Department of Chemistry, Lafayette College, Easton.
J Gen Physiol. 1945 Jul 20;28(6):605-26. doi: 10.1085/jgp.28.6.605.
A study has been made of those proteins which might offer exceptions to the law that the fluidity of a protein solution is a linear function of the volume concentration; viz., egg albumin, serum albumin, pseudoglobulin, euglobulin, gelatin, and sodium caseinogenate. Solutions of egg albumin below 20 per cent by weight obey the above law but somewhat below 30 per cent the fluidities begin to be too high, presumably due to the contribution to the fluidity made by the deformation of the particles as they come into contact, as the fluidity approaches zero. The fluidity of serum albumin solutions shows a similar behavior, being exceptional above 15 per cent in weight. Pseudoglobulin and euglobulin give fluidity-concentration curves (Fig. 4) which are linear up to about 2.5 per cent each in a total range of 20 and 14 per cent respectively. From this singular point both compounds show a second range which is linear. Pseudoglobulin is the only substance whose solutions seem to show a third linear range. We have also used the data of Chick and Martin for sodium caseinogenate and found evidence for two linear régimes. It is desirable at this time to call attention to the measurements of the flow of glycogen solutions by Botazzi and d'Errico (14) which in Fluidity and See PDF for Structure plasticity, page 207, are expressed in rhes. The data show two linear fluidity curves of different slopes. In this case it was definitely known that the data for each curve were measured with different viscometers which suggested the possibility of an error in viscometry entering in to confuse the issue. We have no suspicions as to the reliability of the data studied in this paper; we only wish to caution the readers that our hypotheses based on these data must be regarded with due reserve until confirmed. We have found a formula (11) based on the supposed linear relation between logarithmic fluidities and concentration which is convenient to use within the range, but close examination reveals that it does not reproduce the data for the higher concentrations at 25 degrees nor does it permit extrapolation to pure water It is not realistic enough because it does not contemplate any change of régime in going from viscous to non-Newtonian or plastic flow. The formula does not apply to any other of the proteins studied in this paper nor to the great majority of proteins already reported as following the linear law. These are serious objections. We have therefore offered as an alternative a simple formula (24) according to which the fluidities are additive in the viscous régime. When the emulsoid particles approach close packing, they are deformed and this deformation contributes to the flow and the fluidity volume concentration curve is again linear. In fact, there may be one or more additional changes of régime.
已经研究了那些可能违反蛋白质溶液的流动性是体积浓度的线性函数这一规律的蛋白质;即卵清蛋白、血清白蛋白、假球蛋白、优球蛋白、明胶和酪蛋白酸钠。重量百分比低于 20%的卵清蛋白溶液符合上述规律,但在重量百分比略低于 30%时,流动性开始过高,可能是由于颗粒在接触时变形对流动性的贡献,当流动性接近零时。血清白蛋白溶液的流动性也表现出类似的行为,在重量超过 15%时是异常的。假球蛋白和优球蛋白给出的流动性-浓度曲线(图 4)在各自的总范围为 20%和 14%时分别线性至约 2.5%。从这个奇异点开始,这两种化合物都显示出第二个线性范围。假球蛋白是唯一其溶液似乎显示出第三个线性范围的物质。我们还使用 Chick 和 Martin 关于酪蛋白酸钠的数据,并发现了两个线性区的证据。此时,有必要提请注意 Botazzi 和 d'Errico(14)对糖原溶液流动的测量,这些数据在《流动性和结构可塑性》第 207 页中以 rhe 表示。数据显示两条斜率不同的线性流动性曲线。在这种情况下,可以确定的是,每条曲线的数据都是用不同的粘度计测量的,这表明粘度计可能存在误差,这会使问题变得复杂。我们对本文研究的数据的可靠性没有怀疑;我们只是希望提醒读者,基于这些数据的假设必须在得到证实之前持保留态度。我们已经找到了一个公式(11),该公式基于对数流动性和浓度之间假定的线性关系,在该范围内使用很方便,但仔细检查表明,它不能再现 25 度时较高浓度的数据,也不能进行外推至纯水。它不够现实,因为它没有考虑到从粘性到非牛顿或塑性流动的任何变化。该公式不适用于本文研究的其他蛋白质,也不适用于大多数已报告的遵循线性规律的蛋白质。这些都是严重的反对意见。因此,我们提出了一个替代方案,即一个简单的公式(24),根据该公式,在粘性区,流动性是可加的。当乳化颗粒接近紧密堆积时,它们会变形,这种变形会对流动做出贡献,并且流动性-体积浓度曲线再次呈线性。事实上,可能会有一个或多个附加的变化区。