Morton Melinda J, Kirsch Thomas D, Rothman Richard E, Byerly Marielle M, Hsieh Yu-Hsiang, McManus John G, Kelen Gabor D
Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Am J Disaster Med. 2009 Jul-Aug;4(4):199-206.
To quantify the readiness of individual academic emergency departments (EDs) in the United States for an outbreak of pandemic influenza. METHODS, DESIGN, AND SETTING: Cross-sectional assessment of influenza pandemic preparedness level of EDs in the United States via survey of medical directors and department chairs from the 135 academic emergency medicine departments in the United States. Preparedness assessed using a novel score of 15 critical preparedness indicators. Data analysis consisted of summary statistics, chi2, and ANOVA.
ED medical directors and department chairs.
One hundred and thirty academic emergency medicine departments contacted; 66 (50.4 percent) responded. Approximately half (56.0 percent) stated their ED had a written plan for pandemic influenza response. Mean preparedness score was 7.2 (SD = 4.0) out of 15 (48.0 percent); only one program (1.5 percent) achieved a perfect score. Respondents from programs with larger EDs (= 30 beds) were more likely to have a higher preparedness score (p < 0.035), an ED pandemic preparedness plan (p = 0.004) and a hospital pandemic preparedness plan (p = 0.007). Respondents from programs with larger EDs were more likely to feel that their ED was prepared for a pandemic or other major disease outbreak (p = 0.01). Only one-third (34.0 percent) felt their ED was prepared for a major disease outbreak, and only 27 percent felt their hospital was prepared to respond to a major disease outbreak.
Significant deficits in preparedness for pandemic influenza and other disease outbreaks exist in US EDs, relative to HHS guidelines, which appear to be related in part to ED size. Further study should be undertaken to determine the barriers to appropriate pandemic preparedness, as well as to develop and validate preparedness metrics.
量化美国各学术性急诊科应对甲型H1N1流感大流行的准备情况。方法、设计与研究地点:通过对美国135个学术性急诊医学科的医务主任和科室主任进行调查,对美国急诊科甲型H1N1流感大流行的准备水平进行横断面评估。使用15项关键准备指标的新评分来评估准备情况。数据分析包括描述性统计、卡方检验和方差分析。
急诊科医务主任和科室主任。
联系了130个学术性急诊医学科;66个(50.4%)做出了回应。约一半(56.0%)表示其急诊科有应对甲型H1N1流感大流行的书面计划。15项指标的平均准备评分为7.2(标准差=4.0)(48.0%);只有一个科室(1.5%)获得满分。来自规模较大(≥30张床位)急诊科的受访者更有可能获得更高的准备评分(p<0.035)、拥有急诊科甲型H1N1流感大流行准备计划(p=0.004)和医院甲型H1N1流感大流行准备计划(p=0.007)。来自规模较大急诊科的受访者更有可能认为其急诊科已为甲型H1N1流感大流行或其他重大疾病爆发做好准备(p=0.01)。只有三分之一(34.0%)的人认为其急诊科已为重大疾病爆发做好准备,只有27%的人认为其医院已做好应对重大疾病爆发的准备。
相对于美国卫生与公众服务部的指南,美国急诊科在应对甲型H1N1流感大流行和其他疾病爆发方面存在重大不足,这似乎部分与急诊科规模有关。应进一步开展研究,以确定适当的甲型H1N1流感大流行准备工作的障碍,并制定和验证准备指标。