Biological Laboratories, Harvard University, Cambridge.
J Gen Physiol. 1943 Nov 20;27(2):119-38. doi: 10.1085/jgp.27.2.119.
Flicker response contours (F vs. log I(m)) for a square image subtending 0.602 degrees on a side, located in the fovea, are simplex probability integrals for a "white" and for four (five) spectral regions filtered from this white, and with different light-time fractions in the flash cycle. The subjective phenomena (the appearance of the field, the intensity threshold for color, and others) at the fusion points along these contours parallel in a variety of ways those obtained on duplex flicker contours resulting from the use of larger or eccentrically placed flickered images. These phenomena therefore cannot be held to indicate involvements of "rod" excitation. The scatter of the index of variation of I(1) is such as to demonstrate the full participation of all the potentially excitable neural units at all levels of flash frequency, for each kind of light. The magnitude of this scatter, a measure of neural integration in visual performance, is a function of the number of these units (with F(max.) nearly constant); the two quantities vary together when wave-length composition of light is altered. The properties of the contours for a white light and for the spectral regions filtered from it show that, for the image within the fovea, different numbers of units are excitable in flicker recognition according to the wave-length band used, and different mean frequencies of elements of effect under fixed conditions. The changes in the mean intensity for activation of these units as a function of the light-time fraction in the flash cycle are correlated with the numbers of these units; when this is corrected for, it is pointed out that despite the differences in shape of F vs. log I it cannot be concluded that the mechanism of excitation differs for different wave-lengths. It is indicated that "white" must be regarded as a synthesis, not a mere summation, of effects due to different spectral regions. Certain differences are pointed to as between foveal and more peripheral regions tested, and as between observers differing in the degree of the "yellow spot effect," with regard to the relative effects of wave-length and of image area. A general consequence is the outlining of conditions required for the precise comparison of excitabilities as a function of wave-length in the multivariate visual system.
闪烁反应轮廓(F 与 log I(m))用于边长为 0.602 度的方形图像,位于中央凹,是一个“白色”和从这个白色过滤的四个(五个)光谱区域的单纯形概率积分,并且在闪光周期中有不同的光时分数。在这些轮廓上的融合点的主观现象(场的出现、颜色的强度阈值等)以多种方式与使用更大或偏心放置的闪烁图像产生的双闪烁轮廓上获得的现象平行。因此,这些现象不能被认为涉及“杆”的兴奋。I(1)的变异指数的分散程度表明,在每个光的情况下,所有潜在可兴奋的神经单元都以全部分数参与到闪光频率的各个水平。这种分散的程度,是视觉表现中神经整合的一个衡量标准,是每个类型的光下所有这些单元数量的函数(F(max.)几乎是恒定的);当光的波长组成改变时,这两个数量一起变化。白光和从白光过滤的光谱区域的轮廓特性表明,对于中央凹内的图像,在闪烁识别中,根据使用的波长带,不同数量的单元是可兴奋的,在固定条件下,效应元素的不同平均频率。作为闪光周期中光时分数的函数,这些单元的激活的平均强度的变化与这些单元的数量相关;当对此进行校正时,指出尽管 F 与 log I 的形状不同,但不能得出不同波长的激发机制不同的结论。表明“白色”必须被视为不同光谱区域的效果的综合,而不仅仅是简单的总和。指出了中央凹和测试的更外围区域之间的某些差异,以及在“黄斑效应”程度不同的观察者之间的差异,关于波长和图像区域的相对效应。一个一般的结果是概述了在多变量视觉系统中精确比较波长依赖性兴奋性所需的条件。