Laboratory of Pharmacology of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
J Exp Med. 1925 Oct 31;42(5):641-59. doi: 10.1084/jem.42.5.641.
The results of thirteen control experiments, designed to show the number of glomeruli in the rabbit's kidney open to the circulation under the chosen experimental conditions without intentional interference, indicate the "normal" range to be from 42 to 100 per cent. Since ten of the thirteen results fall within the figures 56 and 89 per cent, we may take these figures as the chief basis for our discussion. Three experiments only were made in which renal vasodilatation was produced by caffeine and salt. The percentage of open glomeruli found was in every case higher than any control except one. The results show without ambiguity that in rabbits, as in frogs, renal vasodilatation by caffeine is accompanied by increase in number of patent glomeruli. Our prime interest lay in the general question rather than in the action of individual substances in the group of vasodilators; hence this series was not extended further. Among the experiments designed to test the effects of renal vasoconstriction are to be found nine in which adrenalin was injected, two in which CO(2) was inhaled, two in which the splanchnic nerve was stimulated, and four in which hemorrhage was induced. Not all are of equal value for our present purpose, inasmuch as the degree of certainty with which we can assume that renal vasoconstriction was actually produced is not the same in all. Enough experience with the action of adrenalin on the kidney of the anesthetized rabbit is available to permit the assertion that the dosages used in the nine adrenalin experiments were sufficient to insure constriction of renal vessels. Similar certainty exists in the experiment in which high concentration of CO(2) was used; less in the case of 10 per cent CO(2). Stimulation of the splanchnic nerve in rabbits so frequently fails to produce results typical of direct constriction of renal vessels that we may regard the production of this effect in the two experiments in which this was done as doubtful. In the perfusion experiments by Richards and Plant (7) the reactions of the renal vessels to stimulation of the splanchnic nerve resembled those to intravenously injected adrenalin rather than to the direct excitation of constrictor fibers. In six rabbits in which Livingston subjected the nerve to varying degrees of electrical stimulation, in one only was distinct constriction of the renal vessels produced, and in this a latent period of 45 seconds occurred between the beginning of stimulation and the production of effect. In one of our experiments a rabbit was used in which the superior cervical sympathetic ganglion on the left side had been extirpated months before. During the stimulation of the splanchnic nerve the left pupil was observed to dilate, showing increased adrenalin secretion. Hence, we are inclined to regard the two attempts to produce vasoconstriction by this means as having been largely unsuccessful. In one experiment only of the four in which hemorrhage was induced was there unmistakable evidence of compensatory vasoconstriction which may have involved the renal vessels. The blood pressure curve of this animal showed rhythmically occurring waves of the Traube-Hering type and dyspnea was noted. In this the estimate of open glomeruli was 28 per cent. In the other three experiments no such change occurred and no dyspnea was seen. In pithed frogs, hemorrhage alone of moderate extent is less apt to lessen the number of patent glomeruli than are any of the other constrictor agencies tried by Richards and Schmidt. In this discussion, therefore, we lay little weight on the results obtained in the two experiments in which the splanchnic nerve was stimulated and on those of the first three hemorrhage experiments. The chief conclusion to be drawn from these experiments is that which was anticipated from the observations of Richards and Schmidt on frogs, and of Khanolkar on rabbits; viz., that in the rabbit, renal vasodilatation and renal vasoconstriction are usually associated with increase and decrease respectively in number of glomeruli through which blood flows (see Text-fig. 1). Analogous changes apparently occur in the capillary pathway in individual glomeruli. Hence renal function in mammals may be altered by changes in the extent of glomerular filtration surface to which the blood has access. Other conditions remaining the same, it is obvious that changes in extent of filtration surface must result in proportionate changes in urinary output. The figures for rate of urine elimination at the time of injection of the dye in these experiments are in substantial agreement with these statements (see Text-fig. 2). Exceptions to our chief conclusion as stated have been encountered. In Experiment 57,86 per cent of the glomeruli were open in a constricted kidney which was excreting no urine: in Experiment 30, 16 per cent were open in the kidney which was eliminating seven drops per minute: the outputs of the kidneys in the caffeine experiments were far higher than those of control kidneys in which comparable numbers of glomeruli were open. In considering these exceptions, account must be taken of the fact that other conditions do not commonly remain constant. When a renal vasodilator is introduced we conceive not only of possible increase in extent of accessible glomerular surface, but also of increase in glomerular pressure and increased rate of renewal of fluid in contact with glomerular membranes. Hence the response is greater than can be accounted for by any one factor alone. A basis of experiment exists in support of the belief that usually sufficient differences in physiological state exist among the small arteries and arterioles of the kidney so that a constrictor influence, exerted equally upon all, elicits various degrees of response (1). Closure of some, continuing patency of others, results. Blood flow and blood pressure in the glomeruli which are supplied by the vessels which remain open may be decreased, increased, or unchanged according See PDF for Structure. to the relation between the degree of reaction in those vessels and the height of arterial blood pressure. It is not to be expected that urinary outputs will uniformly vary with the number of glomeruli remaining open. Rapid blood flow and high glomerular pressure in relatively few glomeruli may result in more urine than slow flow and low pressure in many. This argument is implicit in Hermann's original statement and is completely in harmony with the result of direct observation in the frog. It is supported by the data of Experiment 30. In Experiment 57, however, urine was suppressed by adrenalin when 86 per cent of the glomeruli remained open. The kidney in this experiment was highly diuretic before the adrenalin injection. We may, therefore, assume that all or nearly all of the glomeruli were open and that intermittent contractions of the arterioles were minimal; hence, that the physiological state of the vessels concerned was more nearly uniform than is conceived to be the case when only a fraction of the glomeruli are open and in which intermittent contractions and relaxations must be pronounced. Thus a relatively uniform constriction was produced in all of such degree as to lessen materially glomerular pressure and blood flow, but insufficient to actually close more than a few afferent arterioles. In Experiment 33, the dosage of adrenalin was such as to permit the possibility that constrictor action may have been largely confined to efferent vessels (8). While the exceptional results have been discussed at greater length than has been devoted to the majority of experiments, we believe that they do not constitute adequate ground for criticism of the chief conclusion as stated.
结果的十三个对照实验,旨在显示肾小球的数量在兔子的肾脏开放循环选择的实验条件下没有故意干扰,表明“正常”范围为 42 到 100%。由于十三个结果中的九个都落在 56% 和 89%之间,我们可以将这些数字作为我们讨论的主要依据。只有三个实验是通过咖啡因和盐来产生肾血管舒张的。发现的开放肾小球百分比都高于除一个以外的所有对照。结果毫不含糊地表明,在兔子中,就像在青蛙中一样,咖啡因引起的肾血管舒张伴随着开放肾小球数量的增加。我们主要关注的是一般问题,而不是血管扩张剂组中单个物质的作用;因此,这个系列没有进一步扩展。在设计用于测试肾血管收缩作用的实验中,有九个注射了肾上腺素,两个吸入了二氧化碳,两个刺激了内脏神经,四个诱导了出血。由于我们不能确定在所有情况下肾血管收缩实际上已经发生的程度相同,因此并非所有实验都对我们目前的目的具有同等价值。在麻醉兔子的肾脏上使用肾上腺素的经验足以让我们断言,在九个肾上腺素实验中使用的剂量足以确保肾血管收缩。在使用高浓度二氧化碳的实验中也存在类似的确定性;在 10%的二氧化碳中则较少。刺激兔子的内脏神经经常不能产生直接收缩肾血管的典型结果,因此我们可以认为在这两个实验中产生了这种效果是可疑的。在 Richards 和 Plant 的灌注实验中(7),肾血管对内脏神经刺激的反应类似于静脉注射肾上腺素的反应,而不是直接兴奋收缩纤维的反应。在六只兔子中,Livingston 对神经进行了不同程度的电刺激,只有一只产生了明显的肾血管收缩,而且在这只兔子中,刺激开始和产生效果之间有 45 秒的潜伏期。在我们的一个实验中,一只左侧颈上交感神经节在几个月前被切除的兔子被使用。在刺激内脏神经时,观察到左侧瞳孔扩张,表明肾上腺素分泌增加。因此,我们倾向于认为通过这种方式尝试产生血管收缩的两次尝试在很大程度上是不成功的。在诱导出血的四个实验中,只有一个实验有明确的补偿性血管收缩的证据,这可能涉及肾血管。该动物的血压曲线显示出 Traube-Hering 型的周期性波动,并注意到呼吸困难。在这个实验中,开放肾小球的估计值为 28%。在其他三个实验中,没有发生这种变化,也没有观察到呼吸困难。在去大脑的青蛙中,只有适度的出血比 Richards 和 Schmidt 尝试的任何其他收缩剂都不太可能减少开放肾小球的数量。因此,在本讨论中,我们对刺激内脏神经的两个实验和前三个出血实验的结果没有给予太多重视。从这些实验中得出的主要结论是,这是从 Richards 和 Schmidt 在青蛙上的观察以及 Khanolkar 在兔子上的观察中预期的;即,在兔子中,肾血管舒张和肾血管收缩通常与通过血流的肾小球数量的增加和减少分别相关(见图 1)。在单个肾小球中,类似的变化显然也发生在毛细血管途径中。因此,哺乳动物的肾功能可能会因肾小球滤过表面的大小变化而改变,而肾小球滤过表面的大小变化会导致尿液排泄量成比例变化。这些实验中在注射染料时的尿液消除率数据与这些陈述基本一致(见图 2)。除了我们的主要结论之外,我们还遇到了一些例外情况。在收缩的肾脏中,有 86%的肾小球在没有尿液排泄的情况下是开放的;在实验 30 中,有 16%的肾小球在每分钟排出 7 滴尿液时是开放的;咖啡因实验中的肾脏输出远远高于开放肾小球数量相同的对照肾脏的输出。在考虑这些例外情况时,必须考虑到其他条件通常不会保持不变的事实。当引入肾血管扩张剂时,我们不仅可以设想可接近的肾小球表面的可能增加,还可以设想肾小球压力的增加和与肾小球膜接触的液体更新速度的增加。因此,反应大于任何一个因素单独作用的程度。在支持这样一种信念的实验基础上,即通常肾脏的小动脉和小动脉之间存在足够的差异,以至于同样的收缩因子会引起不同程度的反应(1)。结果是一些血管关闭,而其他血管保持开放。供应那些保持开放的血管的肾小球中的血流和血压可能会减少、增加或不变,具体取决于这些血管中的反应程度与动脉血压的高度之间的关系。预计尿液输出不会始终与开放的肾小球数量一致。相对较少的肾小球中快速血流和高肾小球压力可能导致更多的尿液,而许多肾小球中缓慢血流和低压力则不会。这一论点隐含在 Hermann 的原始陈述中,并且与在青蛙中直接观察到的结果完全一致。它得到了实验 30 数据的支持。然而,在实验 57 中,肾上腺素抑制了尿液的分泌,此时 86%的肾小球仍然开放。在肾上腺素注射之前,这个实验中的肾脏是高度利尿的。因此,我们可以假设所有或几乎所有的肾小球都开放,并且小动脉的间歇性收缩是最小的;因此,与开放的肾小球数量较少且必须明显间歇性收缩和松弛的情况相比,相关血管的生理状态更为一致。因此,产生了相对均匀的收缩,其程度足以显著降低肾小球压力和血流,但不足以实际关闭除少数入球小动脉以外的其他入球小动脉。在实验 33 中,肾上腺素的剂量允许存在这样一种可能性,即收缩作用可能主要局限于出球血管(8)。虽然异常结果比大多数实验讨论的更为详细,但我们认为它们不足以构成对所提出的主要结论的充分批评。