Department of Pathology of the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine and Cincinnati General Hospital, Cincinnati.
J Exp Med. 1923 Aug 31;38(3):263-73. doi: 10.1084/jem.38.3.263.
If the spleen be removed from rabbits and tubercle bacilli be injected intravenously, it is found that the lesions produced differ materially from those observed in control animals; the lungs present the most marked contrast, the liver also shows a definite difference in the distribution of the tubercles, and the kidney lesions also differ in the two instances. In discussing these facts we must answer, if possible, the four questions formulated above. It appears that the pulmonary lesions in Group S are small and discrete because of some inhibitory factor that prevents the diffusion of the products of dead tubercle bacilli. The organisms, far from being killed, are more numerous and better preserved in this group, but their destructive action is localized. This seems to be connected with the presence of polymorphonuclear leucocytes, for these cells are more numerous in the lesions and more plentiful in the lumina of the pulmonary capillaries of Group S than they are in the controls. The conclusion to be drawn from this covers the answer to the second question. It is not the tubercle bacillus itself that produces the destructive changes, but the toxins liberated by the breaking down of its substance. The well known experiments of Hodenpyl and Armand-Delille, already referred to in this series of papers, show this to be true; dead tubercle bacilli, or even extracts of these organisms, will produce typical tubercles. Removing the spleen stimulates the production of polymorphonuclear leucocytes, as shown by Johnstone (1922). These cells may prevent the diffusion of split products from the bacilli by removing or neutralizing them. The third question, as to why the liver is more affected after splenectomy than in normal controls, is more readily answered. Probably the spleen acts as a catch-basin for the bacteria; once removed it can no longer withhold them from the portal circulation and the liver receives a larger number than it would were this bacterial filter still operative. On the other hand, there may be an increase in the phagocytic activity of the endothelium of the sinusoids which might take up more bacteria under these changed conditions. Several investigators have claimed, recently, that there is an increased activity of the liver endothelium following splenectomy, their experiments being directed chiefly toward determining the fate of the erythrocytes. Pearce (1918) in reporting the effects of experimental splenectomy in dogs, states that there are definite compensatory changes in the lymph nodes, in the form of an increased proliferation of endothelial phagocytes, and that the stellate cells of the liver sinusoids often show a similar compensatory increase in number. In both cases the cells are, apparently, formed in situ rather than transported to the organs. He says: 'Such findings suggest the development of a compensatory function on the part of the lymph-nodes and possibly the liver,' and suggests that, in times of stress 'the stellate cells of the liver thus assume, in part at least, the function of destroying red blood-corpuscles by phagocytosis.' Incidentally, he presents an excellent discussion of the history and subject of splenectomy. Motohashi (1922) reports a great increase in the hemophagic power of the hepatic endothelium and an increase in the number of endothelial elements, after some 45 days following splenectomy in rabbits. Nishikawa and Takagi (1922) have observed similar phenomena with white rats, the Kupffer cells taking up erythrocytes in large numbers in splenectomized animals, whereas controls never show similar propensities on the part of these cells. It may be that different substances cause different reactions on the part of the hepatic endothelium. Contributory Experiment.-A side experiment was performed with five rabbits, two splenectomized and three controls, into which uniform doses of pneumococci were injected intravenously. They all died of septicemia after a few days. The results of this experiment strengthen the foregoing conclusions materially. It was found that there were many polymorphonuclear amphophils in the pulmonary capillaries of the splenectomized animals and that there were numerous focal necroses in the livers. The controls showed much fewer polymorphonuclear cells in the lungs and no focal necroses in the livers, while the spleens were actively congested and inflamed. Otherwise the experiment was not of sufficient importance to warrant a separate report. The question as to why the endothelium of the pulmonary capillaries shows no stimulation similar to that observed in the carbon experiment, but rather less activity than that of the controls, must be answered hypothetically for the present. With the carbon, comparatively huge amounts of foreign matter were injected repeatedly; here but one injection of a much smaller amount of suspended tubercle bacilli was administered. The resulting stimulus to the pulmonary endothelium would, therefore, differ materially in the two instances. In one there would be succeeding waves of stimulation following each injection of irritating foreign substance. In the other an entirely different sort of stimulus would result; the bacteria would be withdrawn from the circulation within an hour or two, judging by past experience, and would then multiply, to be cast off into the circulation in driblets, as the lesions containing them broke down. At least it can be said that there is a good theoretical reason for the difference in the endothelial reaction in the lungs of the two groups of animals.
如果从兔子身上切除脾脏,并静脉内注射结核杆菌,会发现所产生的病变与对照动物观察到的病变有很大不同;肺部的变化最为显著,肝脏中结核结节的分布也有明显的差异,肾脏的病变在这两种情况下也不同。在讨论这些事实时,我们必须尽可能回答上述四个问题。看来,由于某种抑制因子阻止了死结核杆菌产物的扩散,组 S 的肺部病变较小且离散。这些生物体不仅没有被杀死,而且在组 S 中数量更多,保存得更好,但它们的破坏作用是局部的。这似乎与多形核白细胞的存在有关,因为这些细胞在病变中更为丰富,在组 S 的肺毛细血管中比在对照组中更为丰富。从这一结论中可以得出答案,即回答了第二个问题。不是结核杆菌本身产生了破坏性变化,而是其物质分解产生的毒素。正如本系列论文中已经提到的,Hodenpyl 和 Armand-Delille 的著名实验证明了这一点;死结核杆菌,甚至这些生物体的提取物,都会产生典型的结核结节。Johnstone(1922)证明,切除脾脏会刺激多形核白细胞的产生。这些细胞可能通过去除或中和它们来阻止细菌分裂产物的扩散。第三个问题,即为什么脾切除术后肝脏比正常对照更容易受到影响,更容易回答。可能脾脏充当了细菌的“截留器”;一旦切除,它就不能再将它们从门静脉循环中截留,肝脏会收到比细菌过滤器仍在运行时更多的细菌。另一方面,可能会增加窦内皮细胞的吞噬活性,这可能会在这些变化的条件下吸收更多的细菌。最近,一些研究人员声称,脾切除术后肝脏内皮细胞的活性增加,他们的实验主要针对确定红细胞的命运。Pearce(1918)在报告狗的实验性脾切除术后的影响时指出,淋巴结会出现明确的代偿性变化,表现为内皮吞噬细胞的增殖增加,肝窦状隙的星状细胞数量也经常出现类似的代偿性增加。在这两种情况下,细胞显然是在原位形成的,而不是输送到器官中。他说:“这些发现表明,淋巴结和可能的肝脏可能会发展出一种代偿功能,”并表明,在压力时期,“肝窦状隙的星状细胞至少部分通过吞噬作用来破坏红细胞。”顺便说一句,他对脾切除术的历史和主题进行了很好的讨论。Motohashi(1922)报道,在兔中,脾切除术后约 45 天后,肝内皮的吞噬能力大大增强,内皮细胞数量增加。Nishikawa 和 Takagi(1922)在白老鼠中观察到类似的现象,脾切除动物的库普弗细胞大量吞噬红细胞,而对照动物的这些细胞从未表现出类似的倾向。可能是不同的物质引起肝内皮的不同反应。辅助实验。对五只兔子进行了一项侧实验,其中两只脾切除,三只对照,静脉内均匀注射肺炎球菌。几天后,它们都死于败血症。这个实验大大加强了前面的结论。结果发现,脾切除动物的肺毛细血管中有许多多形核嗜中性粒细胞,肝脏中有许多局灶性坏死。对照组肺中的多形核细胞较少,肝脏中没有局灶性坏死,而脾脏则明显充血和发炎。否则,这个实验不够重要,不值得单独报告。目前必须假设回答为什么肺毛细血管的内皮没有像碳实验中观察到的那样受到类似的刺激,而是表现出比对照组更低的活性的问题。对于碳来说,大量的外来物质被反复注射;这里只注射了一小量悬浮的结核杆菌。因此,这两种情况下对肺内皮的刺激会有很大的不同。在一种情况下,每次注射刺激性异物后,都会有连续的刺激波。在另一种情况下,会产生完全不同的刺激;根据以往的经验,细菌会在一两个小时内从循环中撤出,然后在含有它们的病变破裂时,以点滴的形式释放到循环中。至少可以说,两组动物肺部内皮反应的差异有很好的理论依据。