量、两周期、两治疗交叉研究中,对12名健康印度男性志愿者(年龄:25.25±4.69岁;体重:60.50±5.04 kg)测定了两种制剂(试验制剂和参比制剂)的生物等效性。两种制剂均口服单剂量给药,治疗间隔1周的洗脱期。采用经验证的高效液相色谱法(HPLC)并使用紫外检测法测定雷贝拉唑和伊托必利的血浆水平。使用药代动力学参数血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC(0-t))、从零到无穷大的血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC(0-infinity))和血浆峰浓度(Cmax)对制剂进行比较。使用一般线性模型(GLM)程序,其中变异来源为受试者、治疗和周期。结果表明,试验制剂和参比制剂对数转换后的AUC(0-infinity)和Cmax值之间无统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。对数转换后的AUC(0-t)、AUC(0-infinity)和Cmax比值的90%置信区间在生物等效性限度0.8-1.25内,雷贝拉唑和伊托必利试验制剂和参比制剂的相对生物利用度分别为98.24%和93.65%。