Suppr超能文献

从猪霍乱病例中分离出的副伤寒杆菌的研究。

A STUDY OF PARATYPHOID BACILLI ISOLATED FROM CASES OF HOG-CHOLERA.

机构信息

Department of Animal Pathology of The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, Princeton, N. J.

出版信息

J Exp Med. 1918 Nov 30;28(6):759-77. doi: 10.1084/jem.28.6.759.

Abstract

During the course of some experimental work on hog-cholera, paratyphoid bacilli were isolated from 16 per cent of the pigs. Culturally these organisms are the same as paratyphoid 18 isolated from man, while they show several differences from hog-cholera bacilli. In their slight pathogenic effect on rabbits they also differ from the hog-cholera bacillus. In their agglutination in sera produced by the injection of living cultures, one of the cultures, isolated from a chronic case, corresponds to Bacillus enteritidis, while the other five are apparently in a class by themselves. They resemble paratyphoid beta more closely than hog-cholera bacilli, but the type of clumps formed and absorption experiments show that they are different from either. Whether these differences are enough to make it necessary to put them into a class by themselves is questionable, but the fact that when injected into rabbits they produce an immunity to the hog-cholera bacillus, while paratyphoid beta does not, is additional evidence in favor of such a classification. Complement fixation experiments have been of little value in differentiating the members of this group, but on the contrary show their close relationship. It seems probable that some of the cultures that are described in the literature as hog-cholera bacilli really belong to this group, which would account for much of the confusion that exists in the classification of the interesting, truly pathogenic bacillus that at one time was thought to be the cause of hog-cholera and in the series of animals with which we have worked has not appeared once. Whether the ingestion of pork containing these bacilli would cause disease in man is a question that can only be decided by a more careful bacteriological study of the organisms causing food poisonings and paratyphoid fever.

摘要

在进行猪霍乱实验工作的过程中,从 16%的猪身上分离出了副伤寒杆菌。从文化上讲,这些生物体与从人身上分离出的副伤寒 18 型相同,而与猪霍乱杆菌有几个不同之处。在对兔子的轻微致病作用方面,它们也与猪霍乱杆菌不同。在对活培养物注射产生的血清中的凝集反应中,从慢性病例中分离出的一种培养物与肠沙门氏菌相对应,而其他五种培养物显然自成一类。它们与副伤寒β型更为相似,而不是猪霍乱杆菌,但凝块形成的类型和吸收实验表明它们与两者都不同。这些差异是否足以使其有必要自成一类是值得怀疑的,但事实是,当将它们注射到兔子体内时,它们会产生对猪霍乱杆菌的免疫力,而副伤寒β型则不会,这是支持这种分类的额外证据。补体固定实验在区分该组的成员方面几乎没有价值,但相反表明了它们的密切关系。似乎有一些在文献中被描述为猪霍乱杆菌的培养物实际上属于该组,这可以解释为什么在分类上存在如此多的混乱,因为该组中存在着一种有趣的、真正致病的杆菌,曾经被认为是猪霍乱的病因,而在我们研究过的一系列动物中,这种杆菌从未出现过。食用含有这些杆菌的猪肉是否会导致人类患病,这是一个只能通过对引起食物中毒和副伤寒的生物体进行更仔细的细菌学研究才能确定的问题。

相似文献

10

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验